AVS Forum banner
  • Take part in a short activity and share your valuable opinion on new design concepts for AVSForum! >>> Click Here
  • Our native mobile app has a new name: Fora Communities. Learn more.

My First Screen: DIY Black Flame! Review and Pics

1829 Views 21 Replies 10 Participants Last post by  Marc G
Hey all-


I bought a 4805 during the Staples black Friday deal and decided to build my own DIY screen. Over the past 3 months it seemed that there were great strides made in ambient light paint formulations. My room has some ambient light issues, making something like CG, BigLyle, or the BFLF mixes perfect for my situation. I was going to go with Beven's formulation but being a sucker for the mysterious and forbidden I decided to PM Pbmaxx and see if I could get a hold of the Black Flame mix. Finally got to rolling the screen Sunday and did some preliminary critical viewing tonight.


My Setup:


My room (bedroom) is ~20' x 14' x 9' with two large windows opposite of the screen spanning the whole width of my room.


The projector is the 4805, basic calibrations performed with Avia Video Essentials.


The screen after the boarder is 52" wide and about 57" diagnal (or thereabouts).



Making the screen:


I had no access to a sprayer, so I decided to roll the screen. This is the first time I've ever rolled anything, so bear that in mind. I used as my substrate an unprimed white melamine Do-able board 1/8" thick mounted on a table top stand I build myself (yes, I am very proud, even though its a bit crooked here and there).


Rolling:


Plan A:


I used a reddish colored 3/16th" 9" roller made for smooth surfaces. Started rolling. Eek, bad roller marks. Double Eek: the damn thing shedded all over the place. Yeah, red pieces of whatever all over the screen. Not good. Grabbed one of my towells out of my bathroom and wiped off the entire screen....


Plan B:


I also bought 2 foam rollers made for smooth surfaces. Opened the first package and there was some huge inch worm thing crawling on it--yeah, not a big "bug person" so that roller went into the trash.


Plan B.2:


Used the second foam 9" roller. Surface went on smoother, but again bad roller marks. This might have been worsened by the fact I was painting straight onto the melamine surface. Let that sit for about 30 minutes. Yikes, the roller marks! This is no good so onto....


Plan C:


I also bought a ultrafoam trim roller from HD (I tend to buy multiple backups of items from HD due to my lacking of the 'handy man' gene). I rolled on a coat of the BF mix with the trim roller. MUCH better. Went on extremely with little or no marks. There were still marks from the first layer, but after 3 more layers, the roller marks were gone and I had a fairly smooth, uniform surface......until as I was mounting it it dropped on my head creating a big mark on the screen, so I went with a fourth layer of BF:)


Miscelaneous Notes:


The mix is light-mid gray/bluegray (by my eyes).

Very easy to roll once you know what you're doing. Use a trim roller.

I tried to use as little paint as possible for each layer.

I waited 30"+ for each layer and another 24 hours before I took pictures.


Disclaimer:


The way I did the black flame mix was not optimal. Its apparently best sprayed and using a mirror as a substrate (the LF part of BFLF). I'm also using a lower lumen projector and this is the absolute first time I've rolled paint or made a screen. I think my review is still valuable because it sets sort of the lower range of what's acheivable with the BF mix. Using a sprayer and a mirror and a higher-end projector should only IMPROVE your results. However, I believe there are many out there like me in this situation. In any event there's are my preliminary results YMMV.


Screen shots (A/B with a plain Do-able board):

http://bigdaddycadillac.com/img/ss1.JPG

http://bigdaddycadillac.com/img/ss2.JPG

http://bigdaddycadillac.com/img/ss3.JPG

http://bigdaddycadillac.com/img/ss4.JPG

http://bigdaddycadillac.com/img/ss5.JPG

http://bigdaddycadillac.com/img/ss6.JPG

http://bigdaddycadillac.com/img/ss7.JPG

http://bigdaddycadillac.com/img/ss8.JPG


These are just some random images from the Dicovery Channel HD comcast cable feed as well as a Hi-Def Leno broadcast (I believe). I'm using the component connection and a Moto 6412 DVR box. I know these aren't the preferential 5th element or Finding Nemo pics, but they'll have to do for now.


Light situation:


I have 4 overhead recessed lights--I think they're 75W each and a table lamp right behind the projector--another 75W. Its pretty bright. I don't know how to quantify it besides pretty bright. I used a strip of unpainted Do-Able as the reference. I'm also using a ND2 filter, which cuts the brightness in half. One of the overhead recessed lights falls on the left side of the screen--so if it looks light there more ambient light on the left of the screen that's because there is;)


Subjective observations:


Black levels are improved anywhere from moderately to dramtically depending on the scene. White levels suffer a bit when compared to the "clean" whites of the do-able board. This isn't surprising since the BF is gray. But you ONLY really notice it when you do a direct A/B comparison. Once I take the do-able away, within a minute or two my eyes adjust and the whites in the BF mix seem very white. I'm sure this is pretty typical of many of your experiences. In bright scenes the colors seem a bit muted. I just took off the ND2 filter and the colors seem a bit more vibrant--more pop so-to-speak. Overall with the lights on on a scale of 1 to 10, in my hands with my situation I'd give it a solid 7.


