AVS Forum banner

41 - 60 of 1291 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
15,079 Posts
It's not hot enough to burn, but, hotter than what I have felt with most all of my prior AV equipment. It definitely needs more ventilation as right now there is only about 2 inches of clearance on top. I was going to move it to a different area but I needed to buy some longer cables to connect to my amp. I guess I need to do that asap, at this point. For now, I'm going to make sure I use an external fan until I finalize a more permanent solution.
Many AVS users like to use one of AC Infinity's Aircom fan models.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
91,867 Posts
Discussion Starter · #42 ·
It's not hot enough to burn, but, hotter than what I have felt with most all of my prior AV equipment. It definitely needs more ventilation as right now there is only about 2 inches of clearance on top. I was going to move it to a different area but I needed to buy some longer cables to connect to my amp. I guess I need to do that asap, at this point. For now, I'm going to make sure I use an external fan until I finalize a more permanent solution.
Adding an AC Infinity Aircom T8 (rear exhaust) only adds 1" to the top of the AVP so would work quite well in your setup.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11,929 Posts
Just bought a AV7705 today. First time Marantz owner.


In 2001 I was using Yamaha AVR's HT/RX line, then in 2005 a Rotel RSP, then a Emotiva UMC in 2008, then an XSP-1 and Oppo 105 in 2013, and I've been using that until 2018, when I went Motu/Marantz just recently...

Will let you know what I think of it's SQ when it gets here.
Probably will take a week or whatnot to ship out/get here.

I need two HDMI outputs with 4K/60 preferably with color management, or at least ByPass.
Main HDMI input will be a Sony X700 which has HDR 12-Bit Dolby Vision support.
Fiber TV and XBOX for the remaining inputs.

I have no need for eARC or Streaming, or voice commands or multi-room/zones.
IMAX and Web UI's, as well as any Phone Apps would be "cool" but I don't require those features per-se.
I think for the most part I'll just be using the supplied remote.

HDMI to 7.1.4 XLR is all I truly care about, in purest mode. The rest is just value-add.

I will only be using the 7705 for movie-mode and only for direct digital decoding to 7.1.4 XLR. No Audyssey for me.
My Motu's handle all DSP and does bit-perfect in music-mode with the Sabre DAC, -180db SNR SW and -132db SNR HW etc.

Motu's handle the multi-channel multi-way actives and active subwoofer arrays (tri-channel bass). A poor-mans Trinnov 48 basically. :p

The Marantz and X700 replaces my XSP-1, Oppo 105 and Cleanboxes.
The Cleanboxes are without question the weakest link.
Should be a fairly large upgrade I'd imagine... 4K, Atmos, direct XLR, and all that good stuff! Can't wait...

