AVS Forum banner

41 - 60 of 1737 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
21,257 Posts
Joe,

back to your review. Do you perceive any improvements in using Motionflow and Reality Creation with this new Sony projector?
 
  • Like
Reactions: phara and joerod

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
23,946 Posts
Discussion Starter #42
Joe,

back to your review. Do you perceive any improvements in using Motionflow and Reality Creation with this new Sony projector?
Having the same chips theoretically there shouldn’t be but to our eyes we find the panning and extreme motion moments easier on the eyes. I have to credit this to the DFO. Less blurry more perceived sharpness makes a more pleasing image to our eyes. I am excited for the 5000 to get an update which will improve upon what is already a presentation to behold. Awesome to see them making improvements through firmware updates.

:)
 
  • Like
Reactions: phara

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,837 Posts
If no one else does by the time I get back into town I promise I will. Good idea. :)
Thanks. Very interested to see it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
18,787 Posts
You brought up the word biased not me. Cracks me up how you couldn’t wait to stop by in the owner’s thread to try and rain on the parade. I like Sony projectors. No secret there. I also plan to Review the NX9 when it finally shows up next year sometime.

And others who have seen it have been very positive about it. Even Craig Peer said it and the NX9 were best of show.

Either way the 995ES deserves a glowing review and I stand behind my comments.
True - I did like it. And I think the VW995 would look great on my screen. Which is just under 10' wide ( 118" to be exact ) and a ST130 ( 2.35:1 ). 4K HDR looks glorious - and nowhere near too bright - at even 47 foot lamberts on my screen. I actually measured my RS4500 with a light meter. All Kris is saying is for bright HDR, watch your screen size. That applies to just about any home theater projector - not just Sony. Even the VW5000 will have it's limits. Which is why Art has 2 stacked ! :eek:

Everyone needs one of these - https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00N5IPZ68/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o08_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1 or better ! :)
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
23,946 Posts
Discussion Starter #45
Craig, that was yesterday’s argument. I am not continuing it since this is the Owner’s thread. All I am saying is we can measure all we want but having the projectors on the same screen allow actual eyeball measurements. My people are all good and cannot tell the difference. Before when most had the VW1000/1100 rated at 2000 lumens how did we live? And Art has a Monster screen so he doesn’t count in the debate. And yes we all know how much you love your 4500. Lol

:)
 
  • Like
Reactions: phara

·
Registered
Joined
·
18,787 Posts
Craig, that was yesterday’s argument. I am not continuing it since this is the Owner’s thread. All I am saying is we can measure all we want but having the projectors on the same screen allow actual eyeball measurements. My people are all good and cannot tell the difference. Before when most had the VW1000/1100 rated at 2000 lumens how did we live? And Art has a Monster screen so he doesn’t count in the debate. And yes we all know how much you love your 4500. Lol

:)
That's cool. I just saw you mentioned my name and thought I'd add my 2 cents. These days picking a great projector is easy - the VW885 or 995 are great projectors. Most folks I deal with have a much harder time agonizing over what screen to get. Merry Xmas ! :)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
259 Posts
The heated debate on measurement vs subjective viewing is actually a vexed one. This parallels a similar debate within hifi audio. In this domain some audio engineers will only listen in a breif way relying heavily on the precision of their sound reproduction goals to produce the ‘perfect audio’. It is often the prelude to listeners finding the sound dull and lifeless or clinical and sterile or sometimes wonderfully musical. I do believe however that subjective listening experience is more important than measurement in many cases. Something can measure like a bag of nails and still sound wonderful.
In the case of how many lumens one should have on a screen for great HDR is just as vexed in my opinion. Measuring light output to determine the amount of light needed for satisfactory viewing is undoubtedly a helpful guide but not an absolute. It still depends on what the viewing experience is like. Without that the measurements have little meaning. HDR in the projector world is still in its infancy and there are still no hard and fast standards and we are all caught up in world of tweaking in an effort to gain a satisfying viewing experience. Ultimately the proof of the pudding is in the eating. Perhaps a compromise caveat could include the idea that the 995ES has been observed as a capable performer on screens larger than 10 foot for Both SDR and HDR. However, particularly with a view to light output, the buyer would do well to make sure the performance including the HDR performance is to their taste via a home demo.

