Quote:
Originally Posted by D-Nice /forum/post/0
Ok, I will not reply to any of your posts that I do not want to answer going forward. It is mutually agreed that you understand when you do not see a response by me to your post it means I do not want to answer it and it does not require comments like "I'm disappointed D-Nice did not respond to my post".
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tempest261 /forum/post/21903334
Fine by me man.![]()
Quote:
Originally Posted by adb /forum/post/0
What part of his not wanting to deal with you don't you understand?
Quote:
Originally Posted by adb /forum/post/21903379
What part of his not wanting to deal with you don't you understand?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tempest261 /forum/post/21903489
??? I'm lost.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheshechic /forum/post/0
What's up with that?
I think a lot of people don't understand what it's like to have to say the same thing over and over, year after year. He answers the questions and some people just don't get it, so they ask the same question another way, he answers and then someone else asks the same question on another page. Instructions and discussion are available here and at hdj with the slides and include the same questions that keep getting repeated. Every time he tries to join a conversation or answer a question people start popping out with questions (often asked earlier in a thread). I don't know how often it happens, but IMO, it is often, someone wants to challenge the information he provided or his opinion. To make matters worse many of those challenging are not at his level of experience or knowledge and have formed their basis of argument from what others tell them or they have read on forums. Often those people just don't get the depth of his answer and often never do, instead they focus on his attitude. IMO, his attitude is often taken much too personally and with a lack of consideration or insight.
I admit, that I have been one of those people who have asked those questions etc. I just don't take the lack of response personally and I try not to badger and I'm not saying that anyone does so intentionally, nor am I directing this towards Tempest. I really did try not to interject myself into their exchange, its too bad that you didn't too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tempest261 /forum/post/21903334
Fine by me man.![]()
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tempest261 /forum/post/21903565
Truth be told I agree with you. But I think it would do everyone a favor if he takes my suggestion and posts frequently asked questions about topics such as his slides in those threads themselves. In fact, a giant "D-Nice FAQ" (or even better, a wiki) link posted in his sig would be awesome. Now of course he doesn't HAVE to do thisbut I think it could save him and everyone else some frustration in the future. There's a wealth of information that he has to offer, and I can totally understand how it can be frustrating for one person to have to frequently repeat answers to questions. Hell I might even start a page like this. I'm all for the exchange of valuable information.![]()
Quote:
Originally Posted by mnc /forum/post/21903364
While we are on the subject of calibrating, I think, can custom mode's gamma be raised higher to say 2.4 in the service menu?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tempest261 /forum/post/21903565
Truth be told I agree with you. But I think it would do everyone a favor if he takes my suggestion and posts frequently asked questions about topics such as his slides in those threads themselves. In fact, a giant "D-Nice FAQ" (or even better, a wiki) link posted in his sig would be awesome. Now of course he doesn't HAVE to do thisbut I think it could save him and everyone else some frustration in the future. There's a wealth of information that he has to offer, and I can totally understand how it can be frustrating for one person to have to frequently repeat answers to questions. Hell I might even start a page like this. I'm all for the exchange of valuable information.![]()
Quote:
Originally Posted by imws /forum/post/21903795
Can this set process 1080p24 properly and by that I mean displaying it at a multiple of 24Hz higher than 48Hz, also what about 3D crosstalk? Can any of the owners comment on that aspect of the set's performance?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TornadoTJ /forum/post/21903950
And 48 sucks
Quote:
Originally Posted by TornadoTJ /forum/post/21904138
It looks great on 60
It is permanent to what you pick, 48 or 60
Mainly because tv was originally 60 hz. But there is more to it. Some LCD sets can quadruple frames to make it 120, it just depends.
There isn't a proper spec. The normal method is 3:2 pull down