Quote:
Uther,
Shifting doesn't change the masking requirement.
It just shifts the relative position of the projector with respect to the screen - so that you can get it out of the
way.
Imagine a PJ with zero offset - the PJ would have to be centered with the screen - which would put it in the way.
That's why most PJs have a 50% offset - puts the projector at the top of the screen, out of the way.
Originally posted by Uther So, is the desire to have lens shift in a projector that one could always have the picture aligned with either the top or bottom of the screen? My guess is this is important in that you would only have to mask three sides of the image and you would have the ability to make minute adjustment to align the picture with the screen? |
Shifting doesn't change the masking requirement.
It just shifts the relative position of the projector with respect to the screen - so that you can get it out of the
way.
Imagine a PJ with zero offset - the PJ would have to be centered with the screen - which would put it in the way.
That's why most PJs have a 50% offset - puts the projector at the top of the screen, out of the way.