specifically I'm interested in any recomendations on other 50 inch DLP TVs. I've narrowed it down to DLP due to price and performance.
Originally Posted by Zainag - The 5087 is only about 300-400 more expensive than a 5086W so in a sense is only about 15% more expensive |
Originally Posted by ntode So I just talked to my friend who bought the 60 inch 1080p Samsung last year. He basically told me I'd be an idiot if I didn't spend the extra money. So, now I'm looking at the 87 pretty seriously. I need to do additional research, but I'm thinking the 87 may be the way to go. Not sure what the difference is with the 88, but I don't want to spend any more money. Thanks for the responses. I think I'll stick with the Samsungs. |
Originally Posted by JohnR_IN_LA So I assume your friend's set doesnt have these new features, right? I am considering last years model 61 incher, used at $xxx. I am wondering if i should go for the new model with the 10 bit though? Maybe a smaller screen to keep the cost down.. decisions descisions.. Im also concerned that last year's model doesnt have HDMI, it has DVI instead |
Originally Posted by Zainag You should seriously consider the HLS5087W instead. Its future proof with its 1080p input and the cabinet is nicer looking (marginally) than the 5086. I received my 5087 last week and can vouch for the fact that 720p material looks better on a 1080p tv than on a 720p tv of the same size. 4 Other important considerations you should keep in mind are : - The 5087 has 10bit processing which smooths out color gratdations in in the image ... banding is highly reduced - The 5087 has a USB slot which allows you to view pictures and such on the TV via a USB device -The 5087 has a dynamic iris which greatly enhances contrast from the standard 3500:1 of the 5086. Blacks are definitely blacker - The 5087 is only about 300-400 more expensive than a 5086W so in a sense is only about 15% more expensive I was also very interested in a 5086W initially but after doing a lot of research esp on this forum, I changed my mind and was glad that I went with the 5087. My biggest fear was that games on my XBOX 360 would have lag due to conversion from the native 720p or 1080i to 1080p. The 87 series TV however have a newer processor to do the upconversion and using the "Game Mode" , I have not seen any lag whatsoever. Hope this helps |
Originally Posted by Nhan Interesting. Were you comparing the 5087 directly to the 5086 with the same material/connection etc. to confirm your finding? Wouldn't distance from the TV make a big difference in screens this "small"? The 5086 has a USB port for picture display/mp3 playback, as well. |
Originally Posted by gozorak Zainag..I am looking at one of the new Samsung and Like you XBOX/ video game performance is the number 1 issue for me with all of the reports of lag on various sets. You stated that so far you havent had any issue with lag on the 5087. That is encouraging. But what kinds of games have you used in your tests? Any racing games like PGR3 or first person shooters with lots of movent since these kinds of games seem to have the greatest problem with lag...thanks |
Originally Posted by JohnR_IN_LA I got last year's HL-R6168W (61 inch, 1080p, HDMI) for $2k used, with very few hours. I also bought a HD-DVD player at the same time, and all i can do is drop my jaw... Amazing! The HD-DVDs are spectacular, the contrast is extremely good, but what suprised me, is even the standard DVDs look excellent with the upconversion to 1080i. The Toshiba HD-DVD player does seem a little half-baked, interface-wise. But as someone else said, "All is forgiven when the movie starts". So how did I do price wise? |