Is this old news or did it get lost in the shuffle?
Originally Posted by plasmalvr The review says that the black levels are slightly better on the Panasonic 8UK. 95+% of the buyers of plasma tv's don't want an industrial model. This means having to buy a tuner, speakers and other extras separately. You give up very little with the 4360- it's an awesome plasma tv. The media center alone makes the 4360 a better set up. All the wires hanging off the tv isn't as good of a set up. The other problem with the Panny's is that if you mount it on the wall it makes it difficult to get to all the connections. Panny's have a great picture, but it's not better than the Pioneer pictures. RicheyPoor, don't let the some of the propeller wearing video geeks in here intimidate you. Go for the Pioneer and do some research, you can find it for a good price. |
Good price? I can get the Panny 8UK for $2000 less than the Pioneer. |
Originally Posted by overtime Oh my. Panasonic Self Defense System activated! Really? Can you please show me where I can grab a 8UK for $$$-$$$? I'm looking at the referenced CNET link right now and the Pio is available for $$$-$$$. With such complete lack of objectivity I don't see any sense in debating the obvious advantages of the Pioneer. Black levels were the only Panny edge and thats pretty much gone now...oh well. overtime |
The simple fact is that they do rate the Panny higher in performance because of it's better black levels and less noise. |
Originally Posted by overtime Oh my. Panasonic Self Defense System activated! Really? Can you please show me where I can grab a 8UK for $$$-$$$? I'm looking at the referenced CNET link right now and the Pio is available for $$$-$$$. With such complete lack of objectivity I don't see any sense in debating the obvious advantages of the Pioneer. Black levels were the only Panny edge and thats pretty much gone now...oh well. overtime EDIT>> mod note: no price talk, please. MSRP only, thanks |
Originally Posted by plasmalvr ...RicheyPoor, don't let the some of the propeller wearing video geeks in here intimidate you. Go for the Pioneer and do some research, you can find it for a good price. |
Originally Posted by overtime In fact, there is no comparison made of the noise levels at all. How about that floating black level and the lack of shadow detail? Well everything is relative and apparently CNet didn't think the shortcomings of the panny PQ were as significant as those of the pio since they gave the panny the higher rating on performance, yes? My joke about the "Panasonic Self Defense System" was merely made because the OP didn't reference the Panny at all and yet the panabots had to come in and criticize the review. Oh well. And if you notice, unlike you with your exasperated rolling eyes icon, I put the winky after my comment to show that it was just a friendly dig. The fact is, I personally own neither a panny nor pio, and happen to think CNet reviews are not worth a whole lot in general... But I do find it rather amusing watching the different brand factions get all heated under the collar and duking it out though |
Originally Posted by overtime Sorry...what I was 'asking for' was purely rhetorical because no such pricing exists. Since the original person making the claim said... "Good price? I can get the Panny 8UK for $2000 less than the Pioneer." ...and it was not edited I'm going to go ahead and clarify this blatant falsehood by saying the difference in MSRP is $1500 but that retail pricing from legitimate vendors narrows the gap considerably. overtime |
Originally Posted by overtime Really? Can you please show me where I can grab a 8UK for $$$-$$$? I'm looking at the referenced CNET link right now and the Pio is available for $$$-$$$. |
And if you notice, unlike you with your exasperated rolling eyes icon, I put the winky after my comment to show that it was just a friendly dig. |
happen to think CNet reviews are not worth a whole lot in general... |
You clearly POSTED the NON-MSRP price availability of the pio(see your quote below). |
Originally Posted by overtime Actually, I responded in a rush and it didn't cross my mind that I was posting prices. I'll be more careful next time. overtime |
Originally Posted by Woodrow ...As it stands, the original Cnet link has also been removed. |
Originally Posted by RicheyPoor I can't believe you removed my link to a legitimate review because the reviewer (CNET) happened to have some advertising on the page border with prices that may not have been MSRP. I think it's obvious that the intent of my post was not to point to the pricing but to make it easier for interested forum members to locate the review. In my opinion your pulling of the link was heavy-handed and rather insulting to the membership as it implies that we must be all protected from seeing any pricing other than MSRP. I do agree with the forums policy of no pricing talk but it's clear that's not what was happening here. Lighten up! |