AVS Forum banner
  • Our native mobile app has a new name: Fora Communities. Learn more.

Plasmas as bright as LCD?

1775 Views 25 Replies 16 Participants Last post by  hhaller
Hi All,

Thanks in advance for any information you want to share, and for keeping flames to a minimum when you read my questions.


I've read a number of reviews, and virtually everything I read from tech sites still has plasmas a little ahead of LCDs for picture quality. However, I am a sucker for the brightness of the LCDs, and the "Soap Opera" effect where pictures are almost too bright and crisp. What I can't stand is motion blur, so I don't want to get an LCD and be disappointed, since the two most important things on the tv will be HD sports and movies, both of which are better on Plasma from all I've read.


The question is simple then - without going nuts, does a Plasma have the capabilities of being nearly as bright as an LCD. Not necessaryily Soap Opera bright, but less "natural" and more "crisp" perhaps than what most of you who are video savants would prefer or consider correct?


I know most of you are probably calling me at least a dork by now, if not something more strong
, but bottom line is that when I view LCD and Plasma side by side, the picture does catch the eye more on the LCD. I know the settings are designed to do that, and I know that most people say in a room at home the natural look of the plasma is better, but it is hard to disregard what looks to be a sharper, more clear picture on the LCD. But I don't actually want an LCD, so that's why I'm looking for feedback and hopefully some assurance that I really will be more happy with Plasma, given the issues LCDs have with the type of viewing I will be doing.


Thanks again for any assistance or information you want to share.

Gary
See less See more
1 - 20 of 26 Posts
Read about the "10 lumen per watt" plasma technology. Pioneer was a champion for advancing this. The trade off with lower lumen per watt technology is a darker picture. Next year, Panasonic will have brighter models. I don't know how expensive they will be though.
If the user has any inclination to achieve a decent picture, they'll dim their LCD anyways.


Go look in the LCD forum's calibration settings for each TV, all of them involve pretty significant dimming of the backlight.
You'll get used to the less brightness of Plasma after a little bit. Besides the LCD's on display at the store are cranked up in Vivid mode trying to catch your attention, which I guess it seems to be working on you. Only problem is the picture looks fake. Your going to end up turning down that brightness anyway. The Plasma going to have a better looking more natural looking picture. I've turned down the brightness on my own Plasma.
In the plasma universe, the Samsungs and LGs are noticeably brighter than the Panasonics and Pioneers.


Probably not coincidentally, the Samsungs and LGs have little or no antiglare coatings, whereas the Panasonics and Pioneers have quite noticeable antiglare treatments (which probably help their black levels a little bit too).
I think the compromise is to find a plasma with an ISF Day/Night picture modes, like the Pioneer pro monitors and Elite TV's. ISF Day can get plenty bright. Not as bright as an LCD, but the picture will be much, much better.

Quote:
In the plasma universe, the Samsungs and LGs are noticeably brighter than the Panasonics and Pioneers.

That depends on what modes you are using and if you care about whether or not you're clipping whites. A 9G Pioneer in ISFccc can hit an accurate 50-60ftL before clipping. Most Panasonics, Samsungs and LGs cannot. If you're passing judgement based on what you've seen on the wall at Best Buy, then, well, stop.
And by the way, Samsung uses three levels of AR coatings. The top-tier offering is quite strong.


As to the topic at hand: plasmas on average cannot compete with the peak light output of LCDs. If you desire a screaming bright picture then an LCD is likely what you'll require.
See less See more
Thanks tbird. Actually, I was at BB today just comparing pictures, and I realized that what I like is brighter whites rather than darker darks, rather than super bright "fake" overall. I am going to investigate the Samsung plasmas, as they seem to be brighter than the Panasonics as far as whites go, even though I know everyone says the blacks on Panasonics are better.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PrimeTime /forum/post/16826067


In the plasma universe, the Samsungs and LGs are noticeably brighter than the Panasonics and Pioneers.


Probably not coincidentally, the Samsungs and LGs have little or no antiglare coatings, whereas the Panasonics and Pioneers have quite noticeable antiglare treatments (which probably help their black levels a little bit too).

This years samsungs can get brighter than this years panasonics? The new panasonics can get very bright. And the higher level samsungs are supposed to have better AR than panasonic.

Quote:
Originally Posted by madness999 /forum/post/16826258


Thanks tbird. Actually, I was at BB today just comparing pictures, and I realized that what I like is brighter whites rather than darker darks, rather than super bright "fake" overall. I am going to investigate the Samsung plasmas, as they seem to be brighter than the Panasonics as far as whites go, even though I know everyone says the blacks on Panasonics are better.