I think more critical viewing is in order with some good DVDs or HD broadcasts--something like the Fifth Element or Nemo or Gladiator or whatever else. I just wanted to put up quick and dirty pics to get things started. My camera is a Casio EX-Z750. Many shots were with a mini tripod, but they are untouched processing wise. I should mention that in the dark, there isn't a whole lot of difference between the Do-able and BF screen, which is generally a good thing. Differences in whites and lighter fleshtones are still noticable, but only minimally. One thing that I found interesting is that the black levels are still improved in the dark with the BF mix. I have white walls in my bedroom, so maybe there is a minimal amount of ambient light from reflections. But I thought this was pretty cool since I didn't expect improved black levels in the dark.


Sorry for the mediocre pics and the rambling post. Its late so I might have forgotten some important info. If anyone has any questions or pic requests I'd be happy to accomodate. Big thanks to Pbmaxx and MM. They were both extremely helpful over PM and patient with my neverending stream of questions.


Matt
See less See more
Status
Not open for further replies.
1 - 20 of 22 Posts
Matt,


A very through and evenly done review.


Glad your happy with your results. As those painted coats cure further, they'll improve with some 'aging', so you can look forward to that as well.


Your mistart is indicative of how something with Red Hair can lead you into trouble. :D


Your further experience shows how important it really is to follow the best pro-offered advice from the start. I've advocated "Spraying Only" for quite a while, but when a DIY Mix can be made as thin as BFLF can be, then the use of a hard Foam "Trim Roller" works amazingly well, and is something most everybody can obtain and use without to much undue fear of failure.


Most everybody. All that is required is that they take a cheap paint, thin it coparitively, and practice rolling just a bit before committing to a surface they want impeccably smooth.
See less See more
Thanks for sharing!

What camera/settings were used for those shots?
Matt, why not contact bunker plastics, via e-mail, request a sample of plexi mirror, roll a thin layer on the mirror and see if theres a visible difference.
Matt,


good work. i wanted to ask you about the nd2 filter... as you said...

I just took off the ND2 filter and the colors seem a bit more vibrant--more pop so-to-speak.


were those pics taken with or without the ND2 filter on? and now that you've taken the ND2 filter off... giving the colors in the blame flame mix more pop and vibrancy... what are you final impressions? i take it you'll be leaving the ND2 filter off from on... which what another avs member expressed to me that they were hoping to achieve with this mix as well.


it's actually surprising how much difference you can show using just a sp4805 running in low mode with an ND2 filter.

heck, you are pushin' maybe 350-400 lumen MAXX :) and even though MM & I have been advocating that black flame really begins to shine somewhere around 850+ lumens... you've shown that it's good for low lumen PJ's too. I honestly did not think your PJ would bring out and make of use the metallics as well as it did.


-maxx
See less See more
Quote:
and even though MM & I have been advocating that blame flame really begins to shine somewhere around 850+ lumens...
Freudian slip? ;)


The screen looks great! Nice to see this stuff in action. Great review.

graffixjones said:
Freudian slip? ;)


no not at all. i'm commending him.


sorry matt, i can't type worth a lick. i'll edit it. :eek:
looks good. it seems like with such a tiny screen though you would have good results no matter what - brightness from the projector would be so high.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pb_maxxx
Matt,


good work. i wanted to ask you about the nd2 filter... as you said...

I just took off the ND2 filter and the colors seem a bit more vibrant--more pop so-to-speak.


were those pics taken with or without the ND2 filter on? and now that you've taken the ND2 filter off... giving the colors in the blame flame mix more pop and vibrancy... what are you final impressions? i take it you'll be leaving the ND2 filter off from on... which what another avs member expressed to me that they were hoping to achieve with this mix as well.


it's actually surprising how much difference you can show using just a sp4805 running in low mode with an ND2 filter.

heck, you are pushin' maybe 350-400 lumen MAXX :) and even though MM & I have been advocating that black flame really begins to shine somewhere around 850+ lumens... you've shown that it's good for low lumen PJ's too. I honestly did not think your PJ would bring out and make of use the metallics as well as it did.


-maxx


The pictures are with the ND2 filter ON. I took it off and I think I like the vibrancy of the colors better now. The black levels might suffer a bit accross the board, but I think ND2 filter off is the best compromise.....at least for now.


The reason I wasn't too woried about the lumens is my throw distance is probably 8 feet max and my screen is only 52" wide. So even in lower power mode the image on the plain do-able was seriously bright (it actually gave me a headache and made my eyes hurt).


The camera is a Casio Exilim EX-Z750 using the quick shot mode and auto focus. I have the Exif data if you want to see it. Some pics have a little bit of optical (no digital) zoom.


Yeah, getting a sample of a mirror might be a good idea. I only used 2/3 of a quart of paint for 4 layers of BF (and remember I wiped one layer off because of the roller shedding).
See less See more
Quote:
Originally Posted by mawst95
The pictures are with the ND2 filter ON. I took it off and I think I like the vibrancy of the colors now. )
good to hear.

