Originally Posted by thebigdaddye not knocking your choice of tv you have ,but this article makes sense. read on = BUYING TIPS: 1080P Resolution for what? 11/07/05 The CE industry seems determined to add more confusion to already confused minds of consumers. Here comes this 1080P resolution in the fall of 2005. It would not take long for a serious person to ask this question: where is the content? Currently 1080i or 540P signal content is still regarded as “premium†programming by cable and satellite service providers, and still at the early stage of adoption by mass households. TV content providers still battle hard with TV hardware makers over the analog signal transition issue, and the mandatory cut-off date has been pushed back several times. With the current pace, it would take 2-3 years before content providers can bring the 1080i/540P programming to the mainstream. More importantly, even based on the 1080i/540P standard, the industry still has significant improvement to make on many crucial aspects of a digital TV as we have discussed in the previous segments. We always say you can’t run before you can walk. Some manufacturers simply ignore the common sense. But they could be the only party who stands to gain the extra profit in something that simply does not exist. Some people may argue that they are simply buying into a future technology. Well, future is all right. The problem is when that future becomes a reality; this 1080P TV will be probably worth half of what you pay today. as far as i know the only content for 1080p is hd/blue ray dvd's coming soon and ps3. |
Originally Posted by Auditor55 I'm glad more people are begining to see through the B.S. |
Originally Posted by davidnjessicacrz I didn't buy my TV for todays video being displayed by the mainstream. If I had that in mind I would have stuck w/my "32 Sharp CRT. I bought it to be, as it says on sticker of my HL-S5687W, "Future Ready." I wanted the HD format & the ability that when Blueray comes out this year & when 1080P content comes being asit may that it could be 10 years from now before it's mainstream, I'll already be able to display. I keep my TV's for a long time so I wanted to ready for what comes. There will always be something better in the future but I'll think about that 10 years later when I'm ready for a new TV. |
Originally Posted by Auditor55 Boycott Blu-Ray and HD-DVD by not purchasing them. |
Originally Posted by ChrisWiggles Another thread where people ignorantly conflate content resolution with display choices. |
What's frustrating to me, however, is that there are several sources that will indeed generate a pure 1080p image when deinterlaced, and there are even some native 1080p sources, but mentioning these always degenerates into an argument about what month Blu-Ray will become available, the outcome of the pending format war, and a bunch of other nonsense. |
Agreed. In fact, your argument (that 1080p content availability has little to do with the merit of 1080p displays) is my favorite argument because it totally short-circuits all of the "there's no 1080p content" BS that we get from our resident trolls. |
What's frustrating to me, however, is that there are several sources that will indeed generate a pure 1080p image when deinterlaced, and there are even some native 1080p sources, but mentioning these always degenerates into an argument about what month Blu-Ray will become available, the outcome of the pending format war, and a bunch of other nonsense. |
I would be more than willing to discuss these points with reasonable people, but 1080p is the current hot-button troll topic. Which might explain why we get 3 new threads per week rehashing the same stuff. |
My heart is with the argument that content DOES exist. But your argument is still my favorite because it shuts the trolls up in a hurry. There simply is no sound counter-argument |
Originally Posted by lipcrkr This whole 1080p arguement is useless because it depends on the consumer's use of the display. Also, the price differencial on a 1080p RPTV as opposed to a 720 display is relatively minor compared to plasma, so it's not as if you are paying a premium for 1080p. People who plan to upgrade in a couple of years can buy a 720 set now and be happy. People who plan to keep their set for 8 to 10 years are looking for something more futureproof which is a 1080p set that can accept 1080p sources. Consumers who plan on buying blueray or turning their display into an HTPC are more apt to want and buy 1080p's now. Some people use their display to watch some HD and some 480 DVD's, 1080p is not needed, people like myself, who will be heavily into HTPC use as well as keeping the set for a few years prefer a 1080p set with 1080p inputs. Different strokes for different folks. |
Originally Posted by thebigdaddye i post an article about 1080p display/content and say i am not knocking it and i'm called a troll? wtf. i don't know what i'm talking about? i never said a bad thing about 1080p, i put an article up about 1080p and YOU are the ones who become all up in arms. i was just sharing the article thats all i could care less what tv you buy or have or what the display resolution is 1080p/1080i or 720p. the point i was making by putting the article up is 1080p just dosen't have the content as 720p/1080i or am i missing something because all the tv show and magazine article i have read say 1080i is the standard for know and will be for awhile. anyway wasn't trying to start anything was just passing on an article. guess i will only post things that others won't get there panties in a bind lol |
Originally Posted by thebigdaddye no problem. just seemed that the remarks were to me ,but yes i see your point. like i said the article was only informal thats all nothing else. |
Talking about revisionist history, that argument was thoroughly refuted. |
As in the last thread, before the Industry Plants, Corporateers and Marketeers intentionally got that thread closed, the Consumerist never proved the "pratically" the merit of a so-called 1080p display. |