AVS Forum banner
  • Our native mobile app has a new name: Fora Communities. Learn more.

NEC XG: Optimum Screen Size

716 Views 17 Replies 7 Participants Last post by  YONEXSP
Hi all,



I have the following, and want to know the optimum screen size, whilst optimizing the raster:


Throw Distance: 131"

PJ: XG 110

AR: 16:9


I seem to be able to get a bigger picture (than suggested) while using more of the Raster, but perhaps I am getting it to close to the edge. I have used the screen calculator software, and it tells me 119" 4:3 diagonal or that should translate to 109" 16:9 Diagonnal. But this seems to leave more raster to use.


Do I reduce the Raster width & not worry to much about it?


Suggestions welcome.


Br Ken./
See less See more
Status
Not open for further replies.
1 - 18 of 18 Posts
YONEXSP,

I don't know the answer, but I do know GN2 was looking for some tubes. Maybe you can trade tubes for help. Here is the thread http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...hreadid=511255


Ericglo
I reckon about 107 wide (not diagonal), based on a mate's XG throw.
G'day Ken,


I am running a XG-1350 with HD144 lenses and have my throw distance ( measured horizontally from screen to centre of green lens ) set at 1.2375 times the screen width ie. 99 inch throw for an 80 inch wide image.


My normal screen res for watching movies and TV is 1440 x 810 x 50Hz in a 16:9 format. Note that I am using a HTPC and have been quite aggressive with the front and back horizontal porch settings to achieve this. As you go up in refresh rate and horizontal res it becomes more difficult to maintain that short throw distance ratio because you run out of horizontal image size adjustment.


So on my setup and using your 131 inch throw I could show a 105.8 inch wide image ( 121.5 diagonal in 16:9 format ).


I wouldn't advocate trying to eek out any more phosphur usage than this though, as you start to degrade edge focus at these extremes ( still quite acceptable though if you've got a solid astig & focus setup ). Extreme edge and corner convergence can also be a challenge when pushing the limits.


My suggestion would be to increase the width control and see how wide you can go. That will set the upper limit , assumming you don't have control over your porch settings.


Cheers :)


Russ
See less See more
Thx,


I got roughly the same figure, but i think I will try & match the setup in the instructions as much as possible. So I am going to go with a 110" Diagonal or 96" width.


I hope this will lessen any setup problems later.


Br Ken./
Remember that the other mechanical setup items are even MORE important than the exact throw distance. Make sure the projector is absolutely level, centered on the screen, and exactly perpendicular to the screen.
thx,


Have done, used a Level & laser etc to get it as good as I can. Can't say for sure 100% it is 100% perfect, but I can't get it any closer at this point.


Br Ken./
I reckon your nuts Br Ken.


There's a reason why NECs have tiny little wear patterns when installed professionally - the setup tables are wrong/ultra conservative.


For a start they are wrong for 16:9 screens - due to the trapezoid shape of the raster, a 4:3 image of the same width is bigger on the tubeface. Meaning for a 16:9 raster you need to go wider.


Then the tables are setup to avoid lawsuits, not to optimise performance.


I've seen Russ' setup, and believe me the image is nothing short of stunning. The XG will handle this throw distance, there's even another thread with a few guys with a cumulative total of 10,000hrs with maximised raster.


It's your XG, but in my opinion you are hobbling it.


If your not going to listen, why did you ask? At least go for 100" wide, or play around with your source and see how wide you can get it - don't blindly follow the manual.


Mark
See less See more
Quote:
Originally posted by YONEXSP
Thx,


I got roughly the same figure, but i think I will try & match the setup in the instructions as much as possible. So I am going to go with a 110" Diagonal or 96" width.


I hope this will lessen any setup problems later.


Br Ken./
DON'T use the book's figures for the screen size or you'll BURN a small wear pattern and you'll be sorry later on. Us AS MUCH of the tube face as you can (within 1/8" of the horizontal edges of the tube) and put the projector where you want it and size the screen to that.
See less See more
Thx Guys,


So far I have 96" wide with a 110" Diagonal. I'll try & move the beast, but it is a bugger once it is setup. I can probably mobe it 5 inces closer, so giving me more raster usage.