I'm at work until Christmas/New Years, but I'll at least be able to test all the XLR outputs via my balanced HD800 headphones directly, until I can take the Marantz and X700 home with me and give it a full proper test.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
29 Posts
Hey everyone,
I am a previous marantz at 5008 owner and burned something out in it while testing a few diffetent amps. After lots of replacement research I went for a nad t758 v3 mainly because of dirac but after a long stressful learning curve, multiplied by terrible conflicting nad instructions, bugs, and support, I have decided to come back to a marantz. I eventually got the nad with dirac to soung good and very clean and neutral, but it was just missing something. Just didnt sound as dynamic anf didn't have that movie theater feel and weight I was used to with marantz and audyssey. This time I will be going with the AV7705. I have 2 main questions. Based on the info prom the original post comparing the 7705 and 8805. The 8805 has a dialogue enhancer option with audyssey that I thought came with all versions of audyssey but based on the post it seems it only comes with the 8805. Can anyone confirm this? Dialogue was my only issue with audyssey before and something dirac did very well. I would also be interested in hearing feedback on that feature and whether it works well or not. I would hate if its only available on the 8805 because it would be a huge premium to pay for 1 feature . although I'm sure the better build, copper bottom plate, better dacs and the torroidal transformer definitely make it worth the upgrade, the dialogue enhancer is strictly a software based feature that has nothing to do with build in order for it to be available in the other models. My second question has been asked by another member but really answered. Going from a comparable receiver to a processor, is there any noticeable sonic improvement if the same external amp is used? Lets say an SR 7013 compared to an av7705? I understand they use the same dacs and use XT32 to calibrate. If I am not going to be using the balanced XLRs at this moment, I should technically get the same voltage and and sonic quality out of the unbalanced pre-outs from both units but have have yet to hear whether this hold up in the real world. Has anyone had any experience in upgrading from a similar receiver to av processor while keeping the same amp? Thanks in advance!
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,216 Posts
Hey everyone,
I am a previous marantz at 5008 owner and burned something out in it while testing a few diffetent amps. After lots of replacement research I went for a nad t758 v3 mainly because of dirac but after a long stressful learning curve, multiplied by terrible conflicting nad instructions, bugs, and support, I have decided to come back to a marantz. I eventually got the nad with dirac to soung good and very clean and neutral, but it was just missing something. Just didnt sound as dynamic anf didn't have that movie theater feel and weight I was used to with marantz and audyssey. This time I will be going with the AV7705. I have 2 main questions. Based on the info prom the original post comparing the 7705 and 8805. The 8805 has a dialogue enhancer option with audyssey that I thought came with all versions of audyssey but based on the post it seems it only comes with the 8805. Can anyone confirm this? Dialogue was my only issue with audyssey before and something dirac did very well. I would also be interested in hearing feedback on that feature and whether it works well or not. I would hate if its only available on the 8805 because it would be a huge premium to pay for 1 feature . although I'm sure the better build, copper bottom plate, better dacs and the torroidal transformer definitely make it worth the upgrade, the dialogue enhancer is strictly a software based feature that has nothing to do with build in order for it to be available in the other models. My second question has been asked by another member but really answered. Going from a comparable receiver to a processor, is there any noticeable sonic improvement if the same external amp is used? Lets say an SR 7013 compared to an av7705? I understand they use the same dacs and use XT32 to calibrate. If I am not going to be using the balanced XLRs at this moment, I should technically get the same voltage and and sonic quality out of the unbalanced pre-outs from both units but have have yet to hear whether this hold up in the real world. Has anyone had any experience in upgrading from a similar receiver to av processor while keeping the same amp? Thanks in advance!
The AV7705 has a center channel adjust option, but I do not think it is the same as the dialogue enhancer option you are referencing. It simply bumps up the level of the center channel. I have always had a problem with Audyssey and center channel dialogue. However, with the AV7705 I have no issues with the center channel dialogue. This processor has a very clean, detailed sound. I have always liked the clarity and resolution of Onkyo receivers especially with dialogue and in my opinion this processor is surprisingly close to the Onkyo detail and resolution, yet maintains the Marantz warmth it is known for. Maybe it just meshes we’ll with my amp and speakers (Emotiva 7 Gen 3 and Focal 1038 BE II’s). I don’t know the answer, but I am thoroughly enjoying it.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
91,867 Posts
Discussion Starter · #46 ·
Hey everyone,
I am a previous marantz at 5008 owner and burned something out in it while testing a few diffetent amps. After lots of replacement research I went for a nad t758 v3 mainly because of dirac but after a long stressful learning curve, multiplied by terrible conflicting nad instructions, bugs, and support, I have decided to come back to a marantz. I eventually got the nad with dirac to soung good and very clean and neutral, but it was just missing something. Just didnt sound as dynamic anf didn't have that movie theater feel and weight I was used to with marantz and audyssey. This time I will be going with the AV7705. I have 2 main questions. Based on the info prom the original post comparing the 7705 and 8805. The 8805 has a dialogue enhancer option with audyssey that I thought came with all versions of audyssey but based on the post it seems it only comes with the 8805. Can anyone confirm this? Dialogue was my only issue with audyssey before and something dirac did very well. I would also be interested in hearing feedback on that feature and whether it works well or not. I would hate if its only available on the 8805 because it would be a huge premium to pay for 1 feature . although I'm sure the better build, copper bottom plate, better dacs and the torroidal transformer definitely make it worth the upgrade, the dialogue enhancer is strictly a software based feature that has nothing to do with build in order for it to be available in the other models. My second question has been asked by another member but really answered. Going from a comparable receiver to a processor, is there any noticeable sonic improvement if the same external amp is used? Lets say an SR 7013 compared to an av7705? I understand they use the same dacs and use XT32 to calibrate. If I am not going to be using the balanced XLRs at this moment, I should technically get the same voltage and and sonic quality out of the unbalanced pre-outs from both units but have have yet to hear whether this hold up in the real world. Has anyone had any experience in upgrading from a similar receiver to av processor while keeping the same amp? Thanks in advance!
You can actually confirm for yourself by simply downloading each of the AV7705 and AV8805 Owner's manuals. ;)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
29 Posts
The AV7705 has a center channel adjust option, but I do not think it is the same as the dialogue enhancer option you are referencing. It simply bumps up the level of the center channel. I have always had a problem with Audyssey and center channel dialogue. However, with the AV7705 I have no issues with the center channel dialogue. This processor has a very clean, detailed sound. I have always liked the clarity and resolution of Onkyo receivers especially with dialogue and in my opinion this processor is surprisingly close to the Onkyo detail and resolution, yet maintains the Marantz warmth it is known for. Maybe it just meshes we’ll with my amp and speakers (Emotiva 7 Gen 3 and Focal 1038 BE II’s). I don’t know the answer, but I am thoroughly enjoying it.
Thanks for the feedback! Very encouraging!. I will using tannoy revolution XT8F towers and a klipsch center. No surrpunds for now because i would need some in ceiling and im currently renting. I currently have a 2 channel prima luna tube amp for LR but I will most likely be getting a monolith 5 channel amp as I've heard it before with my previous marantz receiver and sound was amazing! I expect to receive the 7705 in about a week so I will keep you guys posted on the results.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
29 Posts
You can actually confirm for yourself by simply downloading each of the AV7705 and AV8805 Owner's manuals. ;)
I looked them both up and it only appears in the manual for the 8805. It sounds like it may be a heos only feature but its hard to know for sure based on how it is written. If anyone has anyone experience with the dialog enhancer feature I'd love to hear it!
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
91,867 Posts
Discussion Starter · #49 · (Edited)
I looked them both up and it only appears in the manual for the 8805. It sounds like it may be a heos only feature but its hard to know for sure based on how it is written. If anyone has anyone experience with the dialog enhancer feature I'd love to hear it!
Right. Because the AV8805 is the only current Marantz AVR/AVP that features this setting. The is only on the "flagship" Denon/Marantz models and doesn't just apply to HEOS, the "HEOS Music" note in the manual simply indicates what should be done "when" the source is HEOS music, as it applies to both movies and music. To better understand what it is doing, refer to the post in the former "flagship" 4520CI (first model in which it was introduced) thread:

