AVS Forum banner

8201 - 8220 of 12565 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
14,391 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by ncbill /forum/post/18268505


So, should we rescan after noon Monday?


I'm in Winston near the university and using a Winegard SS-3000 indoors can get Sauratown Mountain and everybody at Level Cross, but not you.


Any tips?

You can rescan now. I suspect you will only get 35. 8's signal in Winston has been hit and miss. 35's signal is much stronger.


Have to admit that the butterflies are starting to build. It is kinda feeling like June 12th all over again.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
9 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by foxeng /forum/post/18260100


Yes, the 35 antenna is right below the channel 8 antenna. Make sure your receiver isn't mapping 35 as 8. 99% of all the calls I have had have been that very issue.

I'll know tonight when I go home and try to tune you guys in! I sure would miss Neil, Van and Julie!


My TV likely knows what it is doing and already is on 35; I already knew it was smarter than me when I disconnected cable and got 37 channels OTA. Another hundred bucks that my wife can spend instead of Time Warner! Now, just make sure that the FCC doesn't take channel 35 away from us!!!


Steve
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
14,391 Posts
The channel 8 transmitter was turned off at exactly 11:02:00 ET. RIP.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
62 Posts
I too am in Eden. The WGHP signal on 35 is coming in well . . . . much better than even the pre-transition 35. I guess it makes us glad that all those folks in the late 50's figured out how to switch Florence, SC to 13 so that a Ch. 8 could be squeezed into High Point. Had it not been for them, there would probably be no transition now, and the third leg of the "triad" would have never been though of as more than a suburb of Thomasville. Good work and congrats to all of your engineering crew.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
14,391 Posts
We have had very few calls over this change. Most have been either cable/sat viewers who the change didn't effect or people who didn't understand they needed to rescan their receivers. This has been a much different result than the June 12th transition. We hated to give up RF 8, but with little relief in sight, we feel we have made the right decision. There are still some things we can do to improve 35, but we are going to wait and see how this works out before spending any more money, especially in this economy.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
758 Posts
Hey foxeng, I just noticed this morning that on my HR20 D* box that I have two 8.1 digital channels. The new one is listed as WGHPSTA. It shows the same stuff as the original channel. Do you know what this is?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
14,391 Posts
It has been there for a while. The one that says WGHP-DT had been mapped to RF 8 while WGHPSTA had been mapped to RF 35. Looks like both are mapped to 35 now.


D* was a little behind on the channel change. We did a test last week turning off the channel 8 transmitter for an hour and found that D*'s SD was set to 35 and the HD was set to 8. Something happened on the HD side that the word didn't get to them so I suspect it will take a while for them to get it all straight. We have been operating with a STA on channel 35 since last June so that is where that is coming from. When the paperwork clears on all this, I would suspect that will go away and it will go back to just WGHP-DT on RF 35 for the tuner.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
9 Posts
Well, no luck on 35.


Matt, I am on the ridge south of the Dan off 14, wonder if my problem is height. I have a rooftop Winegard (my wife calls it an "ugly, bristly thing") that I am unsure of the model number as a "pro" installed it. What are you using?


I get 16, 20, 26, 27, 45 and 48, but no 35. Had to watch channel 2 news last night and "24" on channel 27. Too many numbers, my head hurts...


Steve
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,931 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by kitfoxdrvr /forum/post/18277368


Well, no luck on 35.


Matt, I am on the ridge south of the Dan off 14, wonder if my problem is height. I have a rooftop Winegard (my wife calls it an "ugly, bristly thing") that I am unsure of the model number as a "pro" installed it. What are you using?


I get 16, 20, 26, 27, 45 and 48, but no 35. Had to watch channel 2 news last night and "24" on channel 27. Too many numbers, my head hurts...


Steve

It sounds like a combo VHF/UHF. It might just need to be turned a bit, or you might want to get just a UHF antenna and have more receiving power.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
62 Posts

Quote:
I am on the ridge south of the Dan off 14, wonder if my problem is height. I have a rooftop Winegard (my wife calls it an "ugly, bristly thing") that I am unsure of the model number as a "pro" installed it. What are you using?

