AVSForum Tech Talk Podcast with Scott Wilkinson Click here for details.
Enter to be our Home Theater of the Month Click here for details.
Doesn't HCFR create a 3x3 when it profiles a meter? E.g., I had a calibrator profile my Display 3 against his Minolta (in Calman which now just doesn't work for me), and then a forum member created that 3x3 file for me for use in HCFR, so I assume when HCFR calibrates a meter it provides a 3x3? Or is there no meter profiling option in it?Really happy to see this dedicated space.
I have been fighting with my setup for a while and don't get pleasing results. After a seemingly successful SD calibration where Calman showed very good post calibration results I noticed that the picture was definitely off. I started to blame my i1 Display Pro for that and since then I have been on a journey getting a i1Pro2 to profile the i1D3. However even with that it turns out it's not quite satisfying. So my most recent idea was to generate a 3x3 matrix in some other software (like HCFR or DisplayCal) and manually import that profile into Calman. Reason is that the Agryll Drivers support 3nm mode whereas the the original drivers used in Calman only support 10nm mode. I was hoping that this would improve accuracy of my I1D3 and hopefully solve the issues. Of course this is just speculation at this point but I don't have and can't afford any more accurate meter... Unfortunately I haven't been able to find any instructions on how to create the data for a 3x3 matrix in any of the other programs so I could use it in Calman. Any suggestions on that?
Otherwise if the i1D3 is accurate enough, maybe something in the workflow or software (either Proj. or Calman) is broken? I have noticed some other people experiencing similar issues on a German forum, too. Looking forward to a dedicated PJ workflow for sure...
Last but not least it seems the LG pattern gen is somewhat limited for HDR so that a pre- post check is not available. Is there any pattern Gen alternative that would avoid that issue? I tried MobileForge but not sure it is accurate enough on a FireTV Cube. Would it work for HDR anyways? PCgen also has limitation wrt HDR and would need an external HDfury for putting into HDR mode... Any other options?
I noticed the same thing, actually I was struggling with saturation/tint/lightness on several of the colors. Something seems wonky about the CMS in this thing (and probably many TV's for that matter!). The last time I tried, the CMS adjustments only showed an impact after having to go to extremes, so just decided not to.the luminance controls do not work in the CMS.
Greg - while youre here, I'm curious, what did you use for patterns for the odd code values the PJ uses in HDR? Ie., do you know what IRE's these correspond to?the luminance controls do not work in the CMS.
Good, but not good. I also noticed the Luminance controls do nothing. I'm doing grayscale calibrations only as my attempts to calibrate CMS made things worse, even though my sweeps in Calman show "more colour accuracy".I noticed the same thing, actually I was struggling with saturation/tint/lightness on several of the colors. Something seems wonky about the CMS in this thing (and probably many TV's for that matter!). The last time I tried, the CMS adjustments only showed an impact after having to go to extremes, so just decided not to.
Maybe it is because the basic meter I'm using even though it's profiled, doesn't read colors well enough from 4 or so feet away?
HDR code values don't really correspond to IRE as that is a measurement from SDR analog video days and is a reference to voltage.Greg - while youre here, I'm curious, what did you use for patterns for the odd code values the PJ uses in HDR? Ie., do you know what IRE's these correspond to?
22pt HDR Code Values: 1023, 719, 704, 687, 672, 656, 640, 624, 609, 592, 577, 561, 545, 529, 513, 497, 464, 429, 359, 324, 289, 254.
Aren't code values in all the LG OLED's now too? I.e., I thought I read somewhere that folks had corresponding patterns for each code value, maybe the Masciola (sp.) thread?HDR code values don't really correspond to IRE as that is a measurement from SDR analog video days and is a reference to voltage.
Ah, I just though it would be "97.5% IRE" vs 100 sort of thing, but guess IRE is more specific..Yes, they are. It's "IRE" that doesn't apply...