Returning to Joerods review I thoroughly enjoyed the write up Joe and am now keen to home demo this tasty bit of kit asap. Many thanks,

Paul H
 

·
Registered
JVC RS4500 | ST130 G4 135" | MRX 720 | MC303 MC152 | 6.1.4: B&W 802D3, 805D3, 702S2 | 4x15 IB Subs
Joined
·
9,313 Posts
Craig, that was yesterday’s argument. I am not continuing it since this is the Owner’s thread.
Are we saying a discussion of whether the projector in this thread is good for screen size X is *out of scope* for the owners thread of said projector?

All I am saying is we can measure all we want but having the projectors on the same screen allow actual eyeball measurements. My people are all good and cannot tell the difference.
Sounds like a continuation of the discussion right there. Otherwise you'd have left this part out. Love it when people say they don't want to discuss something then leave their perspective in one last couple sentences.

Before when most had the VW1000/1100 rated at 2000 lumens how did we live?
Without HDR. That projector didn't even support it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,837 Posts
The heated debate on measurement vs subjective viewing is actually a vexed one. This parallels a similar debate within hifi audio. In this domain some audio engineers will only listen in a breif way relying heavily on the precision of their sound reproduction goals to produce the ‘perfect audio’. It is often the prelude to listeners finding the sound dull and lifeless or clinical and sterile or sometimes wonderfully musical. I do believe however that subjective listening experience is more important than measurement in many cases. Something can measure like a bag of nails and still sound wonderful.
In the case of how many lumens one should have on a screen for great HDR is just as vexed in my opinion. Measuring light output to determine the amount of light needed for satisfactory viewing is undoubtedly a helpful guide but not an absolute. It still depends on what the viewing experience is like. Without that the measurements have little meaning. HDR in the projector world is still in its infancy and there are still no hard and fast standards and we are all caught up in world of tweaking in an effort to gain a satisfying viewing experience. Ultimately the proof of the pudding is in the eating. Perhaps a compromise caveat could include the idea that the 995ES has been observed as a capable performer on screens larger than 10 foot for Both SDR and HDR. However, particularly with a view to light output, the buyer would do well to make sure the performance including the HDR performance is to their taste via a home demo.

Returning to Joerods review I thoroughly enjoyed the write up Joe and am now keen to home demo this tasty bit of kit asap. Many thanks,

Paul H
Indeed. One man's ideal luminance level might be one person's dull and flat or another person's eyeball seeringly bright.
 
  • Like
Reactions: joerod

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
23,946 Posts
Discussion Starter #50
As Holiday time approaches I am already getting messages from family members asking what movie options are on tap. Besides the usual “go-to” Christmas movies I like having a couple of new release options ready. I guess we will have Bad Times At The El Royale, Equalizer 2, The House With a Clock In Its Walls (kid option) and for my scary movie fans Hell Fest and the new Halloween. I will try and get some more screen shots...

:)
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
11,597 Posts
Indeed. One man's ideal luminance level might be one person's dull and flat or another person's eyeball seeringly bright.
Agree completely with this statement up until a point. We all know that HDR requires more light than SDR to work properly. The tone mapping in the Sony doesn't give you a lot of room for dialing in the tone map to bring up the first 100 nits so that the subjective brightness is comparable to SDR. So if the screen is too large, HDR will be limited to fL levels in the mid to upper teens. NO ONE will think that is bright and will probably find the image very dull. Joe's screen isn't that big, it is even smaller than mine. On my screen the majority of the HDR content I looked at looked great, but there are titles that look dull (BR2049 comes to mind). On my 11 ft wide screen I am getting about 24fL peak white. So if I went to a bigger screen, or a weave/perf, this would only go down and more titles would fall in the dull category (a complaint we already hear from HDR in general, even from flat panel owners).

