[jbug]

 http://www.soundandvisionmag.com/fea...-about-6k.html

 

[Gary Murrell]

it is obvious that BD releases made from 4k masters are miles above 2k ones, 6K sounds good to me being the studio has the highest quality master available to them for many years down the road, why not do it if the load can be handled?


Dirty Harry is one of the finest examples of film master perfection that I have seen, if only every title had a 4k master behind it

the master is what makes the release and 2K just doesn't get it done anymore IMHO, I will be anxious to see what comes of this


-Gary

 

[paintit77]

I agree Gary. WB is king in the quality department. They really give a crap about the quality.

FOX/MGM/UA on the other hand need to be schooled by WB on how to do it the right way.

 

[Deviation]



Quote:
Originally Posted by paintit77 /forum/post/14317055


I agree Gary. WB is king in the quality department. They really give a crap about the quality.

Really?


.........Really?

 

[JaylisJayP]



Quote:
Originally Posted by Deviation /forum/post/14319347


Really?


.........Really?

lol, i know right? i would think quite the opposite.

 

[Gary Murrell]

Warner is the finest studio bar none when it comes to print quality, remastering and etc, they really care about their films and keeping them looking good


their films like Casablanca and Maltese Falcon look better than most studios films from the 80's


this is totally beside BD releases, which are IMHO near the top as well, I don't think any other studio could put out a release like Blade Runner or Dirty Harry or The Getaway and have it turn out so friggin amazing


to trash Warner all around for using standard DD on some BD releases equating that to low quality is totally absurd


-Gary