AVS Forum banner
1 - 20 of 40 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
13 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Hi All,


I recently bought a Mitsubishi HC-4000 to replace my Infocus SP4800 with a dim bulb and first stages of the light tunnel issue. The quality of the HC-4000 is a huge step up in all categories. However as I said in another thread there is a noticeable screen uniformity problem in all white or all black screens. With the upper right being lighter with a green cast compared with darker and a red-ish cast to the lower left (ceiling mounted).


Also the Mitsubishi seems to vibrate a bit on the mount causing the picture to shake just enough to notice. I'm using a Chief RPA mount bolted into solid concrete, so it's definitely secure =)


Anyway, I'm going to have to return it so I was thinking about other choices as well. Overall the picture on the HC-4000 is great, but a few nitpicks are noticeable noise in solid color areas and good but not great absolute black levels.


I'm considering the Panasonic AE-4000, mainly for the 2.35:1 option or the JVC HD-250 for the black levels.


- Will I be happy with the AE-4000 overall picture quality and brightness compared with the Mitsubishi. I like the pop yet natural look DLP picture on the Mitsubishi.


- Would the JVC's better black levels and hopefully lower mosquito noise justify the stretching of the budget.


- The uniformity problem and vibration with the Mitsubishi is giving me some pause as the QC on the Mitsubishi units.


Thanks!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
685 Posts
I would (and did) pick the JVC over the Panny. The JVC is brighter and has more depth to the image. It throws a really stunning picture. I have not seen the mits to compare but have seen the panny in person.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
13 Posts
Discussion Starter · #4 ·
Hmm, choices, choices. I think I'd be happy with the Mitsubishi if the uniformity was fixed with a new unit. Dropping another $1700 for the JVC although doable, seems a bit extravagant. I noticed the JVC has a powered lens shift and zoom like the AE-4000. Why in the world didn't implement lens memory, it should be just a firmware function and a simple one at that. Seems like on the JVC you could getto up something with a multi step macro on a universal remote to switch back between zoomed CH 2.35:1 and 16:9. Anyone tried this?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
504 Posts
I'm considering the JVC HD250 and the Mits 4000 also. After reading lots of threads I have concern over the following for both and others (Epson's) --


Everybody raves about the Epson's 8350 or 8700 picture but we don't really hear raves about the JVC (except on projector.com). It's like there are two different types of people who buy these. I would like to hear raves about the JVC but mostly we hear it has great blacks but it is most likely not usable in a lighted environment.


I actually went to a local dealer to see the Epson 8350 but he had a 9500 mounted. To me I could not live with the picture quality of that unit after living with an NEC DLP for the last 8 years. In thx mode the skin tones had a blue tint in them and the bright mode just washed out the color. This was their installer tech demoing it to me also. MM just posted some shots of an Epson and I see some of the same things in those shots. I guess it's definitely DLP or DILA for me.


Back to the JVC vs Mits


JVC pros -- blacks, contrast

JVC cons-- brightness (in lighted environment) , sharpness??


Mits pros -- brightness, sharpness, contrast??

Mits cons -- blacks, ??, quality control


So I guess we choose our favorite. Personally, I have a dark room so I'm so close to ordering the JVC but have a slight concern over the brightness and sharpness. Can an owner here tell me I have nothing to worry about regarding these two items.


Also, I haven't heard a word about quality control problems with JVC's. Do owners agree?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
75 Posts
A month ago I was about to place an order for the Panny 4000. But there were things that concerned me. Like light output. And dust blobs. The HD-250 doesn't have these issues.


The bottom line is that the technology used on the HD-250 (LCoS) is superior to regular LCD. Up until now, many picked an LCD simply because it is cheaper. The HD-250 has changed that.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,841 Posts
In best mode the 250 kills the 8500 in brightness by a good bit. In the brightest mode the 8500 wins. The 250 is a big step up from the 8500 (which I had). As a poster mentioned no dust blobs or minimal chance. The only advantage I see with the Epson is the overnight replacement if your projector goes in for repair.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
22 Posts
Sounds like we are all in same boat. I was going to buy the panny 4k but now the jvc really has my interest. I watch equal amounts of sports, movies and gaming so along with sharpness I also am concerned with motion blur. Does anyone have any input on which projector would handle sports and gaming better? I would suspect the jvc would win out on movies. Thanks for any input.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
685 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by tyee /forum/post/19566872


Everybody raves about the Epson's 8350 or 8700 picture but we don't really hear raves about the JVC (except on projector.com). It's like there are two different types of people who buy these. I would like to hear raves about the JVC but mostly we hear it has great blacks but it is most likely not usable in a lighted environment.