You can indeed compensate for some of these issues with something like a Lumagen to adjust the tone map, the Panasonic 820 or 9000 or even an anamorphic lens. Only the latter can actually boost the overall brightness level of the projector, but the others will help with subjective brightness for those struggling with light output on larger screens. But the lower the light output you have to work with, the more aggressive the tone mapping becomes and you can easily start getting issues like clipping and banding. You can only fit so much signal in a small space.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,837 Posts
@Kris Deering

Have you already done a review of the 870 somewhere? I would very much like to read it if so. :)
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
11,597 Posts
@Kris Deering

Have you already done a review of the 870 somewhere? I would very much like to read it if so. :)
Wrapping up my measurments this week. Probably be online sometime in January (all in the hands of the publication).
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,837 Posts
Wrapping up my measurments this week. Probably be online sometime in January (all in the hands of the publication).
Splendid. I trust you will let us know when that happens? :)
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
23,946 Posts
Discussion Starter #55
So to sum it up- some people watch movies with a light meter and some just watch with their eyes. ;)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
18,787 Posts
Indeed. One man's ideal luminance level might be one person's dull and flat or another person's eyeball seeringly bright.
True, but without using measurements and data, it's not possible to plan for desired outcomes.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
18,787 Posts
So to sum it up- some people watch movies with a light meter and some just watch with their eyes. ;)
No, some people base theater design on easy to replicate repeatable data (a good light meter is only $ 170.00 after all - I have bottles of wine that cost more ), and some people just wing it. You wouldn't recommend someone hauling 8000 lb. loads over the Rockies to just get a 1/2 ton pickup with a 4 cylinder engine, would you ? It's all about having enough horsepower for the job.
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
19,108 Posts
Move on guys...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Paul Sim

·
Registered
Joined
·
29 Posts
WTF Joe. Do you even read the stuff you write? For one, you're not any more of an "owner" of this projector than I am. You're reviewing it, or did you decide to sell your 5000ES for it?

I also didn't come on this thread to rain on anyone's parade, I have not said a single bad thing about the projector. I just merely stated that this projector may not provide the amount of light needed for HDR playback on screens over 10 feet wide. That isn't a slam, it certainly doesn't say anything about the quality of the image either. It just helps inform prospective owners that may want the light output that most talk about for HDR (30 fL) that they may not want to spec a screen over 10 ft wide. I can say the same thing about A LOT of other projectors including most of the JVC lineup and the Sony lineup. Feel free to disagree with my commentary on the projector's actual performance when I actually publish it, but I haven't said anything about it yet.
While this may be true, isn’t it fair to say that there isn’t any projector out there short of the Sony 5000 that can accomplish the image quality and HDR brightness that most videophiles in here are looking for on a 11-12ft perf/weave ~0.8-1.0 gain screen? Its been that way for years and probably the one fact that everyone is already aware of and doesn’t appear to be changing anytime soon?

Lets face it, we still have a smattering of +/- 1600 lumen calibrated projectors from JVC, Sony, Epson, etc, The JVC 4500 that barely gets to HDR on a 12ft screen calibrated (maybe 2600 lumens at tornado fan speeds) and of course the Sony 5000 that can handle HDR easily on a 12ft screen at 1 gain.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,682 Posts
After owning the 5000 on a 14’ wide 1.0 gain screen I would never dip below a 5000 AL projector. That said, there is a huge hole that needs to be filled by Sony or even JVC for a 3000 AL projector for such scenarios as a 12’ wide or so (1.0 gain) or 13’ wide (1.3 gain) screen. This seems to be the sweet spot for the majority of theaters and instead many flirt with screens that are slightly too large for their 1800 AL projectors. I always thought for the 995’s price, it should have been bumped to at least 2500 AL or perhaps even 3000. I am sure the 995 is a great projector for the right screen size. It appears at a relatively high laser setting the 995 works fine for Joerod’s screen size, but I am sure that any bigger and a dim image would quickly result. Let’s not forget other factors such as the room colors, light control, throw distance... which can bring out a best case scenario image given a projector’s limited AL.
 
41 - 60 of 1737 Posts
Top