How does the front of that thing come off? Is the whole front of the speaker plastic? or is it just a plate the tweeter mounts to and the woofers are mounted to the rest of the cabnet?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TjMV3 /forum/post/18118242
The Jamo S606 sell for $600.00 for the pair USD.
The crappy Center Channel and tiny crappy rears make up the $250.00 difference. That's nothing for Jamo to be proud of.
Quote:
Originally Posted by eric-t /forum/post/18118373
Let me first say that sucks when you encounter a blown speaker. Now with that said I have seen high end speakers that have blown a tweeter and or driver. The bottom line is it happens whether it be high or low end. Any mass produced product has a failure rate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by eric-t /forum/post/18120865
So the tweeter isn't blown![]()
Quote:
Originally Posted by TjMV3 /forum/post/18121109
You're missing the point. Yes the tweeter is blown. And we all know that happenes with every manufactor out there. All brands occassionally have a small percentage of defects, here and there.
The main point is the Tweeter itself. Look at it. Take a good, long look at it.
It's a piece of garbage. It's an embarrassment that Jamo would use such dirt cheap, trashy Tweeter in the S606.
Look at the S606. They designed those speakers to look all fancy, glossy, high class. Yet, the tweeter is the type ultra low grade cr*p they use in dirt cheap car stereos. Even worse. It looks like one those cr*ppy tweeters they use in cheap mass market boomboxes or shelf boomboxes, made by Coby or Phillips or RCA or Sony for Wal-mart and K-mart.
That's where the issue lies.
Quote:
Originally Posted by eric-t /forum/post/18121223
I won't argue that it's a sub par tweeter but let's point out again what Paul Scarpelli has said. It's price point is a good value for the money. We wouldn't be here discussing quality if the tweeter hadn't blown in the first placeSo I see the real issue the OP has is the blown tweeter.![]()
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slare /forum/post/18123900
You don't need hockey puck sized motor structures on tweeters anymore. I suspect that in general that tweeter works per it's intended specs and power handling fairly reliably. If you are not happy with that type of driver then do some more research and look into likely more old fashioned speakers with over designed components.
I'm not sticking up for Jamo's quality so much as the snap judgement being made by the appearance of the tweeter itself. There are some similar looking 1" Audax units that happen to be quite excellent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BowerR64 /forum/post/18124705
I agree, the design of the larger driver covers a much larger range so that the tweeter posted doesnt really have to cover much.
You may be over looking another problem, though. What does the crossover look like? maybe somthing else failed causing the damage to the tweeter.
You may replace it and then it happens again but takes your receiver with it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slare /forum/post/18123900
It looks like an Audax type 1" dome. I think you are confusing "junk" with modern engineering / optimization. I can't speak for the particular quality / reliability of that tweeter but there is nothing to be taken from the compact design other than that it is a compact design.
You don't need hockey puck sized motor structures on tweeters anymore. I suspect that in general that tweeter works per it's intended specs and power handling fairly reliably. If you are not happy with that type of driver then do some more research and look into likely more old fashioned speakers with over designed components.
I'm not sticking up for Jamo's quality so much as the snap judgement being made by the appearance of the tweeter itself. There are some similar looking 1" Audax units that happen to be quite excellent.