I'm using a Radio Shack 6x8 panel amplified antenna hung 8 feet off the ground on my front porch. I live on old 87 near the rec center, and get 2, 8, 12, 16, 20, 43 (61), 45, 47, and 48 with no problems. On clear, cold days, I can add 3, 4, 7, 10, 13, 21, 26, 27, 38, 40 (analog) and 50 (analog) with varying degrees of reception. I plan on erecting a 20ft. pole mount for the antenna at some point to see how much improvement I get.


For now, I'm well satisfied with what I'm getting digitally. I know where you live, generally. There seem to be a lot of pine trees up on that ridge. Do you have your antenna above the treeline? Sometimes getting it up another 5-10 feet can do you a world of good. I'm wondering too if you get us on 47.


Later . . . .

Matt
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
9 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Smith-WGSR /forum/post/18283456


I'm wondering too if you get us on 47.


Later . . . .

Matt

Matt:


Clear as a bell! If my mother in law had her way, that would be the only channel we need!!!


Steve
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
9 Posts
I am probably going to set my dad up with a new antenna and I am considering a UHF only Channel Master 4228. Are any of the Greensboro/High Point/Winston Salem/Roanoke/Lynchburg stations really still on VHF? Specifically, 2, 7, 10, 12 and 13 (I think the 4228 will be fine on 10, 12 and 13, but probably not 2 and 7). I need to stay on his good side and lot's of channels would help! Losing WFMY2 would be bad.


If this antenna works well, it may be my solution for 8/35.


Thanks all!


Steve


Thanks!

Steve
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
17,275 Posts
WSET-13 is on VHF.


- Trip
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
14,391 Posts
WSET-13 and WTVD-11 are the only VHFs in the region now. Everyone else is UHF now.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
17,275 Posts
foxeng:


Looks like your construction permit has now been issued.


- Trip
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
14,391 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trip in VA /forum/post/18290275


foxeng:


Looks like your construction permit has now been issued.


- Trip
"And there was much rejoicing (YAH!)" Monty Python and the Holy Grail


(I love that movie!)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
14,391 Posts
On a different note, AT&T's U-verse must be getting ready to launch. They touched base with us yesterday about running fiber to their headend.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
357 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by foxeng /forum/post/18291052


AT&T's U-verse must be getting ready to launch.

I agree that this is good to hear. Before I moved back to the Triad a couple of years ago, I lived for a few months with some friends outside of Dallas who had Verizon FiOS. It'd be great to have options here...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
758 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by SVTarHeel /forum/post/18291959


I agree that this is good to hear. Before I moved back to the Triad a couple of years ago, I lived for a few months with some friends outside of Dallas who had Verizon FiOS. It'd be great to have options here...

Don't confuse U-Verse with FiOS. FiOS runs it's fiber all the way to your house which brings the best PQ in the business and no video stream limitations. U-Verse on the other hand only runs fiber to the VRAD box in your neighborhood. Then from that box they only run copper to your house. Because of that there is limited bandwidth available which means a limited number of active video streams which IIRC, is only 4. It can be either 2 HD and 2 SD or 1 HD and 3 SD.


Which means if you have a HD DVR, then you can't have another HDTV and watch separate programming from the first HDTV. Also you're limited with the total number of TVs and DVRs you can have active. In my situation, 5 TVs (2 of those HDTV) and five DVRs (2 of those HD DVRs) U-verse wouldn't work. I realize that my needs are more than most would need, but even lesser needs couldn't be handled. If you want 2 DVRs, then you couldn't have a 3rd TV.


Having read reviews on PQ, the limited bandwidth available (IIRC 25 mbps) means that there are issues there too. SD PQ is suppose to be great and the HD PQ is good on smaller HDTVs. But if you have like 55 inch and above, the PQ is less than desired. Less than say Directv, and definitely less than the best which is FiOS. The PQ gets worse if you have Internet from U-Verse since it comes from the same source of bandwidth that the TV signals comes from.


But in U-Verse's defense, they have a great HD channel lineup. Better than TWC, Dish or Directv. IIRC, FiOS is equal or better. Now sometime in late April Directv will start adding channels again and the have enough capacity coming online soon that if used properly, should put them back on top in the HD channel race.
 
8201 - 8220 of 12565 Posts
Top