AVS Forum banner

12881 - 12900 of 24052 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,280 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by yet2b /forum/post/0


XBR1 SXRD's scale to and display _everything_ in their native 1080p resolution. They can't do anything else. I can see how you might have thought this would also mean the XBR1 would accept a 1080p signal. But, consider that there simply were no 1080p broadcasts (still aren't), and that it is easier to design electronics to process 1080i. Given these factors, Sony did the smart thing in not trying to make give the SXRB1 1080p input capability. In fact, probably the only reason the A2000 inputs 1080p is that Sony is trying to tie it to the BluRay DVD. At this point, the benefits of inputting 1080p are non-existent for everything except computer monitor use.


Something I would like to see is a better way of dealing with judder. I find 2/3 judder on an HD TV very annoying. If the 2.5 DRC of the XBR2 provides any improvements in this area, that would be why I would want it, not because it can accept 1080p signals.


In your case, after attempts to fix the problem, you still have the green blob. You probably should push for an exchange with the A2000 or XBR2 on that basis.

You won't eliminate the judder until you have 1080P/24 input (which XBR2 won't do) and the set showing it in some multiple of 24 (i.e., 72, 96, or 120).
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
871 Posts
I have received permission to post the contact information for the lawyer handling the class action lawsuit against Sony over the Green Blob:


Robert I. Lax, Esq.

Robert I. Lax & Associates

535 Fifth Avenue

21st Floor

New York, New York 10017

Tel: (212) 818-9150

Fax: (212) 818-1266

rlax (at) lax-law (dot) com [spam blinded]


He is especially interested in learning the names of Sony personnel who make material statements about the Green Blob, such as what causes it, that it's been fixed, or that parts have been redesigned due to the Green Blob. Also of interest would be the names of any Customer Service reps who have visited owners with the Green Blob.


Also, I now have .pdf copy of the complaint.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
34 Posts
Well, I guess I'm kinda screwed here. Just bught the 60" XBR 3 days ago from a local HT place ...pic is incredible ...but it's got a Sept '05 build date.


It would seem from what I've read that the GB (green blob) appearing soon is a forgone conclusion.


Since the store owner is a friend, I guess I'll make him aware of what's going on w/these sets and hope that Sony comes to the rescue and eventually does the right thing here. I would hope they'll replace w/an XBR2 when they come out....


I should've come here before I bought the #[email protected]! thing!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,280 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by rickmeoff /forum/post/0


Well, I guess I'm kinda screwed here. Just bught the 60" XBR 3 days ago from a local HT place ...pic is incredible ...but it's got a Sept '05 build date.


It would seem from what I've read that the GB (green blob) appearing soon is a forgone conclusion.


Since the owner is a friend, I guess I'll make him aware of what's going on w/these sets and hope that Sony comes to the rescue and eventually does the right thing here. I would hope they'll replace w/an XBR2 when they come out....


I should've come here before I bought the #[email protected]! thing!

I have 4,500+ hours on the lamp on my Sept '05 built 60". Never had a green blob issue. Set is perfect.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
871 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by rickmeoff /forum/post/0


Well, I guess I'm kinda screwed here. Just bught the 60" XBR 3 days ago from a local HT place ...pic is incredible ...but it's got a Sept '05 build date.


It would seem from what I've read that the GB (green blob) appearing soon is a forgone conclusion.


Since the store owner is a friend, I guess I'll make him aware of what's going on w/these sets and hope that Sony comes to the rescue and eventually does the right thing here. I would hope they'll replace w/an XBR2 when they come out....


I should've come here before I bought the #[email protected]! thing!

Some with Sep 05 buld sets have yet to see any problems.


You won't have any recourse through Sony unless and until you actually have a problem (which may never show up.)


However, people need to know about this--and that includes retailers. They're often the ones who get left holding the bag.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,280 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by sourcery /forum/post/0


I have received permission to post the contact information for the lawyer handling the class action lawsuit against Sony over the Green Blob:


Robert I. Lax, Esq.

Robert I. Lax & Associates

535 Fifth Avenue

21st Floor

New York, New York 10017

Tel: (212) 818-9150

Fax: (212) 818-1266

rlax (at) lax-law (dot) com [spam blinded]


He is especially interested in learning the names of Sony personnel who make material statements about the Green Blob, such as what causes it, that it's been fixed, or that parts have been redesigned due to the Green Blob. Also of interest would be the names of any Customer Service reps who have visited owners with the Green Blob.


Also, I now have .pdf copy of the complaint.

