AVS Forum banner

1 - 20 of 26 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
21 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
(if there'd been a better section to post this in, please let me know)I'm currently considering buying a TV from the Philips Cinema 21:9 series, and would be grateful to anyone who could help me with precise answers to the following five questions:


1. In the manual, on p. 20, for the model

Philips Cinema 21:9 Platinum Series Smart LED TV with Ambilight Spectra 3 and Multi-view 147 cm (58") Ultra wide Full HD 3D Max 58PFL9956H,


it reads:

Picture format


[...]

• Unscaled

Expert mode for HD or PC input. Pixel for pixel display. Blackbars may appear with pictures from a PC.

( http://download.p4c.philips.com/files/5/58pfl9956h_12/58pfl9956h_12_dfu_eng.pdf )


Does this mean, that particular model allows for a native rendering of content fed in 720p over HDMI? (i.e., the resultant image would be windowboxed = much smaller, with black bars on all four sides)


2. How's the Ambilight for 16:9 or even 4:3 content? Since in those modes, there's a huge gap on the sides between the active picture and the casing edge where the colored Ambilight begins, what sensation does that evoke? Is it distracting, maybe even very annoying, or does it feel as natural as when watching 21:9 content?


3. Will any unusual aspect ratio work, especially, are SmileBox BDs (How the West Was Won, Windjammer: The Voyage of the Christian Radich, ...) supported, i.e. will the image be scaled correctly, without cropping anything? (see attachment for how a 2.37:1 screen – the Philips Cinema 21:9 TVs' actual format, despite the misleading "21:9" in the name – would, for example, properly represent a SmileBox image)


4. Does anybody know whether there's a version larger than 58'' in the works for European markets? (I do know about the Vizio XVT3D710CM 71'' 3D CinemaWide RAZOR LED Smart TV, but because of half-res 3D and for other reasons that one's not an option for me – also, that one's probably a ***** to get in Europe, anyway.) Maybe there was a recent tradeshow announcement or something?


5. I'm aware there are some BD players by Philips that feature some sort of "auto subtitle shift"*, but does it check out in real-world use with 21:9 (or thereabouts) content, i.e., is the shifting responsive enough? Are the fonts retained / is readability kept intact? And, most importantly, what about BDs that have [parts of the] subtitles placed in both the lower and the upper bar, will those be displayed correctly as well? If so, what do I have to look for (logo, marketing term) to be sure the support for shifting any kind of black-bar subs is there? (It doesn't matter what region the player is sold in.)


Thanks a great bunch

Count Alucard

*:

By the way, has this changed between recent models? I seem to recall reading about one only being able to move subtitles manually. If that's accurate, did pushing the subs in the lower black bar up also automatically bring down the ones placed in the upper image section, or were those then pushed out of the picture frame even further?

SmileBox image on a 2.37_1 screen, file size compressed.jpg 76k .jpg file
 

Attachments

·
Registered
Joined
·
27,260 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Count Alucard  /t/1420069/owners-of-philips-cinema-21-9-tvs-and-philips-bd-players-please-help#post_22215027


5. I'm aware there are some BD players by Philips that feature some sort of "auto subtitle shift"*, but does it check out in real-world use with 21:9 (or thereabouts) content, i.e., is the shifting responsive enough? Are the fonts retained / is readability kept intact? And, most importantly, what about BDs that have [parts of the] subtitles placed in both the lower and the upper bar, will those be displayed correctly as well? If so, what do I have to look for (logo, marketing term) to be sure the support for shifting any kind of black-bar subs is there? (It doesn't matter what region the player is sold in.)

I can't answer your questions about the TV, but I had (still have, boxed in a closet, actually) a Philips BD player with the Cinema 21:9 mode. This allows you to manually move the subtitles up or down using the arrow buttons on the remote. Other than the position, the feature doesn't otherwise alter the font of the subtitles.


You can move the subtitles as far up or down as you'd like.


