Originally Posted by BleedOrange11 /forum/post/21760337
All three previews were conversions, and they all looked wonderful.
Originally Posted by cbcdesign /forum/post/21760463
I will believe it when and IF I see it!
John Carter's 3D is not even close to Hugo's quality. It's certainly one of the best-looking conversions to date, but it just doesn't match Scorsese's efforts. I know 3D is very subjective, but I don't understand how a professional movie critic could come up with that opinion.Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyDP /forum/post/21761279
I haven't seen John Carter yet myself but James Verniere of the Boston Herald gave the 3D a glowing review, writing that it was the best looking 3D adventure since Avatar and even calling it better than Hugo.
Originally Posted by AndreHD /forum/post/0
Saw it today, IMAX 3D...I'm giving it 2.9 outta 5 stars. First of all, is this the unofficial sequel to Cowboys and Aliens? Anyway, is it just me, or was the movie incredibly confusing?! There was too many factions, and way to much going on! They lost me halfway through. Who's he? Why's he doing that? What, where, how? I give it a 2.9 for the effects, but you'll be lost the entire time!