If he wins a settlement it will probably be something like $3 million for him and $3.25 for all owners of the set.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
17 Posts
i have a question for my friend


He has 60XBR1 SXRD hooked up to the dvd player that comes with the Sony Dream System through HDMI



he says when he hooks it up, the tv doesn't even show it as being connected


any idea what could be wrong?


Hdmi cable was from monoprice. thanks
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
141 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by rickmeoff /forum/post/0


Well, I guess I'm kinda screwed here. Just bught the 60" XBR 3 days ago from a local HT place ...pic is incredible ...but it's got a Sept '05 build date.


It would seem from what I've read that the GB (green blob) appearing soon is a forgone conclusion.


Since the owner is a friend, I guess I'll make him aware of what's going on w/these sets and hope that Sony comes to the rescue and eventually does the right thing here. I would hope they'll replace w/an XBR2 when they come out....


I should've come here before I bought the #[email protected]! thing!

Don't be so quick to work yourself into an AVS-induced nervous breakdown. I won't argue the fact that there are a lot of sets out there with problems, but these blob accusations have taken on a life of their own. I believe that they are WAY, WAY overblownat least as far as what an innocent reader of this forum would be inclined to conclude.


I eagerly awaited the XBR1 a couple months prior to its release. Then I read about it and viewed it for several months before purchasing. When I finally bought one in February, I pulled my hair out worrying that the ugly green stain (which disappeared completely within a minute of warm-up) would get worse. Just like now, word around here back then would lead you to believe that it was a "foregone conclusion."


So I exchanged it...only to discover that new one was exactly the same (i.e. perfect after a minute or so. Five months later, nothing has changed. I'll keep looking for it, but I bought it from a good dealer with a 4 year 100% parts and labor (including bulbs) warranty, so I'm not terribly worried.


Like I said, I won't argue the fact that there are a lot of sets out there with problems. But I know what the blob looks like in that minute of warm up, and I can honestly say that I've never seen one on an XBR1 display model. Admittedly, I'm not scrutinizing the way I was several months ago, and I'm not flipping to memory stick or asking the sales guys to thrown on a b&w movie. But I've been doing a lot of shopping for audio equipment over the last several months (and I'm still trying to decide on a stand), and I almost always take a glance at the XBR1s. I feel sick admitting it, but taking into account all the stores/locations/models I've viewed, I've probably seen 30-50 different XBR1s.


This is little solace to those of you with serious problems, and I don't doubt that there are many in that boat. But let's stop assuming all of them are this way because they aren't. If anything, based on what I've read, I'd be a little nervous about your set being an September '05 build. Not only do the older ones seem more susceptible to some of the problems, but it's August of 2006 for goodness sake! How is it that your friend still has such ancient stock? My replacement set was delivered on March 10th, and I still got a March build.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,280 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by mithong /forum/post/0


i have a question for my friend


He has 60XBR1 SXRD hooked up to the dvd player that comes with the Sony Dream System through HDMI



he says when he hooks it up, the tv doesn't even show it as being connected


any idea what could be wrong?


Hdmi cable was from monoprice. thanks

Has he switched the TV to the proper input? If the answer is yes, suggest he connect another component to the same HDMI input, if that works the problem is the dvd player.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
622 Posts
I googled Robert Lax. He has been involved in a number of consumer suits including Sony CD issues and Something to do with a Pioneer DVD player.


Roy
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
189 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by datbeme /forum/post/0


.......


Like I said, I won't argue the fact that there are a lot of sets out there with problems. But I know what the blob looks like in that minute of warm up, and I can honestly say that I've never seen one on an XBR1 display model. Admittedly, I'm not scrutinizing the way I was several months ago, and I'm not flipping to memory stick or asking the sales guys to thrown on a b&w movie. But I've been doing a lot of shopping for audio equipment over the last several months (and I'm still trying to decide on a stand), and I almost always take a glance at the XBR1s. I feel sick admitting it, but taking into account all the stores/locations/models I've viewed, I've probably seen 30-50 different XBR1s.


This is little solace to those of you with serious problems, and I don't doubt that there are many in that boat. But let's stop assuming all of them are this way because they aren't. If anything, based on what I've read, I'd be a little nervous about your set being an September '05 build. Not only do the older ones seem more susceptible to some of the problems, but it's August of 2006 for goodness sake! How is it that your friend still has such ancient stock? My replacement set was delivered on March 10th, and I still got a March build.