Discs with subtitles in both the lower and upper letterbox bars are pretty rare, but it does happen (the 'Day Watch' Blu-ray, for example). Unfortunately, the subtitles are all tied together as one file. If you move the lower subtitles up into the movie image, it will push the upper subtitles higher off the screen. There's no way to "pinch" them so that some move up and some move down. It's all or nothing in whatever direction you choose. Like I said, though, this is pretty rare.


Only Philips players sold in international markets have this feature. The "Philips" electronics sold in North America are really just rebadged Funai products. If you live in North America, you'll want to import a Philips player from Hong Kong, which is Region A coded just like the U.S. (Or you can PM me, and I'll sell you mine for a song.)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,958 Posts
Smiley Box is the biggest (saddest) joke to played on the fans of widescreen. In the case of the Phillips TV, it will simply scale the image to fit its screen, which results in the removal of about 25% vertically. Because the "smile" letter boxing is curved, you may still see some of the center of the "smile". This also means you will lose the height of the tallest parts of the image.


As Josh stated, the 21:9 mode only allows subtitles to be moved and this is because the BD format as it stands is still 16:9 based. Bring on Folded Space and we might actually get to use this mode.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
27,260 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by CAVX  /t/1420069/owners-of-philips-cinema-21-9-tvs-and-philips-bd-players-please-help#post_22217558


Smiley Box is the biggest (saddest) joke to played on the fans of widescreen.

Do you not understand what Cinerama was? Cinerama doesn't really fit on a traditional flat screen no matter what you do.
Quote:
Because the "smile" letter boxing is curved, you may still see some of the center of the "smile". This also means you will lose the height of the tallest parts of the image.

Here's a simulation of what Smilebox looks like zoomed on a scope screen:




You don't lose anything too important, IMO.


From highest point to lowest, Smilebox measures about 1.95:1. With an external video processor, you can adjust the zoom to fit it on the screen like this:

 

·
Registered
Joined
·
21 Posts
Discussion Starter #5
Thanks for both of your replies – and what a bummer with regards to their contents!

Josh Z,


what model do you have, and when did you purchase it? I just perused the user manual to the

Philips 7000 Series Blu-ray Disc Player CinemaPerfect HD Smart TV Plus 3D BDP7700/12,


and in it, there isn't made any mention to "Cinema 21:9" (or "21:9", for that matter), anymore; instead, all that I could find with regards to subtitle placement are these two instances (on p. 11, left column, and on p. 19, right column, respectively):

• [Subtitle shift]: Change the subtitle position on the screen. Press ↑↓ to change the subtitle position.


• [Auto subtitle shift]: Enable or disable subtitle shift. If enabled, the subtitle position is changed automatically to fit the TV screen (this feature works with some Philips TVs only).

( http://download.p4c.philips.com/files/b/bdp7700_12/bdp7700_12_dfu_aen.pdf )


So maybe things have changed? In a way, so that the player software wouldn't "compress" the character layout, but just move the whole "package" alternatively up and down according to what's required, perhaps? Even then, tough, questions concerning responsiveness and reliability would remain in play.


Also, such a method obviously still wouldn't work for BDs where subs not only are placed in both bars, but appear at the same time as such – not sure whether there are any titles out there that do that, however, or is Dnevnoy dozor / Day Watch such an example? (would require very poor judgement to implement subtitles like that, as one cannot read something in different places at the same time, but you never know with people...)

CAVX,


dang, do you know that first-hand, shouldn't the thing recognize the exact point where image information begins and scale accordingly? (Or will it even crop other wide aspect ratios that are close to but not precisely 2.37:1?) Even if it "de-SmileBoxes" a film by default, I reckon it would still be possible to turn off auto format detection and set the display to the fixed [and pixel-matching] 16:9, correct? (The picture then shrinks slightly, so that you get additional screen-wide black bars at the top and bottom, but all the image information will be preserved.)


If you experienced the SmileBox cropping yourself and therefore have access to a Philips Cinema 21:9 TV set, could you also address the other issues raised?


