well, i don't know if the cameras used are the same as those used for EP II but be prepared to be disappointed if the result looks the same as Vidocq, a French movie about a masked serial killer in the 1900th century Paris. VIDOCQ is the first digitally filmed movie (as in motion picture
)with real actors etc.
The only good aspect is that sometimes the images looked very detailed and sharp, perhaps because there is no film grain (but there is video grain!).
other than that,it was artificial colors ( though the movie used color filters it seemed), poor smooth travelings, average and artificial brightness and contrast ( of the film, not the projector, which was a cinema projector I'm pretty convinced, not a 3DLP), poor blacks, sometimes ugly video noise. Unaturalness could best describes it if one word had to be retained.
I could compare my impressions right after since I went to see FAST AND THE FURIOUS, less sharp sometimes but so much more natural and smooth, with beautiful colors and real life brightness and contrast.
So, verdict is: be prepared....
The only good aspect is that sometimes the images looked very detailed and sharp, perhaps because there is no film grain (but there is video grain!).
other than that,it was artificial colors ( though the movie used color filters it seemed), poor smooth travelings, average and artificial brightness and contrast ( of the film, not the projector, which was a cinema projector I'm pretty convinced, not a 3DLP), poor blacks, sometimes ugly video noise. Unaturalness could best describes it if one word had to be retained.
I could compare my impressions right after since I went to see FAST AND THE FURIOUS, less sharp sometimes but so much more natural and smooth, with beautiful colors and real life brightness and contrast.
So, verdict is: be prepared....