I like my April '06 build 50" XBR1, and do not have the blob problem, knock on wood. But, I have seen enough display sets with the problem to know it exists and is widespread. Just today, I stopped by CompUSA and Circuit City (Emeryville, CA). The display XBR1 in CompUSA (still at pre-A2000 price, surprisingly) had the green blob in the upper right corner of the screen. You didn't have to turn on the memory stick screen to see it; it jumped out at you. At Circuit City, they have finally removed the 50" XBR1 that was there for a couple months with a very bad blob problem (could not understand why they left it on display, unless they wanted to discourage buyers). But, the 60" XBR1 whose display station is now occupied by the A2000 has been moved to a display row along the wall at an "open box" price; and, on some scenes, I am reasonably sure it now has a faint green blob in the upper right corner. It wasn't nearly as noticeable as the blob on the one at CompUSA, and I didn't switch to the memory stick screen. I'd say about 40% of the display sets I've seen in stores have had the blob problem to some degree, which would make it a significant problem.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
871 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by rlb /forum/post/0


If he wins a settlement it will probably be something like $3 million for him and $3.25 for all owners of the set.

The suit asks the court to order Sony to repay to each consumer who purchased a KDS-RxxXBR1 the full price of the set, plus interest. The suit alleges that every single KDS-RxxXBR1 sold has the defect, even if it has not yet become evident. It makes the same allegation concerning the replacement optical blocks and ASU/DSU boards.

The court is also asked to issue an injunction prohibiting Sony from selling the product.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,367 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by sourcery /forum/post/0


The suit asks the court to order Sony to repay to each consumer who purchased a KDS-RxxXBR1 the full price of the set, plus interest. The suit alleges that every single KDS-RxxXBR1 sold has the defect, even if it has not yet become evident. It makes the same allegation concerning the replacement optical blocks and ASU/DSU boards.

The court is also asked to issue an injunction prohibiting Sony from selling the product.

Good Luck!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,280 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by sourcery /forum/post/0


The suit asks the court to order Sony to repay to each consumer who purchased a KDS-RxxXBR1 the full price of the set, plus interest. The suit alleges that every single KDS-RxxXBR1 sold has the defect, even if it has not yet become evident. It makes the same allegation concerning the replacement optical blocks and ASU/DSU boards.

The court is also asked to issue an injunction prohibiting Sony from selling the product.

Sounds like a perfect example of "frivolous lawsuit". We won't see a "nickle"; and I was already trying to figure out where I would spend my $3.25. What a disappointment!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
684 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by sourcery /forum/post/0


The suit asks the court to order Sony to repay to each consumer who purchased a KDS-RxxXBR1 the full price of the set, plus interest. The suit alleges that every single KDS-RxxXBR1 sold has the defect, even if it has not yet become evident. It makes the same allegation concerning the replacement optical blocks and ASU/DSU boards.

The court is also asked to issue an injunction prohibiting Sony from selling the product.

With these class action suits do the lawyers typically "shoot for the moon" from the get-go while fully expecting to settle for less?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
871 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by rlb /forum/post/0


Sounds like a perfect example of "frivolous lawsuit". We won't see a "nickle"; and I was already trying to figure out where I would spend my $3.25. What a disappointment!

Well, I'm not a lawyer. But the complaint cites numerous State and Federal laws in favor of the pleadings, although I didn't noitice any case law citations. Typically, it's the interpretive precedents formed by previous decisions that govern what the laws actually mean, as far as the courts are concerned. There must be a heavy thicket of such precedents.


Obviously, the heart of the case will be the evidence that can be produced in support of the claimed facts. That will determine whether the jury will find Sony guilty of violating any of the laws cited in the complaint (based on preponderance of the evidence, by the way--this is a civil case.)


Assuming Sony is found guilty, the real fun will be the battle over the appropriate remedies for Sony having violated the law (for each such law.) Again, the existing case law will be a key factor.


Of course, Sony is likely to appeal any adverse judgement. I strongly suspect this will be where the case ends up, and where the final decisions will be made as to who gets what when.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
871 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by AtlPaul /forum/post/0


With these class action suits do the lawyers typically "shoot for the moon" from the get-go while fully expecting to settle for less?

If they're smart, they ask for whatever the underlying laws and/or applicable case law allow, based on the assumption that all the facts cited in the complaint are true, and that all the cited laws and precedents mean what the lawyers think they mean (and intend to so argue.)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,280 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by sourcery /forum/post/0


If they're smart, they ask for whatever the underlying laws and/or applicable case law allow, based on the assumption that all the facts cited in the complaint are true, and that all the cited laws and precedents mean what the lawyers think they mean (and intend to so argue.)