To both, Josh Z and CAVX:


While I also have my own opinion of SmileBox (which is only an option in Warner's BD edition of How the West Was Won, i.e., no one is forced to watch it that way there), please, let's keep to the thread's topics. Thanks.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
27,260 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Count Alucard  /t/1420069/owners-of-philips-cinema-21-9-tvs-and-philips-bd-players-please-help#post_22218163


what model do you have, and when did you purchase it? I just perused the user manual to the
Philips 7000 Series Blu-ray Disc Player CinemaPerfect HD Smart TV Plus 3D BDP7700/12,

and in it, there isn't made any mention to "Cinema 21:9" (or "21:9", for that matter), anymore; instead, all that I could find with regards to subtitle placement are these two instances (on p. 11, left column, and on p. 19, right column, respectively):

The model I have is the BDP7300. This unit only has manual subtitle adjustment, no automated feature. That may have changed in later models, but I don't see how the player could know where the studio authored its subtitles to know whether it needs to move them or not. You don't want it to move subtitles on discs where they're already in the movie image, or else they'll be moved up to the middle of the screen on top of people's faces.


I should also point out that the Philips subtitle position resets back to the default when you eject the disc. In contrast, the subtitle setting in OPPO players is "sticky." Each implementation has its merits. Neither is necessarily better or worse than the other.
Quote:
In a way, so that the player software wouldn't "compress" the character layout, but just move the whole "package" alternatively up and down according to what's required, perhaps?

This is what happens in both Philips and OPPO players, yes.
Quote:
Also, such a method obviously still wouldn't work for BDs where subs not only are placed in both bars, but appear at the same time as such – not sure whether there are any titles out there that do that, however, or is Dnevnoy dozor / Day Watch such an example? (would require very poor judgement to implement subtitles like that, as one cannot read something in different places at the same time, but you never know with people...)

In Day Watch, the majority of subtitles are at the bottom of the screen, half in the picture and half in the lower letterbox bar. But there's at least one scene where they appear at the top of the screen instead. This was probably done because somebody thought the subtitles at the bottom were covering up important picture information in that scene. Honestly, it's not a big deal, and you're not missing anything important if you can't see the upper subtitles.


I have at least one DVD with subtitles simultaneously at the top and bottom of the screen. Dialogue is at the bottom, but translations of on-screen text are at the top. This was more annoying. Again, this is a very rare scenario.



Quote:
dang, do you know that first-hand, shouldn't the thing recognize the exact point where image information begins and scale accordingly?

I think you're asking a lot from the TV to do that. The scaling chips in these TVs aren't that powerful or intelligent. They basically just have simple zoom modes. You either set them for 16:9 or set them for scope.


Keep in mind that Blu-rays are all natively encoded as a 16:9 video file. They do not have aspect ratio flags that will tell the TV whether the image is letterboxed or not. The TV has no way of knowing. The sort of processing you describe where the TV intelligently analyzes the image to search for black bars requires a lot of horsepower.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,958 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Count Alucard  /t/1420069/owners-of-philips-cinema-21-9-tvs-and-philips-bd-players-please-help#post_22218163

CAVX,

dang, do you know that first-hand, shouldn't the thing recognize the exact point where image information begins and scale accordingly?

No it does not know the difference between a row of black pixels and ones that display colour. Whilst the Scaling might use complex algorthims, the math behind it is quite simple - 1080 x 0.75 = 810 and 810 x 1.3333333 = 1080*. Anything inside the 135 pixels top and 135 pixels below [including active picture] is cropped regardless.


[* = rounded]
Quote:
(Or will it even crop other wide aspect ratios that are close to but not precisely 2.37:1?) Even if it "de-SmileBoxes" a film by default, I reckon it would still be possible to turn off auto format detection and set the display to the fixed [and pixel-matching] 16:9, correct? (The picture then shrinks slightly, so that you get additional screen-wide black bars at the top and bottom, but all the image information will be preserved.)

If you experienced the SmileBox cropping yourself and therefore have access to a Philips Cinema 21:9 TV set, could you also address the other issues raised?

