section A
This is the framework that I will build my argument on:
1.) People living in three Dimensions move Electrons while interacting with their environment.
2.) People do this moving of electrons with their eyes open.
3.) People do this moving of electrons with their eyes closed while they rest in meditation.
This next statement is about three dimensions and how it relates to moving electrons.
4.) There is a relative point of view of three dimensions: how you see three dimensions, not what somebody else see's.
We navigate around our environment thinking about what is immediately around us that can affect us rather than what is safely far away.
If we have a obstacle course of following a painted spiral on the ground and the spiral is easy to follow.
We follow the line directly before us. we think about the part of the painted line we must navigate at that moment.
If somebody else was behind me and they were following the painted line too, they would have a different part of the painted line before them.
This means there is a relative point of view of the painted spiral on the ground: what you see, not what somebody else see's.
Just because I'm in front of them doesn't mean they use what I see of the painted spiral, they reason with their brain what is before them at that moment.
__________________________
Section B
And this leads me to my point.
When we close our eyes to meditate and rest, we think. What we think about is moving and interacting with out environment.
When the movies three dimensions are reasoned in this meditative state, how do we separate reality from a movie?
Movies in three dimensions: use the z axis which let's you see the picture so some parts of it are in the distance and some are up close to you.
This effect make it more immersive.
But the thing is it makes us reason what is closer to us and what is farther from us, just like reality does.
In reality since we think more about what is closer to us, we think about handling it.
Take a hamburger for instance, you think more about the one served to you for dinner rather than the one somebody else is eating, especially if your hungry.
So back to the movies using three dimensions, since the movie picture is closer to us when in 3D does our subconscious differentiate that what it see's is a movie and not reality?
If the subconscious thinks while we rest and mediate with out eyes closed, and there we think about our environment we live in, does the subconscious add what it saw in the 3D movie to what we think about?
If we are creatures of habit, then what habits are being formed as our subconscious adds what it see's in the 3D movies to our coping skills, our learning skills?
Perhaps a habit is being formed when the person rests after watching a 3D movie and the person considers what they saw with their eyes closed.
And that is why people talk about wanting to live in the planet Pandora from the movie Avatar, habits are hard to break, a learned skill is difficult to unlearn.
If this is the case then unstable people who are susceptible to influence will be negatively affected by watching 3D, especially if they do so watching the same movie several times in a few days or weeks.
Also if a child's brain is still unformed fully then how will it develop with the influence of 3D television and theater if their brains add what they see to their learning and coping skills?
Perhaps, after viewing all of the above, Humans weren't meant to have 3D movies and television. If the kids and weak people can't handle 3D, then why should the regular healthy people who can watch 3D entertainment do so?
__________________________
If you would like to say why you disagree with something in this first post, then please say which sections and which part of the logic you don't understand or disagree with.
![]()
__________________________
Edit, here is some more information. What you do with this information or if you disbelieve it or deny it is up to you. Like they say in the movie the matrix: take the red pill or the blue pill.
The path taken in the picture is a Dog sees 2 dimensional picture.
It interpretes that picture so it changes from 2 dimensions to 3 dimensions.
If the 3 dimensions is not interpreted to 3 dimensions, but looks 3 dimensional, and is still a 2 dimensional picture.
Then how does the brain add the information that this is a 2 dimensional picture it interpretes to 3 dimensions?
It doesn't add that information that the picture is 2 dimensions and it switched it to look like 3 dimensions.
The result is a image that appears to the brain as 3 dimensions, and the brain is wired to operate in 3 dimensions, so the picture becomes reality to the brain.
Then when the person finished watching the 3D movie and rests with the eyes closed, the brain figures out how to operate successfully in the world.
The thoughts treat the movie's environment as someplace that needs to be figured out how to survive and be successful there.
People can lose touch with reality if their brain can't distinguish reality from a movie, and there is the feeblness.
And children who grow up with this are no different and are not immune to how the brain interpretes this 2 d picture as though it were real life 3d.
__________________________
I will describe a test to verify the brain treats 3d differently than 2d when discussing movies.
If you can scan a persons brain while they view both 2D and 3D movies so you could see the regions of the brain that go active, here is what to test.
Show a video of some object moving from one side of the screen to the other or the middle of the screen erratically. Then show that object being thrust towards the viewer or test subject.
Depending on what is shown moving about on the screen the persons brain should show different levels of response: very alert, or amused, etc.
The brain should treat 2d shown on a screen at a distance much differently than a full blown 3d picture than fills the persons view like imax movie screen.
The argument is that the brain becomes used to 3d and eventually responds like 2d. So you would need many different things that move erratically: one test shown a clown, another test shown a lizard, another test shown a small child that needs to be helped to walk, another could show a puppy, etc.
If after many tests with each test showing a different object moving erratically the brain shows it thinks the video is 2d for both the 3d and 2d tests, then 3d is not a problem for healthy adults.
Then, if allowed you could test a child, then a mentally unstable person who takes their medication and is stable.
And if you do this test, publish the results in this thread too so the other people who think 3d is safe can see if they are right or not.