Thats because us JVC owners spend more time enjoying our projectors than justifying our purchases. The JVC has not been a top rated projector for no reason. The raves are definitely out there.


P.S. My RS10 and 110" Dalite HP 2.8 screen combo is VERY usable in a lighted enviroinment. I just watched the Grey Cup ( Canada's Superbowl ) with a fair bit of lighting on and the picture was stunning.


As for reliability, I bought my RS10 from AVS which means I would have to ship it to the states for any warranty and I am not regretting that decision at all.



C'mon everyone, get off that fence and get one of these projectors so you too can have affordable video nirvana
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
387 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by advgeek /forum/post/19563146


Hi All,


I recently bought a Mitsubishi HC-4000 to replace my Infocus SP4800 with a dim bulb and first stages of the light tunnel issue. The quality of the HC-4000 is a huge step up in all categories. However as I said in another thread there is a noticeable screen uniformity problem in all white or all black screens. With the upper right being lighter with a green cast compared with darker and a red-ish cast to the lower left (ceiling mounted).


Also the Mitsubishi seems to vibrate a bit on the mount causing the picture to shake just enough to notice. I'm using a Chief RPA mount bolted into solid concrete, so it's definitely secure =)


Anyway, I'm going to have to return it so I was thinking about other choices as well. Overall the picture on the HC-4000 is great, but a few nitpicks are noticeable noise in solid color areas and good but not great absolute black levels.


I'm considering the Panasonic AE-4000, mainly for the 2.35:1 option or the JVC HD-250 for the black levels.


- Will I be happy with the AE-4000 overall picture quality and brightness compared with the Mitsubishi. I like the pop yet natural look DLP picture on the Mitsubishi.


- Would the JVC's better black levels and hopefully lower mosquito noise justify the stretching of the budget.


- The uniformity problem and vibration with the Mitsubishi is giving me some pause as the QC on the Mitsubishi units.


Thanks!

If you really have the cash....buy the HD250. Best blacks at its price range, Period.


If you don't want to spend that much cash, then go with the Panny AE4000. It will give you better blacks than the Mitsubishi. But if you want more pop!, I suggest you consider the Epson 8700UB! Its a better value than the Panny AE4000 and from what I've read it has better blacks, shadow detail and color balance than the Panny. It also has a longe warranty and has a free lamp cupon.


None of them will be as bright as the Mits hc4000. All of them were geared towards a light controlled home theater room. The Mits...although could work just as well for that application, its more geared towards a family or bonus room with a little more ambient light.


Again....if you have the cash go for the hd250 or the Epson 8700
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
22 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by tyee /forum/post/19574669


RodK and eliwankenobi

I jumped....floating now. Hope I never land! JVC from AVS coming when restocked. This was a really hard decision.

Congrats! I am on the edge! I am coming from a panny 900 so I know I will be pleased. Ijust want to make sure I make the right decision.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
603 Posts
The 2.35:1 feature the ae4000 has was the deciding factor for me.


I can't believe the others have not implemented it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
137 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by shaneotool /forum/post/19575933


The 2.35:1 feature the ae4000 has was the deciding factor for me.


I can't believe the others have not implemented it.

Apparently it is implemented in the Epson 21000 which is imminent. I'm holding off waiting for that. Non powered zoom options aren't in my list to consider.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
685 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by tyee /forum/post/19572789


Right on Rodk

I've been reading about the HP 2.8 screen too. I believe it's now 2.4 correct? Do they make a pulldown version?

You can still request the 2.8 material in a pull down at no extra cost.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
387 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by tyee /forum/post/19574669


RodK and eliwankenobi

I jumped....floating now. Hope I never land! JVC from AVS coming when restocked. This was a really hard decision.

Congratulations on your purchase!!


Please post your impressions when you get it!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
13 Posts
Discussion Starter · #20 ·
Just ordered the JVC HD-250. I'm really stoked. The HC4000 was a nice step up from my old Infocus but it will be nice to hopefully get a projector in the JVC without any image issues that distract from the viewing experience. Ideally one should forget about the projector all together when your watching.
 
1 - 20 of 40 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top