AVS Forum banner
  • Our native mobile app has a new name: Fora Communities. Learn more.

HDMI in?

891 Views 5 Replies 5 Participants Last post by  umdivx
I have been looking at Media center pcs and was wondering why none have hdmi or component ins? All seem to have tuners with hdmi outs or cable card inputs but what about the people who cant get cable cards and still have to use set top boxes but would prefer to connect to the pc with hdmi or component instead of coax or s-video. Any insight would be great!
1 - 6 of 6 Posts
You can get one for $350, but there's, in general, a minimal market since recording one hour of uncompressed HD 1080p is something near 500 Gigs. Plus, if the content owners press the matter, they will have the cable/satellite companies turning on HDCP, which makes the HDMI input much less useful because no company will assume the liability of making an HDCP-compliant receiver card for the PC.


There's something to be said for a mere passthrough (rather than recording), but in that case why not connect directly to a TV instead of going through the PC?* And with a passthrough you still have to deal with potential HDCP issues.


* A rhetorical question, of course. The answer is "Because I want the flexibility". But they don't see that as a valid market impetus.

Quote:
Originally Posted by archibael /forum/post/0


You can get one for $350,


Really?

Where ?
 here , apparently.

Quote:
Originally Posted by eatapeach /forum/post/0


I have been looking at Media center pcs and was wondering why none have hdmi or component ins? All seem to have tuners with hdmi outs or cable card inputs but what about the people who cant get cable cards and still have to use set top boxes but would prefer to connect to the pc with hdmi or component instead of coax or s-video. Any insight would be great!

There's nothing practical for recording over component or HDMI (HDCP makes HDMI almost worthless for recording).


As noted above, there are options for capturing component/HDMI, but what's become clear over the years as PCs as PVR/DVRs have evolved, is that there's a significant difference between using something for capture and using something for recording.


For capturing, you're usually only concerned about quality. Things like ease of use, compatibility, resource requirements are distant seconds to quality, and this shows is you look at them.


For recording, quality is important, but often, compatibility, ease of use and resource requirements are equally if not more important than quality.


One of the best examples I can think of is the PMS Video PDI Deluxe card which accepts SD Component, RGB and PDI, inputs but does no processing whatsoever, vs something like the nVidia DualTV. The former is clearly the quality leader, using the premier inputs and capturing with arbitrary compression. However it's limited application compatibility, lack of audio inputs (I think, meaning it requires a separate device for audio capture), and high capture requirements (CPU usage, disk space, and "sensitivity" to other processes) due to the way it works leads to it being almost completely ignored as a TV recording card.


Conversely, the nVidia DualTV, offering compatibility with the most popular PVR apps, integrated audio recording, integrated hardware compression and muxing of audio/video, and (due to hardware compression) minimal hardware requirements (small file size, 0 CPU usage, nearly impervious to other processes) make it and cards like it the most popular for TV recording.


The situation is very similar with HD now. There are a couple options out there for capturing raw, uncompressed HD, like the ones mentioned. But any recording with them is a lot of work and is very demanding in many ways. As far as raw HD capture goes, we're with HD about where we were 6-7 years ago with SD, that being stuck with software-encoder capture cards.


These cards work, but they are definitely sub-optimal for PVR/DVR duties and definitely not acceptable to even the HTPC group at large. If you look back on the history of PC capture, you'll see that using the PC as a TV capture device didn't really take off until the second generation of hardware-encoder based SD capture cards (the PVR 250).
See less See more

Quote:
Originally Posted by eatapeach /forum/post/0


I have been looking at Media center pcs and was wondering why none have hdmi or component ins? All seem to have tuners with hdmi outs or cable card inputs but what about the people who cant get cable cards and still have to use set top boxes but would prefer to connect to the pc with hdmi or component instead of coax or s-video. Any insight would be great!

Gotta love these threads, they always show up once a month or so. The fact is you'll never see a consumer based product for capturing component for the mere fact that RIAA/MPAA/Cable Labs/ect... want to protect that content path and you can't protect an analog source.


So we've still got HDMI, however that blackmagic device can only accept uncompressed, non-hdcp content. So you won't be able to hook up your cable box to a device like that and record in a DVR fashion.


Right now out side of cable cards, you've got two options, QAM based tuners like the HDhomerun, Fushion, and Myhd. Or you can get a modded cable box doing the R5000HD mode located here: http://www.nextcomwireless.com/r5000/products.htm


so those are your options, not what you wanted to hear, but thats life.


- Josh
See less See more
1 - 6 of 6 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top