![]()
This is the framework that I will build my argument on:
1.) People living in three Dimensions move Electrons while interacting with their environment.
2.) People do this moving of electrons with their eyes open.
3.) People do this moving of electrons with their eyes closed while they rest in meditation.
This next statement is about three dimensions and how it relates to moving electrons.
4.) There is a relative point of view of three dimensions: how you see three dimensions, not what somebody else see's.
We navigate around our environment thinking about what is immediately around us that can affect us rather than what is safely far away.
If we have a obstacle course of following a painted spiral on the ground and the spiral is easy to follow.
We follow the line directly before us. we think about the part of the painted line we must navigate at that moment.
If somebody else was behind me and they were following the painted line too, they would have a different part of the painted line before them.
This means there is a relative point of view of the painted spiral on the ground: what you see, not what somebody else see's.
Just because I'm in front of them doesn't mean they use what I see of the painted spiral, they reason with their brain what is before them at that moment.
__________________________
Section B
And this leads me to my point.
When we close our eyes to meditate and rest, we think. What we think about is moving and interacting with out environment.
When the movies three dimensions are reasoned in this meditative state, how do we separate reality from a movie?
Movies in three dimensions: use the z axis which let's you see the picture so some parts of it are in the distance and some are up close to you.
This effect make it more immersive.
But the thing is it makes us reason what is closer to us and what is farther from us, just like reality does.
In reality since we think more about what is closer to us, we think about handling it.
Take a hamburger for instance, you think more about the one served to you for dinner rather than the one somebody else is eating, especially if your hungry.
So back to the movies using three dimensions, since the movie picture is closer to us when in 3D does our subconscious differentiate that what it see's is a movie and not reality?
If the subconscious thinks while we rest and mediate with out eyes closed, and there we think about our environment we live in, does the subconscious add what it saw in the 3D movie to what we think about?
If we are creatures of habit, then what habits are being formed as our subconscious adds what it see's in the 3D movies to our coping skills, our learning skills?
Perhaps a habit is being formed when the person rests after watching a 3D movie and the person considers what they saw with their eyes closed.
And that is why people talk about wanting to live in the planet Pandora from the movie Avatar, habits are hard to break, a learned skill is difficult to unlearn.
If this is the case then unstable people who are susceptible to influence will be negatively affected by watching 3D, especially if they do so watching the same movie several times in a few days or weeks.
Also if a child's brain is still unformed fully then how will it develop with the influence of 3D television and theater if their brains add what they see to their learning and coping skills?
Perhaps, after viewing all of the above, Humans weren't meant to have 3D movies and television. If the kids and weak people can't handle 3D, then why should the regular healthy people who can watch 3D entertainment do so?
__________________________
If you would like to say why you disagree with something in this first post, then please say which sections and which part of the logic you don't understand or disagree with.
__________________________
Edit, here is some more information. What you do with this information or if you disbelieve it or deny it is up to you. Like they say in the movie the matrix: take the red pill or the blue pill.
The path taken in the picture is a Dog sees 2 dimensional picture.
It interpretes that picture so it changes from 2 dimensions to 3 dimensions.
If the 3 dimensions is not interpreted to 3 dimensions, but looks 3 dimensional, and is still a 2 dimensional picture.
Then how does the brain add the information that this is a 2 dimensional picture it interpretes to 3 dimensions?
It doesn't add that information that the picture is 2 dimensions and it switched it to look like 3 dimensions.
The result is a image that appears to the brain as 3 dimensions, and the brain is wired to operate in 3 dimensions, so the picture becomes reality to the brain.
Then when the person finished watching the 3D movie and rests with the eyes closed, the brain figures out how to operate successfully in the world.
The thoughts treat the movie's environment as someplace that needs to be figured out how to survive and be successful there.
People can lose touch with reality if their brain can't distinguish reality from a movie, and there is the feeblness.
And children who grow up with this are no different and are not immune to how the brain interpretes this 2 d picture as though it were real life 3d.
__________________________
I will describe a test to verify the brain treats 3d differently than 2d when discussing movies.
If you can scan a persons brain while they view both 2D and 3D movies so you could see the regions of the brain that go active, here is what to test.
Show a video of some object moving from one side of the screen to the other or the middle of the screen erratically. Then show that object being thrust towards the viewer or test subject.
Depending on what is shown moving about on the screen the persons brain should show different levels of response: very alert, or amused, etc.
The brain should treat 2d shown on a screen at a distance much differently than a full blown 3d picture than fills the persons view like imax movie screen.
The argument is that the brain becomes used to 3d and eventually responds like 2d. So you would need many different things that move erratically: one test shown a clown, another test shown a lizard, another test shown a small child that needs to be helped to walk, another could show a puppy, etc.
If after many tests with each test showing a different object moving erratically the brain shows it thinks the video is 2d for both the 3d and 2d tests, then 3d is not a problem for healthy adults.
Then, if allowed you could test a child, then a mentally unstable person who takes their medication and is stable.
And if you do this test, publish the results in this thread too so the other people who think 3d is safe can see if they are right or not.
