AVS Forum banner

1 - 20 of 888 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,355 Posts
Maybe not right at launch, but I'm almost definitely in on one of these once a sale hits or refurbs become available. I've missed my 3000 ever since replacing it with a BenQ TK800 that I received as a review sample. My PJ mounts to a pitched ceiling, so I don't have the space for a monster like a refurb 4000 or 5040ub, so this should be about the best I can do with size limitations. If I get impatient, I'll probably just go with a 3200, but if refurbs hit and prices come down to where the 3100/3700 are now in the next year or so, I'd definitely spring for the 3800.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
492 Posts
As I said in another thread I have a 150" screen in a man cave that I use for 50% sports and 50% movies. I switched a couple years ago from a 5030 to the 3700 and the increase in lumens FAR outweighed the loss of contrast. I'm really interested to see how the 3800 looks in my space. I am curious how they implement the HDR slider compared to the 5050 as well as how similar the lenses are. I said before if there was an e shift version of the 3700 I would be thrilled and here we are.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
454 Posts
Both are 3000 Lumens?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,077 Posts
Epson HC 3600 and 3800 revealed

These look like exciting products and I’m glad to see Epson start to compete with the large number of 4K DLP units in this price range (plus, based on Epson’s history, these should be less than MSRP fairly quickly assuming the tariffs aren’t an issue). But we have got to talk about Epson’s marketing here...

The forum argued for months over whether or not DLP’s XPR pixel shift technology could really be considered ‘4K’ and the DLP solution actually addresses all 8.3 million pixels in a 4K source. The Epson solution results in 4.15 million addressable pixels. I don’t see how they can, in good faith, call this 4K. This is the same 4K ‘simulation’ that the 4010/5050 employ. It’s a good solution— sharper than HD while still preserving a low price point and, for gamers, low input lag. But the marketing is super misleading.

Edit: if I just bought a 4010 I’d be pissed. Lol! These get HDMI 2.0 and the 4010 is still rocking 1.4? Here’s hoping Epson introduces an updated/refreshed 4010 soon.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5 Posts
The 3200 is 2000 cad in Canada. I hope the 3800 will be between 2200/2300 cad.
No price yet on their site for the 3800.


Envoyé de mon Pixel 3 en utilisant Tapatalk
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
66 Posts
The 3200 is 2000 cad in Canada. I hope the 3800 will be between 2200/2300 cad.
No price yet on their site for the 3800.


Envoyé de mon Pixel 3 en utilisant Tapatalk
The tw7000/HC3600 is available for 1000Euros 23th of sept in stock at my place . But the leap to the tw7100/hc3800 is 700 euros at the moment.. :( might change though.

I'll wait for the tw7000/HC3600 review until I buy due to 40,000 contrast ratio and from the ytube above they where not impress about the black level of the tw7100/hc3800 that had 100,000 contrast ratio

So hold your horses until @https://www.passionhomecinema.fr/blog/ or other reviews get's a sample of these projectors.

At the moment my sight is at the tw7000/HC3600
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
454 Posts
HC3200, not 3600, right?
The 3800 it is posted on the Epson site, $1799(US).
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
9,798 Posts
Epson's 3000 series updates make a lot of sense considering their last 2000 series updates narrowed the overall performance difference between those two series. Now the gap is narrowed between the 3000 series and 4000/5000/6000 series. Epson really needs to find a cost-effective way to go native 4K on its top consumer model series.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
51 Posts
I’m hoping to get something like a 4K version of the Epson 3100 in the next couple years for under $1,000. This is a step in that direction, but here’s hoping they soon start displaying all the pixels of 4K, not half.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,077 Posts
I’m hoping to get something like a 4K version of the Epson 3100 in the next couple years for under $1,000. This is a step in that direction, but here’s hoping they soon start displaying all the pixels of 4K, not half.


