Darryl, I have owned the Paradigm studio 60's with the Servo-15 sub. and the Klipsch RF-3II's with the SVS 16-46Pci sub .(with the complementing speakers to make a 5.1 system). I can tell you that the sound is different by a pretty large margin. I would summarize by saying that, to my ears. The Paradigms were better for 2 channel and surround music, in that they had a better sound stage and more smoothness between the tweeter and the midrange. The Klipschs were better for HT as the dialog was noticeably clearer. the Klipsch were more directional (a good thing for HT) and, IMHO lacked a smooth transition between the tweeter and the midbass creating a discernable hole in the upper mid-bass. I NEVER thought the Klipschs were fatiguing or harsh. they didn't present as much sibilance with "s" as the Paradigms did. The best advise is to LISTEN to both at length. It is also more revealing if you can audition one right after the other with as short a time span between listening as possible. I liked both, but, since I watch more movies than listen to music, I preferred the Klipsch. By the way, the SVS sub outmatched the Servo-15 in every way I could test. I have heard Klipsch subs, but, have not been too impressed. If you go with Paradigm, their subs are much better than Klipsch. Have fun in your search, Dennis