What facts were cited in the complaint? What "underlying laws" were violated? This appears to be B.S. Where's the beef?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
871 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by rlb /forum/post/0


What facts were cited in the complaint? What "underlying laws" were violated? This appears to be B.S. Where's the beef?

The key facts alleged by the complaint are summed up in the Preliminary Statement, thusly:

Quote:
Plaintiff alleges that the Televisions possess a characteristic and inherent defect (the “Defect”). The Defect causes green blobs, green haze, yellow lines, and other color anomalies to be displayed across the screens of the Televisions, severely interfering with the program display, and rendering the Televisions unsuitable for their principal purpose. 4. As such, Sony has perpetuated a massive consumer fraud upon no fewer than tens of thousands of unsuspecting consumers. Sony marketed these Televisions as high-end videophile devices, with a high definition picture far superior to that provided by a standard television, and these claims allowed Sony to command suggested retail prices for these units of approximately $5,000.00, or more. In fact however, the Defect contained in the Televisions, and the green blob, green haze, yellow lines, and other color anomalies that it causes to appear across the screens, render them essentially useless.

The complaint goes into greater detail about Sony's alleged actions, and makes other material allegations concerning the Defect in the televisions.


I think the most important quote in that regard is the following:

Quote:
14. To date, despite persistent consumer demands, Sony has been unable or unwilling to develop or offer to consumers any permanent fix for the Defect. Instead, Sony has offered only to replace the optical blocks with identical units containing – but not yet manifesting -- the Defect, but has done nothing to correct the underlying cause of the Defect. As a result, although the new optical blocks serve as a temporary “band-aid” solution, the underlying Defect remains, and will cause the green blobs, green haze, and yellow lines to reappear anywhere from several weeks to several months after installation, depending upon usage.

The lawyers would not make such claims, unless they were confident they could prove them at trial. Of course, in the end the jury will decide what it thinks the facts are, weighing all the evidence, including that presented by Sony.


As for the law, the complaint cites the following causes of action:

Quote:
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

Unlawful, Unfair and Fraudulent Business Acts and Practices in Violation of Bus. & Prof. Code §17200, et seq.
Quote:
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION

Untrue and Misleading Advertising in Violation of Bus. & Prof. Code §17500, et seq.

Quote:
THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION

Unlawful Practice in Sale of Consumer Goods in Violation of CA Consumers Legal Remedies Act, Civil Code §1750, et. seq. [California State Law is involved because Sony Electronics, Inc. is a Delaware corporation, with its principal offices in San Diego, California. This section also accuses Sony of having violated California Civil Code §1770 in various ways]

The fourth cause of action lists numerous State laws of numerous States that Sony is alleged to have violated.

Quote:
FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION

Violation of the Song Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (Cal Civ. Code §1792 et seq.)

Quote:
SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION

Violation of Magnuson-Moss Act (15 U.S.C. §2301 et seq.)
Quote:
SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION

Breach of Express Warranty (Given the absense of any citations of any statutes here, I assume this claim is based on common law):


98. Sony’s affirmations of fact and/or promises relating to the Televisions created express warranties that the products purchased by plaintiff and the Class would operate properly and without defects, and would therefore portray video without extraneous artifacts which would impair the viewing of the video program.

99. Alternatively, Sony’s descriptions of the Televisions became part of the bases of the bargains between consumers and Sony, creating express warranties that the product purchased by plaintiff and the Class would conform to Sony’s representations.

100. In fact, the products purchased by plaintiff did not so conform.

101. As a result of the foregoing, plaintiff and the Class have suffered damages.
Quote:
EIGHTH CAUSE OF ACTION

Breach of Implied Warranty (same comment as above)


103. Sony’s affirmations of fact and/or promises relating to the Televisions created implied warranties that the products purchased by plaintiff and the Class would operate properly and without defects, and would therefore portray video without extraneous artifacts that would impair the viewing of the video program.

104. Alternatively, Sony’s descriptions of the Televisions became part of the bases of the bargains between consumers and Sony, creating implied warranties that the product purchased by plaintiff and the Class would conform to Sony’s representations.

105. In fact, the products purchased by plaintiff and the Class did not so conform.

106. As a result of the foregoing, plaintiff and the Class have suffered damages.



If you want more "beef" than that, read the Complaint, and or talk to the lawyer.
 
12881 - 12900 of 24052 Posts
Top