You’re going to be waiting awhile. For the Epson’s to do 4K they would need to design a higher resolution chip. Obviously, a native 4K chip would be an option but the cost would likely be near or higher than the LCOS competition ($5000+). Alternatively they could do what DLP does with their .66 DMD and run a ‘half’ 4K resolution that, when combined with pixel shifting, would result in a full 8.3 million pixels on screen. That solution is not exactly a 1:1 with a 4K source due to the placement of the pixels so some image processing / interpolation is required. But many DLP’s utilizing that chip have received praise for their clarity and sharpness.

3LCD cannot field a product that performs a quad shift to compete with the budget 4K DLP (.47) solution. This is due to LCD’s poor pixel response time. The .47 DMD operates at 240Hz (4 pixels produced for each frame of a 60Hz image). LCD simply doesn’t have the capability to operate at that speed. While there are technically gaming LCD MONITORS that claim to operate at 240Hz with 1ms pixel response which, in theory, would show that LCD was capable of this the truth of the matter is very few of even the best LCD gaming monitors live up to these exaggerated specs. Hell, LG, just make an IPS monitor that advertises 1ms gtg by in reality falls closer to 5ms AND THAT’S ACTUALLY GOOD. The vast majority of LCD displays have north of a 10ms response time.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
9,798 Posts
DLP, 3LCD and LCoS technologies each have a different set of pros and cons. The projector companies that market these three different technologies all try to emphasize their strong points and minimize their weak points. Each projector shopper has to weigh the pros and cons of each technology and pick the one with the pros that best suit their personal preferences and needs and with the cons they can most easily tolerate. One area where 3LCD excels is in color brightness which is why Epson has focused part of their marketing strategy on bright room light cannons. On the other hand 3LCD has a hard time competing against single chip DLP's inherent image sharpness and motion handling.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,896 Posts
I doubt we will ever see a LCD native 4K consumer projector. Because of the nature of a transmissive panel the supporting electronics need to be between the pixels the underlying reason for the SDE of LCD tech. The panel would need to be close to 4x the physical size of current LCD panels to avoid increasing the SDE and would make the optics way too expensive along with the size of the projector. LCOS with its reflective tech can have the supporting electronics behind the pixels with the smallest pixel gap is the reason why we see native 4K but even the JVC's take a hit on contrast as the gap is still the same with more pixels. DLP is in the middle so again the size of the projector and supporting optics are the restricting factor in native 4K.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
9,798 Posts
As the biggest projector manufacturer in the world I expect that Epson won't settle for being limited to half as many pixels as its rivals in an increasingly 4K video world. I expect their R&D department is researching various options in search of a technological breakthrough to address current 3LCD pixel limitations.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
454 Posts
Or, maybe they will have to switch to DLP as well. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: DunMunro

·
Registered
Joined
·
9,798 Posts
Or, maybe they will have to switch to DLP as well. :)
Since Epson already has a huge investment in production facilities for its own LCD panels it would make some sense to go to LCoS to achieve native 4K on their higher end models if they can't come up with a way to achieve native 4K (or even pixel shifting 4K) with LCD panels alone.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,077 Posts
Since Epson already has a huge investment in production facilities for its own LCD panels it would make some sense to go to LCoS to achieve native 4K on their higher end models if they can't come up with a way to achieve native 4K (or even pixel shifting 4K) with LCD panels alone.


They actually sell an LCOS right now— the Pro Cinema LS10500 “reflective laser” projector. But it is a similar 1080p X2 solution that they use in the rest of their lineup.

I have no idea what the technical hurdles might be towards getting affordable 4K or 4K pixel shift 3LCDs to market might be. All I know is LCD and LCD based tech all have this similar limitation in pixel response time that makes a quad shift impossible. I gotta believe they’re looking into it.. A lot of people were expecting a native 4K announcement this past summer. Hell, a lot of people think they sell a native 4K model now because Epson’s marketing is super misleading on this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DunMunro

·
Registered
Joined
·
66 Posts
Can't find any user reviews on this pj yet.

But I found that you can get 35% discount of the eh-tw7000/7100 if you order from Epson Germany

epson.de/store with the IFA2019 code

So eh-tw7000 will be for 850Euros and eh-tw7100 for 1100 Euros
 
1 - 20 of 888 Posts
Top