Joined
·
45 Posts
I was going to put this in the DIY section since it would interest them more, but this forum says "should cover theory" so I guess it should go here.
Has anyone seen, heard of, or tried this?
http://www.google.com.ar/patents/US20120219171
It says you can tune a port higher to get lower extension, which would also make for a much smaller "enclosure".
"Prior art teaches that low frequency extension is achieved by tuning low, near the desired low frequency cut off. It is counter intuitive in prior art that low frequency extension could be achieved by tuning higher, above the operating band of the loudspeaker assembly.
Tuning higher to provide low frequency extension would have an advantage that the loudspeaker assembly may be very small. The loudspeaker may be made as small as desired to satisfy practical requirements including cost and space availability. In some applications it may be appropriate to make the loudspeaker assembly even smaller to achieve a desired response."
I would like to hear thoughts from the vastly more experienced than I on this subject.
It certainly seems interesting to have increasingly smaller enclosures for increasingly larger drivers for increased WAF.
Has anyone seen, heard of, or tried this?
http://www.google.com.ar/patents/US20120219171
It says you can tune a port higher to get lower extension, which would also make for a much smaller "enclosure".
"Prior art teaches that low frequency extension is achieved by tuning low, near the desired low frequency cut off. It is counter intuitive in prior art that low frequency extension could be achieved by tuning higher, above the operating band of the loudspeaker assembly.
Tuning higher to provide low frequency extension would have an advantage that the loudspeaker assembly may be very small. The loudspeaker may be made as small as desired to satisfy practical requirements including cost and space availability. In some applications it may be appropriate to make the loudspeaker assembly even smaller to achieve a desired response."
I would like to hear thoughts from the vastly more experienced than I on this subject.
It certainly seems interesting to have increasingly smaller enclosures for increasingly larger drivers for increased WAF.