No, 46" is way too small for 3D. I watch 3D on my 82" DLP 10' away and am considering the Mitsubishi 92" when it becomes available soon. DLPs have no burn in and no crosstalk and the best value for the money.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wessew10 /forum/post/20850349
I would step back a bit. Ask yourself whether this is a mature technology and do you want to invest in it before it is well seasoned. I am in your position but I have decided to wait a year or two. There is really no rush here with content being so limited. And there is always the risk this technology goes the way of quadraphonic sound, 8 track tapes and laser discs. I have a big collection of those! In all seriousness, if you can wait a couple of years after introduction: 1) you can better tell whether the technology is going to stick, 2) you will benefit from lower prices, 3) you will benefit from much higher quality and 4) you will avoid getting involved with the wrong platform or technology. A prime example: HD-DVD vs. Blu-ray...
Originally Posted by David_B Brighter is better. The best 3D TV is LCD/LED. They are the brightest, and have the least crosstalk. While I like my non-3d projector, I can't imagine how dark the picture would look with 3d active shutter glasses on. The only way to overcome that is a high gain screen, which you won't be able to use in 2d since it will hotspot like crazy, and give you very poor contrast. No thanks. |