Gary, doing the vertical squeeze on the 12xx end would distort everything else, but it's still the right way to view the 1080i signal.
The Samsung TS160 is better in this regard, because you can choose a default 4x3 screen size, which automatically letterboxes 1080i HD content, while retaining a normal 4x3 full screen aspect for SD content.
So the work-a-round is there in the HD200 for you to watch letterboxed 1080i and normal 4x3 SD, but looks like switching between HD 16x9 and SD 4x3 channels will force you to either watch everything in 480p to make aspect ratio control automatic, or switch aspects manually in 1080i as you surf through channels.
That's a shame, really. I have an HD200 on order, and presently use the TS160. I don't think I'll have your problem only because my tv is a 16x9 widescreen, but I have to read the manual some more to verify. I won't be happy if WAF can't just switch channels and have it automatically view in the proper aspect, at the highest available resolution of the broadcast signal.
Tom
The Samsung TS160 is better in this regard, because you can choose a default 4x3 screen size, which automatically letterboxes 1080i HD content, while retaining a normal 4x3 full screen aspect for SD content.
So the work-a-round is there in the HD200 for you to watch letterboxed 1080i and normal 4x3 SD, but looks like switching between HD 16x9 and SD 4x3 channels will force you to either watch everything in 480p to make aspect ratio control automatic, or switch aspects manually in 1080i as you surf through channels.
That's a shame, really. I have an HD200 on order, and presently use the TS160. I don't think I'll have your problem only because my tv is a 16x9 widescreen, but I have to read the manual some more to verify. I won't be happy if WAF can't just switch channels and have it automatically view in the proper aspect, at the highest available resolution of the broadcast signal.
Tom