The high ambient lighting in the retail stores will bias your eye. It's just not possible to really determine what you do and don't like due to this.

Quote:
Originally Posted by madness999 /forum/post/16820268


Hi All,

Thanks in advance for any information you want to share, and for keeping flames to a minimum when you read my questions.


I've read a number of reviews, and virtually everything I read from tech sites still has plasmas a little ahead of LCDs for picture quality. However, I am a sucker for the brightness of the LCDs, and the "Soap Opera" effect where pictures are almost too bright and crisp. What I can't stand is motion blur, so I don't want to get an LCD and be disappointed, since the two most important things on the tv will be HD sports and movies, both of which are better on Plasma from all I've read.


The question is simple then - without going nuts, does a Plasma have the capabilities of being nearly as bright as an LCD. Not necessaryily Soap Opera bright, but less "natural" and more "crisp" perhaps than what most of you who are video savants would prefer or consider correct?

snip

but it is hard to disregard what looks to be a sharper, more clear picture on the LCD. But I don't actually want an LCD, so that's why I'm looking for feedback and hopefully some assurance that I really will be more happy with Plasma, given the issues LCDs have with the type of viewing I will be doing.


Thanks again for any assistance or information you want to share.

Gary

hey Gary. your question is actually quite complex, so i will try to take it apart into a few pieces. the issue of brightness, crispness, naturalness, and clearness are all separate axes of analysis. now, when i first looked at lcds side by side with plasmas, it seemed that maybe the lcds had the edge when it came to "crispness" as well as brightness. both seemed pretty clear to me. but then i took the time to look at a high-end lcd for a good 15 minutes straight, and then looked at a high-end plasma for a while too, and i started coming to different opinions about them. first of all, when it comes to crispness, it seemed that the high-end plasma was no less crisp than the lcd, and that in fact all of the elements of the image on the screen appeared distinct. there is a "thickness" to the image that makes the lcd look cartoony and comparatively flat. as someone said in another post, looking at a good plasma is like looking through a window, whereas looking at a good lcd is like looking at an extremely detailed cg image. thus, ultimately, to me a good plasma looks much clearer than an lcd, and they are equally sharp. now the issue of brightness. according to all of the calibrators, lcds almost always have a far greater maximum light output than plasmas. i don't think there's really any doubt about that. on the other hand, i've seen high-end plasmas that looked just as bright as their lcd counterparts in actual action (for instance, a quality samsung plasma versus a quality samsung lcd). i would advise that you try to find a store where you can really look at such a comparison side by side and patiently look at the image for a long time. you might not have the same conclusions i did, but i think it would be worth it...
See less See more

Quote:
Originally Posted by tbird8450 /forum/post/16826146


..A 9G Pioneer in ISFccc can hit an accurate 50-60ftL before clipping....

Let me clarify that you would need an Elite for this (or possibly the M series?).


My 6020 didn't have this mode and to get the brighter modes you pretty much lost valuable picture controls and were forced to view in a color temperature that pushed blue and DRE.
See less See more
Let me start by stating that I have felt the same way as the OP when viewing LCD and plasmas in store.


I've had 3 plasmas and now an LCD. I will tell you that Samsung's LCDs are nice but when they are out of a bright light setting some flaws to become noticeable.


First, the TVs are set on vivid in stores and at home in a light controlled room that picture mode is excessively bright and just doesn't work. The added brightness for some content is definitely a plus and not having bright screens dim like plasma does with the ABL is nice. But with the good you'll also get bad. Samsung's new seriies LCDs auto-dim in darker scenes to help improve black levels. However the picture brightness shifts too much and dark scenes look dim compared to a good plasma. With fast action in games (I don't play many games that display this effect) but ghosting is definitely noticeable and this does not happen on a plasma. Black levels will start looking blue-ish on the B650 (and the B750 I had at home wasn't much better) in a room with controlled lighting. And if movies in a darkened room are a big priority to you get a Kuro. Black levels on the B650/B750 LCDs aren't even close to a Kuro.


The AMP effect can be neat on some stuff but it doesn't work on all video material. For gaming it provides no noticeable difference. And the sports I've watched so far doesn't look any different than on a plasma (at least that I've noticed thus far). Just an FYI.
See less See more

Quote:
Originally Posted by tbird8450 /forum/post/16826146


That depends on what modes you are using and if you care about whether or not you're clipping whites. A 9G Pioneer in ISFccc can hit an accurate 50-60ftL before clipping. Most Panasonics, Samsungs and LGs cannot.

