AVS Forum banner

841 - 860 of 882 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,767 Posts
I read over Josh's results and the sub would be good for a small to medium room. This sub got a passing grade at 12.5 Hz. Yes the sub was under stain pushing 140 V. How many HT push that much power. Chase has moved on and so should some of these people . The bottom line on the one GTG is that the subs were not properly setup!!!


And, if anyone was kicked out of AVS it was because of his conduct. The sub, or anything thing else had nothing to do with proper conduct!


Arguing with people who have a bumptious, gail attitude will be filled with skewed information.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,852 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by eljaycanuck  /t/1321030/official-chase-home-theater-owners-thread/800_100#post_24778773


I don't dispute that, but my question remains: Why was Josh testing that sub now?

Because I asked him...nicely.



I still have four of these subs and live about 2 hours from Josh....I wanted to see it tested and added to the data-bass and told Josh to go to town on it. No worries if it blows up as I have moved on from this sub. I struggled for a solid year trying to make this work in my 3000cf theater room and one look at the results shows me I had ZERO chance of making this sub work as a home theater system at reference level. All of the big bass movies killed this sub in my room with my taste in bass.


Also, now we will see if the "new" subwoofer offered by Chane is any better. CHT said over and over they were going to send this sub in for testing and never did...so it is up to Chane to send a sub to Josh to prove that they are offering a "better" sub.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
10,864 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by laugsbach 

Because I asked him...nicely.
That's a good enough reason for me!

Quote:
I struggled for a solid year trying to make this work in my 3000cf theater room and one look at the results shows me I had ZERO chance of making this sub work as a home theater system at reference level.
I keep feeling that I'm missing something with my two SS-18.1s in my ~3,400 cu.ft. room, and now I'm wondering again whether PSA's new XV15se's might be an improvement. Any thoughts on the XV15se's vs. the SS-18.1s?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,852 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by eljaycanuck  /t/1321030/official-chase-home-theater-owners-thread/800_100#post_24780102


I keep feeling that I'm missing something with my two SS-18.1s in my ~3,400 cu.ft. room...

Watching movies?.... yes, you are missing quite a bit if you want to reproduce what is on the disc at realistic levels. BTW, adding two more SS-18.1 subs doesn't help as I tried that!

Quote:
Any thoughts on the XV15se's vs. the SS-18.1s?

I haven't had the opportunity to hear any of the PSA subs....sorry!
 

·
Registered
75" Samsung Q80R QLED, Denon AVR3300, Revel F36, C25, W263, FV15HP x 2, ATV4K, Sony Blu Ray, Harmony
Joined
·
7,836 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by eljaycanuck  /t/1321030/official-chase-home-theater-owners-thread/840#post_24780102



That's a good enough reason for me!


I keep feeling that I'm missing something with my two SS-18.1s in my ~3,400 cu.ft. room, and now I'm wondering again whether PSA's new XV15se's might be an improvement. Any thoughts on the XV15se's vs. the SS-18.1s?
Eljay, I have not heard the SS18.1's, but based on output, it should be a massive upgrade in the low bass department.  The SS18.1's hit 98 dB at 20 Hz.  The new XV15's are around 108 @ 20 based on internal testing.  From what I can see, the XV15se is up an average of over 8 dB from 20-31.5 Hz.  I was also very impressed with their mid and upper bass output for music.  I show the SS18.2 to be up 3 dB 40-63 Hz, but that does not surprise me as the testing indicated very high output in that region from the 18.1  So it looks like down 3 dB up top(do you need that or will you miss it?), but up a ton down low for movies.

 

I played(among quite a few others), the OHF Washington Monument scene, and was VERY impressed with the performance of the xv's, drastically higher LFE effect than I have ever experienced before.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eljaycanuck

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,357 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by laugsbach  /t/1321030/official-chase-home-theater-owners-thread/840#post_24780039

Quote:
Originally Posted by eljaycanuck  /t/1321030/official-chase-home-theater-owners-thread/800_100#post_24778773


I don't dispute that, but my question remains: Why was Josh testing that sub now?

