AVS Forum banner
  • Our native mobile app has a new name: Fora Communities. Learn more.

Epson 5050 vs LG hu810pw

11264 Views 64 Replies 12 Participants Last post by  Luminated67
Hello everyone. I’m planning my first theater build. I have it down to the Epson and lg. My room will have slight ambient light but I will be buying blackout shades for those small windows. At night, light won’t be an issue. Video source will primarily be through a shield pro, and I will be setting up a full sound system with receiver etc. it seems like the Epson will have much deeper darks and blacks while the lg may have sharper images and longer lamp life. My seating will be 14-15 feet from the screen. If I pair the lg with a matte grey screen, will it help get better contrast? Any thoughts of help will be greatly appreciated!
1 - 20 of 65 Posts
14 - 15' from what size screen? Unless it's a very large screen I doubt you will see much sharpness difference. Gary screen won't help with contrast as it is what it is but will lower the black floor. If you have a light colored room a gray screen can help there also with reflected light. I know I would pick the Epson but the LG is also high on the list.
Thank you for the feedback. It’ll be at least 120” possibly 135”.
The biggest advantage that the HU810 has is the solid state lamp. The HC5050 lamp is rated for 5000hrs in eco mode. UHP lamps tend to dim rapidly for the first 500-1000 hrs to 80-75% output and then more slowly until they reach 50% output (rated life), this means a constant drift in illumination (and calibration) as the lamp ages and a subsequent need to increase lamp power over time.

The 2nd advantage the HU810 has is that it covers the DCI-P3 gamut almost completely with no WCG filter needed. The Epson can engage a WCG filter to cover the DCI-P3 colour gamut, but doing so causes a steep drop in lumen output.

Finally, the HU810 has Dynamic Tone Mapping (DTM) which should help reduce the need to adjust the HDR settings for each different film.

These two videos provide a good comparison between the AU/HU810 and the HC5050/6050UB under the same test conditions:


See less See more
Would an led light strip behind the screen help with “perceived” contrast and of dark levels?
Would an led light strip behind the screen help with “perceived” contrast and of dark levels?
Yes the concept is sound as the extra light causes the iris in your eyes to close down so black is darker but so are the highlights. Not really practical and gimmicky in my opinion but some do like it. Will still washout the image in a white room and work better in a dark painted room.
Ok, we are planning to paint the entire room a dark blue. However the ceiling will still probably remain white.
The biggest advantage that the HU810 has is the solid state lamp. The HC5050 lamp is rated for 5000hrs in eco mode. UHP lamps tend to dim rapidly for the first 500-1000 hrs to 80-75% output and then more slowly until they reach 50% output (rated life), this means a constant drift in illumination (and calibration) as the lamp ages and a subsequent need to increase lamp power over time.

The 2nd advantage the HU810 has is that it covers the DCI-P3 gamut almost completely with no WCG filter needed. The Epson can engage a WCG filter to cover the DCI-P3 colour gamut, but doing so causes a steep drop in lumen output.

Finally, the HU810 has Dynamic Tone Mapping (DTM) which should help reduce the need to adjust the HDR settings for each different film.

These two videos provide a good comparison between the AU/HU810 and the HC5050/6050UB under the same test conditions:


None of these lamp based projectors lose anywhere close to 25% in 500 hours. Also the 810 does not do full DCI color space. It does not do any wider color space than the NX5/RS1000.
Ok, we are planning to paint the entire room a dark blue. However the ceiling will still probably remain white.
Paint the ceiling black or dark gray. Highly recommend doing so, especially with a screen that large. Commit! Painted my walls and ceiling Behr Dark Secret. Was worried at first that it was too dark, very happy I went with it.

I have the LG with a 142" screen in a dedicated room. Overall I'm happy with it. Don't have a Epson to compare it to. The Epson will have better black levels. I would recommend reading the owner forum posts for both, lots of good details.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
None of these lamp based projectors lose anywhere close to 25% in 500 hours. Also the 810 does not do full DCI color space. It does not do any wider color space than the NX5/RS1000.
You have developed a bad habit of misquoting me. I stated: "UHP lamps tend to dim rapidly for the first 500-1000 hrs to 80-75%..."