Not on the samples I have seen. The 21:9 TV fills the screen by applying both 1.33x VS to both the V and H directions. It does offer varying stretch modes which is no different to the progressive stretch found on some 16:9 TVs. This is not going to address the fine issue of 2.35:1 or 2.40:1 against the standard bi-cubic scaling used. In the end the pixel count that Josh posted is still correct where 2.35:1 has 816 vertical lines (8 top and 8 bottom are cropped) and 2.40 which uses 800 vertical pixels. Slivers of black bars are still present to fill in the gaps of 5 top and 5 bottom.
Quote:
To both, Josh Z and CAVX:

While I also have my own opinion of SmileBox (which is only an option in Warner's BD edition of How the West Was Won, i.e., no one is forced to watch it that way there), please, let's keep to the thread's topics. Thanks.[/size]

I have only seen screen caps from this title and all were smiley box and why was not impressed.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
21 Posts
Discussion Starter #8

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh Z  /t/1420069/owners-of-philips-cinema-21-9-tvs-and-philips-bd-players-please-help/0_100#post_22218769


The model I have is the BDP7300. This unit only has manual subtitle adjustment, no automated feature. That may have changed in later models, but I don't see how the player could know where the studio authored its subtitles to know whether it needs to move them or not. You don't want it to move subtitles on discs where they're already in the movie image, or else they'll be moved up to the middle of the screen on top of people's faces.

Yeah, true, but something seems to have been added, then, in newer models, but, again, the question remains whether or not it's worth anything.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh Z  /t/1420069/owners-of-philips-cinema-21-9-tvs-and-philips-bd-players-please-help/0_100#post_22218769


I think you're asking a lot from the TV to do that. The scaling chips in these TVs aren't that powerful or intelligent. They basically just have simple zoom modes. You either set them for 16:9 or set them for scope.


Keep in mind that Blu-rays are all natively encoded as a 16:9 video file. They do not have aspect ratio flags that will tell the TV whether the image is letterboxed or not. The TV has no way of knowing. The sort of processing you describe where the TV intelligently analyzes the image to search for black bars requires a lot of horsepower.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CAVX  /t/1420069/owners-of-philips-cinema-21-9-tvs-and-philips-bd-players-please-help/0_100#post_22219930


No it does not know the difference between a row of black pixels and ones that display colour.

Even if it only does one kind of scaling (1080 × ¾ ↔ 810 × 1⅓), how does it know when to scale, then, if the BDs aren't flagged and the TV doesn't employ some kind of black-bar pixel pattern detection?

Quote:
Originally Posted by CAVX  /t/1420069/owners-of-philips-cinema-21-9-tvs-and-philips-bd-players-please-help/0_100#post_22219930


Whilst the Scaling might use complex algorthims, the math behind it is quite simple - 1080 x 0.75 = 810 and 810 x 1.3333333 = 1080*. Anything inside the 135 pixels top and 135 pixels below [including active picture] is cropped regardless.


[* = rounded]
Quote:
Originally Posted by CAVX  /t/1420069/owners-of-philips-cinema-21-9-tvs-and-philips-bd-players-please-help/0_100#post_22219930


Not on the samples I have seen. The 21:9 TV fills the screen by applying both 1.33x VS to both the V and H directions. It does offer varying stretch modes which is no different to the progressive stretch found on some 16:9 TVs. This is not going to address the fine issue of 2.35:1 or 2.40:1 against the standard bi-cubic scaling used. In the end the pixel count that Josh posted is still correct where 2.35:1 has 816 vertical lines (8 top and 8 bottom are cropped) and 2.40 which uses 800 vertical pixels. Slivers of black bars are still present to fill in the gaps of 5 top and 5 bottom.

So, with the TV only knowing one real scaling / stretching / zooming mode, contents with an aspect ratio of 1.85:1 and 2.40:1, respectively, will both be presented ever so slightly letterboxed (in addition to bulky pillarboxing in the case of the former) and 2.35:1 is shown cropped, right? But what about "in-betweeners", then, what happens to films that are somewhere in the middle, like stuff in Super Panavision 70 / Todd-AO (2.20:1) or the rather exotically framed Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956) at 2.00:1?

