Is the RS50 worth the extra $3500? To pay for THX certification, 99 screen presets and 20,000:1 extra CR? Would that extra CR make a very noticeable difference? I'm thinking no. Even if you had the two projectors side-by-side on the same screen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BDD888 /forum/post/20767828
Is the RS50 worth the extra $3500? To pay for THX certification, 99 screen presets and 20,000:1 extra CR? Would that extra CR make a very noticeable difference? I'm thinking no. Even if you had the two projectors side-by-side on the same screen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BDD888 /forum/post/20767828
Is the RS50 worth the extra $3500? To pay for THX certification, 99 screen presets and 20,000:1 extra CR? Would that extra CR make a very noticeable difference? I'm thinking no. Even if you had the two projectors side-by-side on the same screen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by zombie10k /forum/post/20775530
after owning both projectors.. my answer is a solid 'heck no'. save your $$ because the RS50 isn't worth a dollar over the price of an RS40 as far as I'm concerned.
IMO, the current issues with the Gamma and CMS firmly cements the RS50/RS60 as JVC's beta-tester projectors in 2011. I have unfortunately learned first hand from JVC that they are not going to be fixing these issues. Then add in the fact that the RS50 is dimmer than the RS40 and the overall Q/A issues with the lamp for all 3 models.
are you in a rush? you might want to look at the Sony's or at least wait to see if they fixed the outstanding issues in the 2012 models.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BDD888 /forum/post/20775659
No rush at all. Will be buying a new home soon. Will take at least a year to build any how. But I did hear the JVC's are "the best on the market". And the cost of the RS40 even at list isn't that bad at just under 5k USD.
Didn't know the RS40 actually out performs the RS50/60. Though, I suppose the only obvious difference might be the 100,000:1 CR. 50,000:1 isn't bad all already.
Originally Posted by Daniel Hutnicki ![]() By the time you are ready to buy, there will be a whole new line of Sony and JVC projectors. By that time, JVC will have fixed all the issues |
Quote:
Originally Posted by zombie10k /forum/post/20775736
long story short.. don't believe the marketing materials. The RS50/RS60 had the potential to become their flagships once again (like the RS25/RS35) but a series of unfortunate events unfolded with the mid/high end 2011 models.
Quote:
And if so...do you think the RS50 replacement will be worth worth the extra coin over the RS40 replacement? Assuming the specs are the same as they are now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shagg /forum/post/20779850
I still think JVC pulled a joke on us this year and flipped their numbering system. In 2011, the RS40 is the high end model.![]()
Quote:
Originally Posted by BDD888 /forum/post/20767828
Is the RS50 worth the extra $3500? To pay for THX certification, 99 screen presets and 20,000:1 extra CR? Would that extra CR make a very noticeable difference I'm thinking no. Even if you had the two projectors side-by-side on the same screen.?
Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryChanin /forum/post/20797858
Hi,
Official JVC RS-50 Owner's Thread, Posting#3671
Larry
Quote:
Originally Posted by u2andpj /forum/post/0
Would you buy a HD950 for $5300, RS35 for $6400, or an RS40 for $4500? I don't care about 3D. I just care about 2D image quality in a completely dark 8 lounge chair home theater on a 120" screen. I also will have a Pioneer Elite SC35 receiver with the Marvell chip for video processing. I currently have a 720p SIM2 C3X DLP projector (orig MSP $20K). Or should I just wait another 6 months for the new models?