The NX-5 spec sheet states: "Lamp life: approx. 4500 hours when the lamp is in Low mode". Even if we assume a perfectly linear drop in output that would mean an output of ~89% at 1000hrs using low lamp, but lamp output does not drop linearly:

"How Lamps Age and Fail
The light output of UHP lamps will decrease over time. The light output will be the greatest when the lamp is new and will typically lose on the order of 20% of the original light output over the initial several hundred hours of use. After that the rate of loss of the light output will typically slow down during the remaining nominal life of the lamp. Ideally a UHP lamp’s light loss will be gradual and well behaved in reaching one-half of the original light output after a few thousand hours of use. The lamp life for the UHP lamps used in consumer front projectors is typically rated by the projector manufacturer somewhere between 2,000 hours and 4,000 hours. This rating is for a 50% loss of the original light output. Most projectors will have a high lamp and a low lamp setting (labeled various names by the different projector manufacturers). Many manufacturers will rate the lamp as having a longer operating life when the projector is operated in the low lamp mode."

LG states 97% DCI-P3 coverage in their spec sheets, and I used this figure.

This is from the PC review:
"Gamut is rated at 97% DCI-P3; I measured three dimensional color volume as 143% Rec. 709, 96% DCI-P3, and 65% Rec.2020. Contrast is rated at 2,000,000:1 dynamic with the projector's Adaptive Contrast feature active."
See less See more
You have developed a bad habit of misquoting me. I stated: "UHP lamps tend to dim rapidly for the first 500-1000 hrs to 80-75%..."

The NX-5 spec sheet states: "Lamp life: approx. 4500 hours when the lamp is in Low mode". Even if we assume a perfectly linear drop in output that would mean an output of ~89% at 1000hrs using low lamp, but lamp output does not drop linearly:

"How Lamps Age and Fail
The light output of UHP lamps will decrease over time. The light output will be the greatest when the lamp is new and will typically lose on the order of 20% of the original light output over the initial several hundred hours of use. After that the rate of loss of the light output will typically slow down during the remaining nominal life of the lamp. Ideally a UHP lamp’s light loss will be gradual and well behaved in reaching one-half of the original light output after a few thousand hours of use. The lamp life for the UHP lamps used in consumer front projectors is typically rated by the projector manufacturer somewhere between 2,000 hours and 4,000 hours. This rating is for a 50% loss of the original light output. Most projectors will have a high lamp and a low lamp setting (labeled various names by the different projector manufacturers). Many manufacturers will rate the lamp as having a longer operating life when the projector is operated in the low lamp mode."

LG states 97% DCI-P3 coverage in their spec sheets, and I used this figure.
"You have developed a bad habit of misquoting me. I stated: "UHP lamps tend to dim rapidly for the first 500-1000 hrs to 80-75%..."

Where is the misquote? That sentence is saying, worst case in 500 hours the lamp could be down to 75%. 75% means 25% loss, which is what I said. So no misquote. You post this all the time, pushing laser projectors. Let laser projectors stand on their own merit, not use fear to promote them. I have a lot of experience with JVC, Sony and Epson lamp based projectors. At some point all of them have had lamp issues, but it has been several years since any of these companies have had lamp problems.

As an example, JVC's lamps have been really good ever since they introduced the RS46 in 2012. None of the JVC lamp based projectors since then have come close to dimming at that rate. Heck there is an old JVC lamp measurement thread, where people tracked lumen loss that proves the loss is much less. The lamp measurement thread was started, because earlier models, pre 2012, did have lamp issues.

"LG states 97% DCI-P3 coverage in their spec sheets, and I used this figure."

Manufacturers make claims all the time. Sound & Vision measured and got 87.3% of DCI color space.LG HU810PW 4K Laser DLP Projector Review Test Bench
See less See more
"You have developed a bad habit of misquoting me. I stated: "UHP lamps tend to dim rapidly for the first 500-1000 hrs to 80-75%..."

Where is the misquote? That sentence is saying, worst case in 500 hours the lamp could be down to 75%. 75% means 25% loss, which is what I said. So no misquote. You post this all the time, pushing laser projectors. Let laser projectors stand on their own merit, not use fear to promote them. I have a lot of experience with JVC, Sony and Epson lamp based projectors. At some point all of them have had lamp issues, but it has been several years since any of these companies have had lamp problems.

As an example, JVC's lamps have been really good ever since they introduced the RS46 in 2012. None of the JVC lamp based projectors since then have come close to dimming at that rate. Heck there is an old JVC lamp measurement thread, where people tracked lumen loss that proves the loss is much less. The lamp measurement thread was started, because earlier models, pre 2012, did have lamp issues.

"LG states 97% DCI-P3 coverage in their spec sheets, and I used this figure."