I have seen dozens of these displays in a myriad of environments, and I have yet to see any Pioneer display appear as bright as the LGs/Samsungs that are fortunate enough to share shelf space with them.
Quote:
If you're passing judgement based on what you've seen on the wall at Best Buy, then, well, stop.
.

You can evaluate brightness and reflection issues quite well at Best Buy, especially if you can find the remote controls to fiddle with. And Costco is even better, as they have nice prominent highbay lighting that you can clearly observe bouncing off the displays.


At our Costco, they have three new Panasonics next to the lone LG. You can see the bright reflections of the ceiling lamps clearly and brightly on the LG, like a pane of plate glass. On the Panasonics the reflections are doubled (two different coating layers), muted and wavy, like some sealant that was sprayed on haphazardly. Comparing the displayed images, the LG sports noticeably whiter whites, while the Panasonics look like you just slipped on some fashion shades and forgot to put bleach in the washer.
See less See more

Quote:
Originally Posted by PrimeTime /forum/post/16834527


I have seen dozens of these displays in a myriad of environments, and I have yet to see any Pioneer display appear as bright as the LGs/Samsungs that are fortunate enough to share shelf space with them.


Tbird is correct, but he is referring to the ISF modes on the Pioneer...you wouldn't be able to see those in the store. Those modes have to be unlocked by a calibrator or by using ControlCAL.


I'm not sure what the peak brightness is on the picture modes of the Pannys or Samsungs, but I know that some of the standard modes on a Pioneer are pretty decent (but not as bright as ISF).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tazishere /forum/post/16820534


Read about the "10 lumen per watt" plasma technology. Pioneer was a champion for advancing this. The trade off with lower lumen per watt technology is a darker picture. Next year, Panasonic will have brighter models. I don't know how expensive they will be though.

The G10 should be brighter already.
At max brightness, both LCD and Plasma are too bright to watch. Just get a plasma for better picture and color, and you'll still have tons of headroom regarding brightness.

Quote:
Originally Posted by fourtytwoinch /forum/post/16826309


This years samsungs can get brighter than this years panasonics? The new panasonics can get very bright. And the higher level samsungs are supposed to have better AR than panasonic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hhaller /forum/post/16834712


Tbird is correct, but he is referring to the ISF modes on the Pioneer...you wouldn't be able to see those in the store. Those modes have to be unlocked by a calibrator or by using ControlCAL.


I'm not sure what the peak brightness is on the picture modes of the Pannys or Samsungs, but I know that some of the standard modes on a Pioneer are pretty decent (but not as bright as ISF).

According to reviews, the Panasonic NeoPDP's cap at over 90fL in Vivid with contrast maxed. I've never seen measures for LG or Samsung, but I would be very surprised if they reach that high. I would say there's next to no chance they exceed it by a noticeable margin. Most likely people are just comparing different picture modes and settings. Barring that, LG and Samsung may have less aggressive APL limiters for full field whites, or by default, their WB may err more blue giving the impression of brighter and more vivid whites. A bit of misinformation in this thread already. Samsung's have probably the most aggressive AR coatings of any current PDP manufacturer. This is one of their biggest advantages/draws and why they are usually the best choice for well lit or heavily windowed room.
See less See more

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orta /forum/post/16835144


Samsung's have probably the most aggressive AR coatings of any current PDP manufacturer.

Possibly true on the high-end models. It's certainly not the case with the 720p models, and hasn't been since the Purple Haze days a couple years ago.


Aside from that, I disagree with everything else you said. "Reviews" and other hearsay aside, most anyone who has seen these units side by side has come to the same conclusions as I have.


Dismissing the brightness deficit of plasmas versus LCDs, as usual, follows the old saw posted above the frontier General Store:

"If We Don't Have It, You Don't Need It!
See less See more

Quote:
You can evaluate brightness and reflection issues quite well at Best Buy

No, not always, since no Kuro at Best Buy will have the ISFccc modes unlocked, nor will any other brand of display that has ISFccc functionality.


As for judging reflections; sure, you can to a point. But your findings in the store won't necessarily translate into what you'd see in your livingroom. I personally don't know anyone whose livingroom even approaches the lighting conditions of Best Buy or Costco.
1 - 20 of 26 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top