Because I asked him...nicely.



I still have four of these subs and live about 2 hours from Josh....I wanted to see it tested and added to the data-bass and told Josh to go to town on it. No worries if it blows up as I have moved on from this sub. I struggled for a solid year trying to make this work in my 3000cf theater room and one look at the results shows me I had ZERO chance of making this sub work as a home theater system at reference level. All of the big bass movies killed this sub in my room with my taste in bass.


Also, now we will see if the "new" subwoofer offered by Chane is any better. CHT said over and over they were going to send this sub in for testing and never did...so it is up to Chane to send a sub to Josh to prove that they are offering a "better" sub.


We'll see. Jon offered to post any graph of his "new" sub. When he was asked to he took off screaming like a girl. He went from "I got lots of graphs" to a whole lot crap


It will be a while. Look how long it took cc to his get one of his subs done.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
10,864 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by laugsbach 

Watching movies?.... yes, you are missing quite a bit if you want to reproduce what is on the disc at realistic levels. ... I haven't had the opportunity to hear any of the PSA subs....sorry!
No problem, and thanks for your thoughts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bear123 

Eljay, I have not heard the SS18.1's, but based on output, it should be a massive upgrade in the low bass department. ... it looks like down 3 dB up top(do you need that or will you miss it?), but up a ton down low for movies.
That sounds like what I'm missing. I think I need to talk to Tom V. in the near future. Thanks for your thoughts, too.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
14,221 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by eljaycanuck  /t/1321030/official-chase-home-theater-owners-thread/840#post_24780102


That's a good enough reason for me!


I keep feeling that I'm missing something with my two SS-18.1s in my ~3,400 cu.ft. room, and now I'm wondering again whether PSA's new XV15se's might be an improvement. Any thoughts on the XV15se's vs. the SS-18.1s?

the XV15se would have a huge advantage around the tuning point. Probably will be down a few db up top and not extend as deep. I would be willing to bet that you would gain 5-8db in the 16-30hz range over your current setup. That is a ton of headroom



I just watched Pompeii @ -2 MV and my 3 XV15se were amazing. Clean, deep, hard hitting, and not a hint of port noise...of course I did not get to experience the entire disc being the track digs to 1hz, but I am content with solid 15hz on up.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,767 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by eljaycanuck  /t/1321030/official-chase-home-theater-owners-thread/840#post_24780102


That's a good enough reason for me!


I keep feeling that I'm missing something with my two SS-18.1s in my ~3,400 cu.ft. room, and now I'm wondering again whether PSA's new XV15se's might be an improvement. Any thoughts on the XV15se's vs. the SS-18.1s?

Eljay that is a large room and vented subs will serve you better. The PSA vented sub would be an excellent choice. Best of luck Eljay!
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
10,864 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by derrickdj1 

Eljay that is a large room and vented subs will serve you better. The PSA vented sub would be an excellent choice.
Quote:
Originally Posted by basshead81 

the XV15se would have a huge advantage around the tuning point. Probably will be down a few db up top and not extend as deep. I would be willing to bet that you would gain 5-8db in the 16-30hz range over your current setup. That is a ton of headroom
I think I can afford to lose a bit of output higher up, in exchange for more output down to 20Hz and below. My old SVS PB12-NSD used to roll off at ~18Hz and my current subs roll off at ~17Hz, so I don't expect to get any more extension from a pair of XV15se's.


But if I can get more overall output, especially down low - AND retain the "tight" / "musical" qualities of the SS-18.1s (something I like, and something I found lacking in the PB12) - then they do sound like a good way to go.


Thanks for the input, guys.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
808 Posts
I have not read all the posts here (been gone from AVS for a while) but correct me if I am wrong.

The accusation is that part used on CHT subs are Chinese. That is the Cliff's Notes version.

It is driven by he assumption that things made in China tend to be junk.

Yes, there is a large degree of truth there. However, the problem stems more from oversight that geography.