Manufacturers make claims all the time. Sound & Vision measured and got 87.3% of DCI color space.
The misquote is taking a nuanced statement that indicates a range of probabilities and then taking out the range of probabilities and thus changing the meaning.

Perhaps you can provide some hard numbers for JVC projector lamp dimming versus operation time? This is a user's statement regarding a Sony projector:

"This is my first projector (Sony VPL-VW260ES), and I recently replaced the lamp after 2,500 hours on the old one – pretty much universally on the 'high' setting. It was getting noticeably dim and there was a lot of yellowing in the whites in certain areas of the screen.

Before replacing it, I measured the light emitted using a Lux Metre. Here's the before/after replacement lux readings:

Old: 2,550 hours 131.2
New: 0 hours 193

I decided then to graph out the performance of the new lamp by taking the same measurement every 100 hours. But I was somewhat dismayed to find that after just 100 hours is had lost 15-20% of its 'new' brightness already, with lux reading of 158.6.

My question, then, to you folk with more experience in projectors, is: Is this normal? Or do you think there's something wrong/defective with this lamp?"




Do you have a vested interest in promoting any projector brand or technology? I don't, but solid state light sources have many advantages, and are rapidly gaining market share and I find it hard to recommend UHP lamp based projectors anymore, given their obvious disadvantages.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Since your ambient light isn’t fully controlled I’d go with the LG. The dynamic tone mapping for HDR sources would tip the scale for me over the Epson. It works so good with the NX JVCs I’ve seen and I’ve heard it’s very good on the LG too. It’s a big bullet point on the list of features I want in my next projector.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I too was comparing these, and went with the Epson. I think it's meeting my expectations based on all the various reviews and posts I've read. I never actually saw the LG in person, but its reviews and posts left me wanting. Not trying to sway anyone, but following are some things to consider between the two.

The better black level of the Epson was a major factor for my decision. Now seeing the 5050 in action, it's black is pretty good but could be even better. I think I'd have been disappointed with the 810 based on the comparisons I've read - all said the Epson was quite a bit better on black than the LG. So far I don't think the 5050 is so good on black that anything quite a bit less good would be able to be satisfactory for me.

There was a lot of variation in the LG lens shift which seems from the posts that more often than not it did not match what LG stated in their material. Nor what Projector Central had in their throw calculator. I came to the conclusion that I probably wouldn't be able to mount it where it would fit best in the room - needed more up shift relative to the projector feet (to place upright on a high rear wall shelf-mount already in place from the old projector). I haven't followed LG lately so I don't know if anything's changed in the newer units being shipped. But it's something to research further if you have placement requirements or limitations. The Epson, though, has so much lens shift it's almost hard to run out of it.

The LG doesn't display movie 24fps as 24 but converts to 60fps. I prefer 24 as 24 so that worked against the LG for me. Some don't mind the conversion and some prefer it. Don't know if that's something that LG can ever change in any way, nor what you'd prefer. The 5050 displays 24fps as 24. so another factor to consider.

Many were seeing laser sparkle on the screen from the LG, and light spill out the front. Epson not being laser can't sparkle, and no light spill either. However a laser never needing replacement is really nice. Bulb dimming and eventual replacement not so nice. Dynamic tone mapping is great to have - wish the 5050 had it. 4-way pixel shift certainly has an edge over 2-way, but the Epson still looks mighty good.

So, I think the Epson will do nicely for me, but I'm kind of wishing the LG hadn't had those issues so I could have gone with it instead. Maybe that's part of the difference between a mature model and a new one.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 1
On the topic of sparkle, is that something that a certain screen material, color or gain can help minimize?

thank you everyone for the valuable feedback so far!
On the topic of sparkle, is that something that a certain screen material, color or gain can help minimize?

thank you everyone for the valuable feedback so far!
Yes, on the owner thread there's detailed discussion around it. The first page has everything summarized. In general ALR screens tend to be worse. Official LG CineBeam HU810PW/AU810PB Projector Owners...

I have a silver ticket WVS screen, I do not see any speckles.
It’s funny how colour range difference seem to be important but having watched both SDR and HDR versions of the same movies it doesn’t bother me as the differences are more subtle if both are correctly calibrated and shouldn’t be a million miles away from each other in appearance unless the director has chosen to give their HDR version more pop. What you can see is better blacks and the darker the scene the more important this becomes, ideally we all would be buying a JVC N series but few have the resources so we look for the best in our price bracket and the simple truth is the Epson is that machine.