The Sound of Music (1965), a Todd-AO (2.20:1) production, for example, scaled to height, would [correctly] look like this (with black bars on the sides):




Now, if scaled to width, 62 pixel lines total go MIA (with 31 rows each lost at the bottom and top):




(while this is not a shot where it seems to matter, >7⅟₁₀% of image information is cropped)


Is that really what this TV does when confronted with more unusual sources? Granted, my no-pixel-left-behind mentality might be unhealthy (and arguably somewhat conflicting, considering we're talking up-scaling here), but why release a wider TV, when the sucker doesn't even preserve what it sets out to make taller?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
23,130 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Count Alucard  /t/1420069/owners-of-philips-cinema-21-9-tvs-and-philips-bd-players-please-help#post_22224139


But what about "in-betweeners", then, what happens to films that are somewhere in the middle, like stuff in Super Panavision 70 / Todd-AO (2.20:1) or the rather exotically framed Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956) at 2.00:1?
The Sound of Music (1965), a Todd-AO (2.20:1) production, for example, scaled to height, would [correctly] look like this (with black bars on the sides):


Now, if scaled to width, 62 pixel lines total go MIA (with 31 rows each lost at the bottom and top):


(while this is not a shot where it seems to matter, >7⅟₁₀% of image information is cropped)

Is that really what this TV does when confronted with more unusual sources? Granted, my no-pixel-left-behind mentality might be unhealthy (and arguably somewhat conflicting, considering we're talking up-scaling here), but why release a wider TV, when the sucker doesn't even preserve what it sets out to make taller?

You need something like a Lumagen that can do custom crop/pillarboxing.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
27,260 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Count Alucard  /t/1420069/owners-of-philips-cinema-21-9-tvs-and-philips-bd-players-please-help#post_22224139


Even if it only does one kind of scaling (1080 × ¾ ↔ 810 × 1⅓), how does it know when to scale, then, if the BDs aren't flagged and the TV doesn't employ some kind of black-bar pixel pattern detection?

You push the Aspect Ratio button on the remote. The TV doesn't know what you're watching. It just receives a 16:9 video signal. You have to tell it when you want it to zoom.
Quote:
But what about "in-betweeners", then, what happens to films that are somewhere in the middle, like stuff in Super Panavision 70 / Todd-AO (2.20:1) or the rather exotically framed Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956) at 2.00:1?

If this is something that concerns you, you need an outboard video processor with full aspect ratio control, such as the Lumagen models that stranger89 mentioned.


Even on a video processor, you will still need to manually set the zoom for each disc. You're not going to find 100% full automation on a consumer product.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2 Posts
Smilebox is one of those useless features. Ambilight should be about the same regardless of aspect I would think.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
21 Posts
Discussion Starter #12

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh Z  /t/1420069/owners-of-philips-cinema-21-9-tvs-and-philips-bd-players-please-help/0_100#post_22227293


You push the Aspect Ratio button on the remote. The TV doesn't know what you're watching. It just receives a 16:9 video signal. You have to tell it when you want it to zoom.

In the manual, on p. 20, for the model mentioned in the first post, it reads:

Picture format


[...]

• Auto zoom

Automatically zooms the picture in to fill the screen as much as possible without distortion. Black bars may be visible. Not fit for PC input.

( http://download.p4c.philips.com/files/5/58pfl9956h_12/58pfl9956h_12_dfu_eng.pdf )


So, that's not what I'm looking for, then? Does it zoom in to height (retaining the correct proportions?), but not employ the engine dedicated to full-width scaling in the process? (By the way, why shouldn't it be "fit for PC input"?)

