Originally Posted by gregdpw /forum/post/12862659
Originally Posted by creemail /forum/post/12865594
The Panasonic's won't be head and shoulders over the Kuro series, but will better given the market prices. Most manufacturer's will start producing contrast ratio numbers on plasmas over 30,000:1, just to attract buyers.
Originally Posted by Nuance /forum/post/12866413
The reason that pic is that exaggerated is because the shutter speed was different (very long). Its not like that in person at all; talk to anyone who went to CES and saw it with their eyes and they'll say the same thing.
It's a ploy...shame on Pioneer (yes, I own a Kuro).
Originally Posted by 6SpeedTA95 /forum/post/12862696
The KURO's are pretty impressive not just for their black levels/contrast but their fantastic processing.
I'm a panasonic fan but have ruled them out UNLESS they will have improved processing this next year.
Originally Posted by davemak /forum/post/12871737
I agree the picture exaggerates the difference but blaming Pioneer for a photo taken by gizmodo is really not fair.(unless my sarcasm radar is way off)
Originally Posted by gregdpw /forum/post/12873338
yeah the sony and samsung 120hz lcds look really really nice. but they still arent that great for sports. lcds still have bad respons times. i think the new panasonic plasmas should be the way to go, for bang for the buck.