https://www.avsforum.com/forum/90-r...ial-denon-avr-4520ci-thread.html#post22413907
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
998 Posts
Right. Because the AV8805 is the only current Marantz AVR/AVP that features this setting. The is only on the "flagship" Denon/Marantz models and doesn't just apply to HEOS, the "HEOS Music" note in the manual simply indicates what should be done "when" the source is HEOS music, as it applies to both movies and music. To better understand what it is doing, refer to the post in the former "flagship" 4520CI (first model in which it was introduced) thread:

https://www.avsforum.com/forum/90-r...ial-denon-avr-4520ci-thread.html#post22413907
from looking at the measurements in that post, it seems like it is basically just removing MRC for the center channel. With the new app you can turn that off.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
91,867 Posts
Discussion Starter · #51 ·
from looking at the measurements in that post, it seems like it is basically just removing MRC for the center channel. With the new app you can turn that off.
MRC compensation refers to a "dip" in the 2kHz region which when disable would simply leave a flat curve. The increases the 1kHz-3kHz range using 3 different settings as noted in the linked post.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
998 Posts
MRC compensation refers to a "dip" in the 2kHz region which when disable would simply leave a flat curve. The increases the 1kHz-3kHz range using 3 different settings as noted in the linked post.
yep. I know what MRC does. What I was trying to get across is if you use the reference curve with MRC on, you are essentially just boosting out some of the dip it created with Dialog Enhancer. Mike was saying he thought Dirac had better vocal clarity and was asking about Dialog Enhancer. Dirac doesn't have the midrange compensation. If he turns that off, he might find the dialog more clear with Audyssey.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,226 Posts
Has anyone tried this one with active or optical HDMI cables to their TV? Is it the same board as the 8805? It seems from that thread that the 8805 may not have enough output voltage on the HDMI outputs for long active cables.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
29 Posts
yep. I know what MRC does. What I was trying to get across is if you use the reference curve with MRC on, you are essentially just boosting out some of the dip it created with Dialog Enhancer. Mike was saying he thought Dirac had better vocal clarity and was asking about Dialog Enhancer. Dirac doesn't have the midrange compensation. If he turns that off, he might find the dialog more clear with Audyssey.
Thanks jdsmoothie for the great information, exactly what I was looking for! Tbaucom thanks for further insight on this! I can see how going with flat curve in that region should technically match the dirac result but is this something I can manually edit with the audyssey editor app? Would I be able to flatten that region or even essentially duplicate the dialog enhancer manually? I'm very underinformed in the app and am not sure how much control and customization the app allows.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,643 Posts
Thanks jdsmoothie for the great information, exactly what I was looking for! Tbaucom thanks for further insight on this! I can see how going with flat curve in that region should technically match the dirac result but is this something I can manually edit with the audyssey editor app? Would I be able to flatten that region or even essentially duplicate the dialog enhancer manually? I'm very underinformed in the app and am not sure how much control and customization the app allows.