Gulp, Tiz not easy eh!


I am using a HTPC, so I have reduced the Front & Back porch to the max of the Raster I am using. But by the sounds of it I can use more raster.


Br Ken./
See less See more
p.s Mark, kinda harsh that last comment. I am listening, I am also just learning, so when I see good advice I will take it.
Got your attention though didn't it ;)


I'm sorry, it was a bit harsh. I would stick it where Russ says to. I wouldn't go quite as far as Bruce suggests - it's not a G70!


Can you make the screen wider instead?


Mark
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark_A_W
Got your attention though didn't it ;)



Mark
lol :D :p :D
Quote:
Originally posted by YONEXSP
I am using a HTPC, so I have reduced the Front & Back porch to the max of the Raster I am using. But by the sounds of it I can use more raster.
Hey Ken ....


now that I know you're using a HTPC, I've attached the powerstrip setting I use for PAL and NTSC (film based) DVD playback. Try these and see how they go on your system. I have a nice black cave of a theatre and hense use the 47.952 refresh rate for NTSC and don't notice any apparent flicker.


When I was setting up my 135 I chose to exceed the factory voltage setting for horizontal output transistor calibration at a whisker above standard, but still within the variance allowed. Consequently, for the PAL setting below my image width setting ( projector ) is at +41 and for the NTSC setting it's at +61. There still a bit of leeway left in the NTSC settings though if you want to try reducing the porch settings further.


Here's a tip: connect the PC to a multiscan monitor, turn up brightness to max and then squish the horizontal/vertical size so you can see the raster extremes. Bring up a full screen test pattern and adjust powerstrip porches until the 'image' is centred within the raster. Works for me!

PAL Settings -- 1440 x 810 x 50hz

----------------------------------------------------------------------

PowerStrip timing parameters:

1440x810=1440,7,152,113,810,6,11,13,71902,1


Generic timing details for 1440x810:

HFP=7 HSW=152 HBP=113 kHz=42 VFP=6 VSW=11 VBP=13 Hz=50


Linux modeline parameters:

"1440x810" 71.902 1440 1447 1599 1712 810 816 827 840 +hsync +vsync

----------------------------------------------------------------------

NTSC settings -- 1440 x 816 x 47.952hz

----------------------------------------------------------------------

PowerStrip timing parameters:

1440x816=1440,40,152,96,816,2,4,14,69272,1


Generic timing details for 1440x816:

HFP=40 HSW=152 HBP=96 kHz=40 VFP=2 VSW=4 VBP=14 Hz=48


Linux modeline parameters:

"1440x816" 69.272 1440 1480 1632 1728 816 818 822 836 +hsync +vsync

----------------------------------------------------------------------


Cheers :)


Russ
See less See more
A nice helpfull post Russ. I've been using my XG on an 80" screen approximately 95" away for the last 3 years at 1280X720 and it has always given me a pretty good image. However I don't think I'd go much bigger as it compromises light output. That it the ONLY drawback of the CRT and really has me thinking about converging a second projector onto the same screen for more light output (and maybe to go a little bigger!)
yonexsp! How did it go? I'm really hoping that you got away with a larger screen as I want to do the same. Let me know.
Hi,


Well, I have my 16:9 96x54 inch screen, and ended up moving the projector closer & restarting from scratch. I would like a bigger screen, but am using a Home-Made screen from Black-out cloth. It only comes in 55" width, so stcuk for now with the 54" width. When I can be bothered, sson I hope, I will get some bigger material and make a 120" screen. BUT I really like the 110" at the moment, plenty big & plenty bright.


I had some issues with my PJ, but after an EPROM reset & restaging the projector, everythying is sweeet now. I am using the 720p settings, and intend to try the 1440p settings this coming weekend. I'll fill you inon how it goes.


Br Ken./
1 - 18 of 18 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top