The perfect full field uniformity of the led light source on the dmd appears to translate to the individual micromirrors as well, improving perceived pixel fill(90% on 0.95" darkchip), reducing screen door effect, improving perceived resolution, especially in combination with madvrs ultra high quality downscaling. 1080p looks excellent.
600 lumens, while low, is bright enough for 20fl on a 100" 1.0 gain screen, or a 125" 2.35 screen with an A lens, or a 150" high power. In combination with the ultra wide gamut and ultra high ansi contrast the projector has a very bright appearance.
And while the LEDs lifespan is rated at 30,000 hours, the LEDs are duty cycled for sequential color, and power levels are reduced with dynamic black, drastically increasing lifespan. I have measured no light loss in 2500 hours.
A replacement to this projector does not seem to be slated for 2020, perhaps 2021. And perhaps if UHD video existed in 2009-2013 the projector would not have been discontinued. A replacement with the modern laser light source could very well yield up to 3000 lumens(only consuming 400w), and sans led etendue, irises, and lens improvements, could see a much improved native contrast. It also leaves adequate light output for zonal even at a full 50% light loss.
It may also be true that uhd video + sequential color + xpr + zonal may be too much processing and the industry is waiting for manufacturing to produce native 2160p panels to introduce zonal. I also really cant imagine Chinese companies caring about a Canadian patent lawsuit. Koreans certainly didnt care about an American one(re: smartphones).
We may very well be on the cusp of affordable 1500 lumen native 2160p 100% bt2020 true HDR DLP. It certainly looks like the most plausible path to trve HDR home projection, and all the boxes are almost checked for manufacturing to facilitate such a projector.