Not sure if anyone cares, but every bit of data helps.
I finally (after months of frustration) replaced my (what was brand new) Liteon DVD drive with a Sony unit. Works like a dream now. Just watched the extended Fellowship of the Ring, not a blip. Very happy.
It was pretty difficult to determine where the problem was since I "upgraded" to WinXP, changed the DVD drive and changed video cards all at the same time. Nero DVDSpeed helped prove the DVD drive was crap, as shown here:
http://www.hanneng.com/nero.JPG
For the record, the Sony drive doesn't attempt to climb the speed curve as fast, just a nice smooth steady increase until it peaks at about 7x. As you can see above, the Liteon unit seems almost out of control trying to spin as fast as possible, then crapping out, then speeding up again. Probably built to look good on data transfer tests, etc.
The sad thing is, teh Liteon drive was more expensive. My heart originally told me to go with a bigger name, but the seek time were transfer rate shown for the Liteon drive were better, and had the same speed and buffer size. Oh well, live and learn.
Thanks to those that tried to help.
I finally (after months of frustration) replaced my (what was brand new) Liteon DVD drive with a Sony unit. Works like a dream now. Just watched the extended Fellowship of the Ring, not a blip. Very happy.
It was pretty difficult to determine where the problem was since I "upgraded" to WinXP, changed the DVD drive and changed video cards all at the same time. Nero DVDSpeed helped prove the DVD drive was crap, as shown here:
http://www.hanneng.com/nero.JPG
For the record, the Sony drive doesn't attempt to climb the speed curve as fast, just a nice smooth steady increase until it peaks at about 7x. As you can see above, the Liteon unit seems almost out of control trying to spin as fast as possible, then crapping out, then speeding up again. Probably built to look good on data transfer tests, etc.
The sad thing is, teh Liteon drive was more expensive. My heart originally told me to go with a bigger name, but the seek time were transfer rate shown for the Liteon drive were better, and had the same speed and buffer size. Oh well, live and learn.
Thanks to those that tried to help.