As with every comparison on the internet you will have opinions and preferences for both, take on board everything said but please go see each yourself and decide what looks best to you.

What I will say is having the Epson and using a grey screen you can definitely see the benefit it gives to the blacks, personally I don’t feel the whites were affected as much, well not to my eyes.
See less See more
The misquote is taking a nuanced statement that indicates a range of probabilities and then taking out the range of probabilities and thus changing the meaning.

Perhaps you can provide some hard numbers for JVC projector lamp dimming versus operation time? This is a user's statement regarding a Sony projector:

"This is my first projector (Sony VPL-VW260ES), and I recently replaced the lamp after 2,500 hours on the old one – pretty much universally on the 'high' setting. It was getting noticeably dim and there was a lot of yellowing in the whites in certain areas of the screen.

Before replacing it, I measured the light emitted using a Lux Metre. Here's the before/after replacement lux readings:

Old: 2,550 hours 131.2
New: 0 hours 193

I decided then to graph out the performance of the new lamp by taking the same measurement every 100 hours. But I was somewhat dismayed to find that after just 100 hours is had lost 15-20% of its 'new' brightness already, with lux reading of 158.6.

My question, then, to you folk with more experience in projectors, is: Is this normal? Or do you think there's something wrong/defective with this lamp?"




Do you have a vested interest in promoting any projector brand or technology? I don't, but solid state light sources have many advantages, and are rapidly gaining market share and I find it hard to recommend UHP lamp based projectors anymore, given their obvious disadvantages.
I listed worst case, of his range, which was 25% at 500 hours. First you said I misquoted, which was not true. Now you are saying I misconstrued the statement. It seems even you find that part of his statement ridiculous, since you are trying to argue that I misconstrued his statement.

What lamp did he buy? Was it a Sony OEM or did he buy an aftermarket lamp? Reason I ask, in 2,550 hours of high lamp usage, the difference between his OEM lamp and the replacement lamp was only 32%. That is a mile away from 20-25% in first 500 to 1,000 hours. Finding a person or two that had a bad experience and then trying to use that one example to categorize the whole projector lamp industry is not science. That is scare tactic.
None of these lamp based projectors lose anywhere close to 25% in 500 hours. Also the 810 does not do full DCI color space.
Yes, I read the S&V review and in the dark room mode, S&V said the LG810 was at 87.3%, but it would not hurt to look at more reviews too to gauge more samples.

It does not do any wider color space than the NX5/RS1000.
The OP already narrowed the choices to the Epson 5050 or the LG 810, so I don't know how bringing in the JVC NX5 into the discussion for comparison helps here.

Keeping with the potential choices ...the Epson 5050 can still reach into DCI-P3 color without the filter in place. With the filter in place, according to Projectorreviews.com, the 6050 version had a 40% loss of light but came in at 95% of P3, which exceeds the dark room mode S&V measurement re the LG 810. The Epson does have 2,600 lumens on tap in its brightest mode, dynamic, but the filter engages in cinema or digital cinema. So, if the highest percentage of DCI color is a primary concern, one ought to be prepared to have that light loss with the Epson.
See less See more
It’s funny how colour range difference seem to be important but having watched both SDR and HDR versions of the same movies it doesn’t bother me as the differences are more subtle if both are correctly calibrated and shouldn’t be a million miles away from each other in appearance unless the director has chosen to give their HDR version more pop. What you can see is better blacks and the darker the scene the more important this becomes, ideally we all would be buying a JVC N series but few have the resources so we look for the best in our price bracket and the simple truth is the Epson is that machine.

As with every comparison on the internet you will have opinions and preferences for both, take on board everything said but please go see each yourself and decide what looks best to you.

What I will say is having the Epson and using a grey screen you can definitely see the benefit it gives to the blacks, personally I don’t feel the whites were affected as much, well not to my eyes.
You definitely make some great points but I don't know that the statement about what we would all be ideally buying is true across the board. At least for me, I had a JVC NX7 and replaced it with another brand. Anyway, the OP already narrowed his choices.

I agree with you on the gray screen and the benefit to black levels. I saw the Epson 6050 on different gray screens and it looked pretty impressive, especially for its price. One thing I noticed is that if you tone map in a player set to SDR BT2020 and use natural mode, the black levels look better. It's almost like straight up HDR into the machine limits the DI closing down as much, but I'm not really sure if that's what's happening.
1 - 20 of 65 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top