AVS Forum banner

Status
Not open for further replies.
1 - 11 of 11 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,375 Posts
I started supporting EFF last year. *SOMEONE* has to look out for the common man.


Wait... isn't that what Congress is for? :)


Robert
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,448 Posts
Contribute early, contribute often. They do good work, the battles are many and the enemy fierce.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
556 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by Reden
I started supporting EFF last year. *SOMEONE* has to look out for the common man.


Wait... isn't that what Congress is for? :)


Robert
No, not anymore, it's now for corporations, organizations, lobbyist and special interest groups with lots of cash reserves, the one with the most money gets their way ...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,686 Posts
Yes, we have a representative government.


It does an excellent job of representing those with the biggest campaign contributions.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
281 Posts
Go get 'em guys! We're behind you on this one!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
183 Posts
A lawsuit by lawyers who don't understand or use the technology, know what is advertised or understand the import of the "Betamax" decision will not do any of us any good.


See, for example, this little tidbit from the complaint


"Plaintiff Newmark uses his ReplayTV 4000 unit for viewing television programs at times other than when originally broadcast ("time-shifting") and wants to use the advertised features that would allow him to view recorded programs on his laptop computer while traveling and to utilize "commercial advance" to avoid watching commercials. "


Where was it ever a "feature set" of Replay 400 to "view recorded programs on a laptop while traveling"? When did "time-shifting" (legal) mean that you could copy a copy (to put on your computer? Please, this is embarrassing. Add to that the idea that these people are now admitttig (see "He also uses them to send shows between his two units and between his units and his laptop computer for viewing outside his home. ") to violating the Replay terms of service.


There is also a claim for relief that asks the court to order "e. Each Plaintiff, as an owner of a ReplayTV 4000 unit, can lawfully use the Ethernet features provided with the device for the purpose of facilitating the viewing by one or more specific individuals of any television program broadcast free so long as said Plaintiff does not receive any compensation or direct commercial benefit thereby."
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
179 Posts
Actually they are very tech saavy... no where was space-shifting to a laptop ever described as a feature of the Replay 4000 series, but they want to establish that format-shifting is legal too. I agree that one is a little bit of a stretch, but there is nothing illegal about it, and they want to get it set as a legal precedant... otherwise you could get sued for using SwapDV.


Your last paragraph (Ethernet features) is just a legalese way of referring to sharing a show over the Internet.
 
1 - 11 of 11 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top