Lets use clothes and furniture as an example. Clothes made in China tend to have an unpleasant rough texture, and fall apart quickly. Furniture made in China usually falls apart ate 1 year of use (which is the warrantee period).

American made clothes are superior as are European. Fabrics made in India and other countries. However, there are a few places in China, where rigourous ovesight of contruction produces bette quality clothes. I have Handcock and Moore HT seats. They are hand made in America and superlative quality. They are expnsive. If you get Italian leather, you will pay more than $5k pr chair.

I paid $3.6k, and the leather was tanned in China. However, H and M oversight rejects all but top quality, so the Chinese leather is butter soft. Chairs are 3 and going strong

Lest apply the argument to subs: CHT may use parts made in China (as do many, many others) but assembly is done here, yes?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15,247 Posts
It's not been my impression that the knock on their subs had anything to do with Chinese sourced sub components.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
808 Posts
It's not been my impression that the knock on their subs had anything to do with Chinese sourced sub components.
I have been gone a while. I remember all the vitriol back when the comparisons were done. Since then (3 years) I have simply been enjoying my system.

6 18 inch subs was a bit of overkill, but sailing has been smooth. Subs still running well, rarely do they even break a sweat..

At that time, I was also looking at the e. design subs. They have been plagued with problems, so I made the right choice.

Has CHT gone out of business? The forum is gone, yes?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15,247 Posts
Chase and TAI joined forces and is now known as Chane. ED went belly up and so did Epik. More folks got shafted on the former.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
808 Posts
Chase and TAI joined forces and is now known as Chane. ED went belly up and so did Epik. More folks got shafted on the former.
I considered a sub (subs) from E Designs. Fortunately I went with CHT. I now see story after story about ED (lol) subs malfunctioning after a short period of ownership.

There has always been some strong (and obsessive, remember FL Pool Boy) critics of CHT, but my experience has been completely positive.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
10,864 Posts
FWIW:

- Overall, my experience with the gear I bought through ChaseHT has been good, too.

- I can't say I'm a big fan of Craig or his style, but aside from one major customer complaint (whose validity, IMO, was questionable), both Craig and ChaseHT had a solid CS record. (And I haven't read about any issues with Chane so far.)

- FPB seemed to have an irrationally compulsive and comprehensive hatred of everything ChaseHT (company, products and owner). AVS cut him a surprising amount of spleen-venting slack.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15,247 Posts
I considered a sub (subs) from E Designs. Fortunately I went with CHT. I now see story after story about ED (lol) subs malfunctioning after a short period of ownership.

There has always been some strong (and obsessive, remember FL Pool Boy) critics of CHT, but my experience has been completely positive.
Read this story which will give some insight as to why ED started putting out sh!t and eventually went belly up, http://www.newtonindependent.com/newton_independent/2012/12/by-peter-hussmann-ben-milne-founder-of-the-cash-based-payment-provider-dwolla-and-mentor-to-the-des-moines-start-up-communi.html

The lawsuit appears to be dead in the water as Alex and Matt filed for bankruptcy.

WRT FPB, a very brief synopsis is that his subs did not perform as expected and that was tied to his measurements which did not support CHT's. The latter values if you'll recall tended to not be written in stone. Recently, another owner of the same sub sent it to Josh Ricci and his measurements supported FPB's, so there you go. My take on this is that Craig did not keep accurate records when it came to measurements and published some erroneous ones with questionable explanations. I don't see this happening with the Chane partnership. From all accounts, the new subs are quite well built and finished. Now this doesn't mean that all owners of the earlier iterations are displeased but I trust you understand.

Eljay, from talking to someone who saw those subs you were talking about at a GTG (they eventually wound up in tess's hands), they were pretty beat up looking.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,767 Posts
I am amazed at all the folks that can't let go of the past. I am glad not to waste anymore time on that old stuff. The past can't change for the anyone that felt they were treated wrong on the forum or disappointed that brought the small sealed sub and there, is so much more exciting stuff going on at Chane, PSA, Reaction Audio, or DIY that should make for better reading.
 
841 - 860 of 882 Posts
Top