There is a lot of information available on the Audyssey MultEQ editor on this forum. Why not take the time, and make the effort to learn for yourself?

https://www.avsforum.com/forum/90-r...rantz-av-receivers-pre-pros.html#post52030545


The following is a very valuable software tool developed by a member (valuable expertise and time devoted for free, quite amazing!) that can be used to enhance the value of MultEQ.

https://www.avsforum.com/forum/90-r...g-audyssey-multeq-app-files.html#post56912816
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,505 Posts
unit arrived - just fired it up to see if working and install latest firmware - still be awhile get new upgrades up and running - just wanted to post the interface is really nice - just installed some Atmos Speakers - the walk through of system configuration was well done-
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11,929 Posts
Looks like mine might be shipping out today.
Can't wait to get this thing in my hands...

I've never played a UHD disc before, nor have I heard Atmos before. (I needed this beast to enable that.)

I guess now I need a 4K projector and Atmos speakers to go with this beast too...
I'm fine with this hobby never ending like this, as long as it keeps getting better along the way. ;)
These first worlder problems I tell ya! :)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,643 Posts
Has anyone tried this one with active or optical HDMI cables to their TV? Is it the same board as the 8805? It seems from that thread that the 8805 may not have enough output voltage on the HDMI outputs for long active cables.
Why does do you believe the board makes a difference? The digital board in these units supports all sorts of functions; audio and video.

At least the upper level Denon/Marantz/Yamaha AVR's and AVP's all use the same Panasonic IC to support their HDMI outputs. All these IC's run off tightly regulated power supplies. Typically the outputs of the IC are only an inch or two from the output jacks. Because of these similarities, if the output in one product works, they all should work from a voltage level standpoint.

The output of the AVP only has to drive the input of the active cable. The electronics in the active cable are designed drive the long cable without issues.

Output voltage is often down the list of worries at the high operating frequencies of the HDMI electronics and cables.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,226 Posts
Why does do you believe the board makes a difference?


Because people on the 8805 thread have reported issues with optical cables and the speculation there is that the 8805 does not provide enough juice to drive their electronics.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,643 Posts
Has anyone tried this one with active or optical HDMI cables to their TV? Is it the same board as the 8805? It seems from that thread that the 8805 may not have enough output voltage on the HDMI outputs for long active cables.
Why does do you believe the board makes a difference? The digital board in these units supports all sorts of functions; audio and video.

At least the upper level Denon/Marantz/Yamaha AVR's and AVP's all use the same Panasonic IC to support their HDMI outputs. All these IC's run off tightly regulated power supplies. Typically the outputs of the IC are only an inch or two from the output jacks. Because of these similarities, if the output in one product works, they all should work from a voltage level standpoint.

The output of the AVP only has to drive the input of the active cable. The electronics in the active cable are designed drive the long cable without issues.

Output voltage is often down the list of worries at the high operating frequencies of the HDMI electronics and cables.
Because people on the 8805 thread have reported issues with optical cables and the speculation there is that the 8805 does not provide enough juice to drive their electronics.

Have you read the explanation above? It serves no good purpose to put uncertainty into readers minds with speculation concerning problems, and mentions of "juice," whatever that is.

One observation that can be made from reading posts on this forum over many years is that HDMI cables are the root of a huge number of problems. Very often problems are fixed by a member replacing an existing cable with a new cable. The new cable may have a higher rating, such as Premium, or at times its a similar cable. The old one may have suffered unnoticed damage, or had its characteristics changes by being bent hanging down off the back of a piece of equipment. The whole HDMI system operates at very high frequencies where maintaining fine geometries and the integrity of shields is very important. The mortality rate of cables, and the requirement for ever higher construction standards for HDMI cables, reflect this fact. Active HDMI cables, that may have questionable HDMI certifications, only add to the complexities and number of failure modes.

Fortunately the trial of a new HDMI cable is easy and inexpensive. The person with the problem moves on since the problem is fixed. Imagine what would happen if cables cost a lot more or had a long lead time for delivery. There would be all sorts of "speculation" about bad electronics or "juice" (save us from discussions of fluid mechanics) and who knows what else. It would be time to sacrifice a sheep at the local volcano to fix the problem.
 
41 - 60 of 1291 Posts
Top