I'm kind of baffled by the incredible rise in the picture of the HT1000. It's a 4:3 projector, which is supposed to be largely for home theater, but the rise in the picture rules out it's use on most any typical 4:3 screen installation in a home. Assuming an 8' ceiling and a halfway decent screen size (say, 80" wide) there's no way to position the projector (ceiling mounted) without the bottom of the screen sitting right on the floor. Go much bigger, and there's no way to even fit the screen in the room...WITHOUT using tilt and the digital keystone. It's almost as if NEC assumes every home theater will just use this 4:3 projector exclusively on a 16:9 screen. Seems a little odd.
Anyway, I know this has been discussed elsewhere but I was wondering how good a digitally keystoned picture looks on the HT1000. On other projectors I know that the use of digital keystone gives you those pixel step/pivot points which are horribly distracting and they usually generate other artifacts to boot. How good is the digital keystone of the HT1000?
I wish it had either optical keystone or lens shift...or just a reasonable rise in the picture, then I'd be all over getting one!
Thanks in advance for any responses
Anyway, I know this has been discussed elsewhere but I was wondering how good a digitally keystoned picture looks on the HT1000. On other projectors I know that the use of digital keystone gives you those pixel step/pivot points which are horribly distracting and they usually generate other artifacts to boot. How good is the digital keystone of the HT1000?
I wish it had either optical keystone or lens shift...or just a reasonable rise in the picture, then I'd be all over getting one!
Thanks in advance for any responses