Mark, you’re soon going to need another house just to store all your cameras. 
The battery costs $17 on Amazon. It's a standard Canon-type battery, same as used on the BMPCC 4K and lots of Canon DSLRs except this camera gets 80 minutes from it, not 25. You don't need a recorder like the Ninja V. That is the point. You are recording in the camera to a tiny ssd drive like the little Samsung T5 via usb c, if you want RAW or ProRes. Otherwise the same sd card you use in a GoPro to get 10bit H265 HLG. You can use a little ipod touch as a monitor,touch screen works. Fully articulating. Or you can just use the lcd on the camera, it has one.Out of studio work I don't see who the maker of this camera is aiming at. Both casual shooters and most pros on budget would balk at having to pay significantly more for batteries (not one in the box unless they are Canon users who already have this particular battery), a monitor like the Ninja V or something around that size, and likely some sort of gripping accessories to help with the actual handling of the camera which, in addition to this bare body, would need to have a lens and an external monitor in field shooting.
Though we probably never know for sure about the sensor inside this camera, it looks to be one of the older generation used in older or budget Panasonic and Olympus cameras. Not the one in the 2-year-old Panasonic GH5 or 3-year-old Olympus EM1 Mk2. The latter also has on sensor phase detection AF that along with the recent firmware works superbly on par (in video) with many Canon Dual Pixel AF DSLRs.
I think the price as being offered is deceptive considering the need to make it really useable though the useability with all the said add-ons and cables etc. may vary from one shooter to another.
What video? The only one I have seen that has some competence is this:That video is definitely not 4k, it looks more like effective 720p resolution to me. The sort of thing you might see from older Canon cameras and camcorders from a few years back.
When the youtube video is in focus, its resolution is well above 1080p by my eyes. Did you set the quality to be 2160p on youtube?That video is definitely not 4k, it looks more like effective 720p resolution to me. The sort of thing you might see from older Canon cameras and camcorders from a few years back.
4K on a 4K monitor. The resolution on the OP video is less than HD. It is marginally better than what my G30 (Ninja V recording through the HDMI port, so compression is not an issue) upscaled to 4K looks like, and that camera has an effective resolution of around 700 - 800 lines.When the youtube video is in focus, its resolution is well above 1080p by my eyes. Did you set the quality to be 2160p on youtube?
And the second video? Are we making judgements about the camera's resolution from YouTube compressed videos? What is going on? I am confused (I agree the resolution of that guy's video is terrible).4K on a 4K monitor. The resolution on the OP video is less than HD. It is marginally better than what my G30 (Ninja V recording through the HDMI port, so compression is not an issue) upscaled to 4K looks like, and that camera has an effective resolution of around 700 - 800 lines.
It has an LCD screen! The screen is a little bigger than the one on the Osmo Pocket. And with focus peaking, you know what is in focus (or whether in focus) even using AF (which I use). So, it is very compact, and I can use it just like any of my other toy cameras, without anyone paying much attention - just a little box with a lens (and tiny battery).Without a monitor how do you see what you’re shooting? Actually, how would you even know if you’re holding the camera level?![]()