Quote:
Originally Posted by stanger89  /t/1420069/owners-of-philips-cinema-21-9-tvs-and-philips-bd-players-please-help/0_100#post_22225889


You need something like a Lumagen that can do custom crop/pillarboxing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh Z  /t/1420069/owners-of-philips-cinema-21-9-tvs-and-philips-bd-players-please-help/0_100#post_22227293


If this is something that concerns you, you need an outboard video processor with full aspect ratio control, such as the Lumagen models that stranger89 mentioned.

... which costs about as much as the TV itself... – and re-complicates what should've gotten easier and more convenient. Still, it's a solution, so thanks for pointing that out. (I would imagine that's what some of you guys use in your CIH-projection setups, right?)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh Z  /t/1420069/owners-of-philips-cinema-21-9-tvs-and-philips-bd-players-please-help/0_100#post_22227293


Even on a video processor, you will still need to manually set the zoom for each disc. You're not going to find 100% full automation on a consumer product.

Am I right in assuming that the

Panasonic PT-AE7000 / PT-AT5000E 16:9 Full HD 3D Home Cinema Projector


could do just that, i.e., switching zoom levels on the fly and knowing by itself when to do so?


I thought I saw some YouTube video a while back where that was demonstrated by example of the IMAX scenes in the The Dark Knight (2008). It seemed to work reasonably well – although with some delay. (Yeah, I know, there's no image rendering involved, but it does detect the black bars automatically.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben14  /t/1420069/owners-of-philips-cinema-21-9-tvs-and-philips-bd-players-please-help/0_100#post_22227567


Ambilight should be about the same regardless of aspect I would think.

Did you witness that yourself with content in 16:9 or even [close to] 4:3? Let's take this shot from The Wizard of Oz (1939):




One would assume the Ambilight portion on the left to gleam yellow-ish in accordance with the on-screen action. Now, with the normally continuous on-screen–Ambilight "glow" interrupted by large patches of black, isn't that distracting, irritating to the eyes, thereby making one feel uneasy / queasy / vexed?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
23,130 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Count Alucard  /t/1420069/owners-of-philips-cinema-21-9-tvs-and-philips-bd-players-please-help#post_22229614


... which costs about as much as the TV itself... – and re-complicates what should've gotten easier and more convenient. Still, it's a solution, so thanks for pointing that out. (I would imagine that's what some of you guys use in your CIH-projection setups, right?)

It doesn't need to complicate things, if you've got a good programmable remote it can be pretty seamless, though you do have to hit a button to do the change.
Quote:
Am I right in assuming that the
Panasonic PT-AE7000 / PT-AT5000E 16:9 Full HD 3D Home Cinema Projector

could do just that, i.e., switching zoom levels on the fly and knowing by itself when to do so?

My understanding is that while it can detect and auto switch, it's still just a fixed 1.33x zoom/crop, it's not dynamic based on the actual picture. It just detects bars and assumes scope and switches into scope mode.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
27,260 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben14  /t/1420069/owners-of-philips-cinema-21-9-tvs-and-philips-bd-players-please-help#post_22227567


Smilebox is one of those useless features.

Again, I have to ask whether you guys who say this know what Cinerama was or how Cinerama movies were photographed. Cinerama was designed and intended to be projected onto a curved screen. It does not fit onto a regular flat screen without compromise.


You might as well say that letterboxing is a useless feature.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IanRW

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,958 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh Z  /t/1420069/owners-of-philips-cinema-21-9-tvs-and-philips-bd-players-please-help#post_22229747


Again, I have to ask whether you guys who say this know what Cinerama was or how Cinerama movies were photographed. Cinerama was designed and intended to be projected onto a curved screen. It does not fit onto a regular flat screen without compromise.

You might as well say that letterboxing is a useless feature.

I think the comments stem from the fact that a Cinerama curved screen is actually CIH. It doesn't get taller at the edges like the smile box transfer does.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,958 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Count Alucard  /t/1420069/owners-of-philips-cinema-21-9-tvs-and-philips-bd-players-please-help#post_22224139



So, with the TV only knowing one real scaling / stretching / zooming mode, contents with an aspect ratio of 1.85:1 and 2.40:1, respectively, will both be presented ever so slightly letterboxed (in addition to bulky pillarboxing in the case of the former) and 2.35:1 is shown cropped, right? But what about "in-betweeners", then, what happens to films that are somewhere in the middle, like stuff in Super Panavision 70 / Todd-AO (2.20:1) or the rather exotically framed Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956) at 2.00:1?