So even in lower power mode the image on the plain do-able was seriously bright (it actually gave me a headache and made my eyes hurt).


in ambient light... a bright blurr can give anyone a headache. ;)


in manys ways... you had some poor conditions to start with... wanting increased black levels, and increased ambient light, with a low lumen pj in low power mode, using an ND2 filter, and rolling a mix design for a mirror on a non-mirrored surface. it was bound for failure. so it's good to hear a good report.


enjoy your screen... and...


Merry Christmas to you.
See less See more
I'm guessing you used the low lumen formula? I have the 4805 also, and am still debating screen choices. Maxxmudd LL seems to be in the front running, as light controlled image and ease are my two main points for now. I'm still thinking about the BF and LF also. Maybe dual screens?


Good early review, and keep us posted.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mawst95
Yeah, getting a sample of a mirror might be a good idea. I only used 2/3 of a quart of paint for 4 layers of BF (and remember I wiped one layer off because of the roller shedding).
I am not sure where in California you are at, but I have some pieces of plexi-mirror that I wouldn't mind donating to the cause. Even though I have a BFLF screen I wouldn't mind seeing a comparison of the two.


If you are in the LA area somewhere shoot me a PM.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gprro1
I'm guessing you used the low lumen formula? I have the 4805 also, and am still debating screen choices. Maxxmudd LL seems to be in the front running, as light controlled image and ease are my two main points for now. I'm still thinking about the BF and LF also. Maybe dual screens?


Good early review, and keep us posted.
I actually have no idea which mix I got? PBmaxx? Do you know? LOL!
Quote:
Originally Posted by dangc
I am not sure where in California you are at, but I have some pieces of plexi-mirror that I wouldn't mind donating to the cause. Even though I have a BFLF screen I wouldn't mind seeing a comparison of the two.


If you are in the LA area somewhere shoot me a PM.
San Fran unfortunately.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pb_maxxx
good to hear.

So even in lower power mode the image on the plain do-able was seriously bright (it actually gave me a headache and made my eyes hurt).


in ambient light... a bright blurr can give anyone a headache. ;)


in manys ways... you had some poor conditions to start with... wanting increased black levels, and increased ambient light, with a low lumen pj in low power mode, using an ND2 filter, and rolling a mix design for a mirror on a non-mirrored surface. it was bound for failure. so it's good to hear a good report.


enjoy your screen... and...


Merry Christmas to you.
Yeah, not to insult myself, but I think my results indicate the lower-end of what can be acheived. I think using a higher lumen projector, on a mirror, using a sprayer will only INCREASE your results. I think, however, my results have value because I'm sure there are many out there that just want to roll their $14.99 Do-Abl or MDF and don't have a lot of experience but are worried about their results.


I should also add this is my first projector and I'm coming from a 32" sony trinitron HDTV. I'm not a videophile by any means.
See less See more
Quote:
Originally Posted by mawst95
I actually have no idea which mix I got? PBmaxx? Do you know? LOL!
Matt asked for the regular (or darker) of the two black flame mixes. i was hestitant to do so, but he indicated that he was using a filter to cut down on the brightness... so i went ahead and sent him the regular black flame mix.


Dangc, however, indicated that due to his sony PJ... he is using the black flame lite mix. obviously, the difference would be... the lite version has slightly less ambient viewing, and greater controlled viewing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pb_maxxx
in manys ways... you had some poor conditions to start with... wanting increased black levels, and increased ambient light, with a low lumen pj in low power mode, using an ND2 filter, and rolling a mix design for a mirror on a non-mirrored surface. it was bound for failure.
Not if you consider that at 52" wide, his image is equal in brightness to a 1000+ lumen pj doing 48" x 85". Heck, I've never seen something like plain do-able look as good under ambient light as the do-able in his photos.
and yet... even at only 8 feet... to see that much of a difference is pretty stark... and with the ND2 filter on no less.


now put the PJ back to 16ft and reshoot this test to a 48x85 screen and the do-able would likely be dead.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pb_maxxx
and yet... even at only 8 feet... to see that much of a difference is pretty stark... and with the ND2 filter on no less.


now put the PJ back to 16ft and reshoot this test to a 48x85 screen and the do-able would likely be dead.
Tru dat. Even though the difference is stark, the BF screen is still unwatchable in those lighting conditions according to these screenshots. If apologies are made for the low lumen projector, one might think the picture would be acceptable with a higher lumen pj. But that's only if that higher lumen pj is also putting up a small image.


Not to mention, the ND2's whole purpose with a 4805 is to reduce the brightness because some users feel it's too bright... and that on a larger screen.
but it also might be cutting down enough lumens to make it more watchable.

350 lumens is quite low even at 8 feet.

matt did say that the vividness increased when he took the filter off. i'd be interested in seeing some full screen shots of the black flame screen in that same lighting.


i gotta admit... matt is brave enough to show his screen in more amount of light than just about everybody else i've seen.


then again we are both being arm chair quarterbacks here... only matt has a real feel of how much more watchable his screen is now than before.


matt?
See less See more
1 - 20 of 22 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top