TBH, I've never played 1.85:1, 2.0:1 or 2.20:1 on one of these TVs. The point is that the best format we have today just letterboxes these ARs, so the TV should just deal with them like it does for any letter box. In the case of 1.85:1, it should (if mapping 1:1) have side pillars and slivers of black top and bottom. BD is still based on CIW once the AR exceeds the native AR of 1.78:1. Until a technology like Folded Space is passed by the SMPTE, the manufactures of these TVs really can't do anything about that.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
27,260 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by CAVX  /t/1420069/owners-of-philips-cinema-21-9-tvs-and-philips-bd-players-please-help#post_22231866


I think the comments stem from the fact that a Cinerama curved screen is actually CIH. It doesn't get taller at the edges like the smile box transfer does.

How else do you propose simulating the appearance of a curved image on a flat screen?


When you sit in front of a curved screen, the sides of the screen closest to you will occupy more of your field of vision and will seem taller than the center, which is further away. Cinerama screens had a 146-degree curve, which is much steeper than other curved cinema screens.


The flat letterboxed transfer of How the West Was Won has serious geometric distortion in objects on screen, because the three cameras were all pointing in different directions. For example, when Jimmy Stewart paddles his canoe from the left side of the screen to the right, the boat sharply bends at each of the image join lines. That is rectified in the Smilebox transfer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IanRW

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,958 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh Z  /t/1420069/owners-of-philips-cinema-21-9-tvs-and-philips-bd-players-please-help#post_22232477


How else do you propose simulating the appearance of a curved image on a flat screen?

You can't and this is nothing more than a gimmicky attempt at doing so. Reducing the centre does not make it a 3D space (which technically all curved screens are) and therefore forced perspective (which generally fools us in flat 2D images) does not work here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh Z  /t/1420069/owners-of-philips-cinema-21-9-tvs-and-philips-bd-players-please-help#post_22232477


When you sit in front of a curved screen, the sides of the screen closest to you will occupy more of your field of vision and will seem taller than the center, which is further away. Cinerama screens had a 146-degree curve, which is much steeper than other curved cinema screens.

Because it was supposed to provide a wrap around visual experience like OMNI MAX (domes) do. Curved CinemaScope screens are used primarily to correct pincushion caused by the anamorphic lens. When I watch images on my curved screen, the geometry of the images on screen are straight even though the screen itself is not. Parts of the image at the edges are not taller than they are in the centre.


A system using 3 projectors (traditionally designed to project onto flat screens) should have produced 3 barreled images that would have been masked as part of their alignment.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh Z  /t/1420069/owners-of-philips-cinema-21-9-tvs-and-philips-bd-players-please-help#post_22232477


The flat letterboxed transfer of How the West Was Won has serious geometric distortion in objects on screen, because the three cameras were all pointing in different directions. For example, when Jimmy Stewart paddles his canoe from the left side of the screen to the right, the boat sharply bends at each of the image join lines. That is rectified in the Smilebox transfer.

I don't think I have seen the BD transfer of this title, so I can't really comment, but I am sure even the cinematic presentation of that film showed the same issues you just mentioned. It would be a bi-product of using three 2D images on a curved screen.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
27,260 Posts
Mark, if you haven't actually watched and compared both the letterbox and Smilebox transfers of the same movie (and HTWWW is currently the only Smilebox disc available, to my knowledge), then you really can't appreciate the benefits that Smilebox brings to the presentation of a Cinerama movie on a flat screen.


It's a compromise, yes, but it's a better compromise for those movies than the alternative.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,958 Posts
What is the alternative?


What AR would the Cinerama system be?
 
1 - 20 of 26 Posts
Top