Joined

·
257 Posts

4ohm + 4ohm + 4ohm = 12ohm

4ohm + 4ohm + 4ohm = 12ohm

Thats 24ohms, and when in parallel i divide 24/6 = 4ohm

Or do I divide just the top number (12) by 2 = 6ohm

Or something else Im not doing correctly

thanks guys!

1 - 14 of 14 Posts

Joined

·
257 Posts

4ohm + 4ohm + 4ohm = 12ohm

4ohm + 4ohm + 4ohm = 12ohm

Thats 24ohms, and when in parallel i divide 24/6 = 4ohm

Or do I divide just the top number (12) by 2 = 6ohm

Or something else Im not doing correctly

thanks guys!

Joined

·
257 Posts

Apparently you are the recipient of a US public school education. I know you understand what you are doing, but the mathematical notation is just plain wrong.Quote:

Originally Posted byAV Doogie/t/1418273/quick-question-on-ohms-for-speakers#post_22183046

1/4 + 1/4 + 1/4 = 1/x = 4/3 Ohms

No, you add the reciprocals of the impedances of the speakers, then take the reciprocal of that, as AV Doogie attempted to show.Quote:

Originally Posted byRoachforlife/t/1418273/quick-question-on-ohms-for-speakers#post_22182611

...when running things in parallel is the formula to divide by 2?

Assume three 4 ohm speakers. The reciprocal of 4 is ¼. So, add ¼ + ¼ + ¼ and you get ¾. The reciprocal of ¾ is 1⅓. So, running three 4 ohm speakers in parallel is like having a 1⅓ ohm speaker.

Your equation says:

1/4 + 1/4 + 1/4 = 1/x = 4/3 Ohms

By the transitive property of equality then:

1/4 + 1/4 + 1/4 = 4/3 Ohms

Do the arithmetic on the left side and you get:

3/4 = 4/3 Ohms

Which is obviously not true.

It is a common kind of mistake made by a lot of students in the USA because of the attrocious state of math education in the primary grades in most places.

I think what you wanted to say was:

1/4 + 1/4 + 1/4 = 1/x

x = 4/3 Ohms

You could also write it:

x = 1/(1/4 + 1/4 + 1/4) = 4/3

Assume we want to parallel two sets of three 4 ohm speakers in series. Three 4 ohm speakers in series gives us 12 ohms. The impedance when two sets are paralleled is:

1/(1/12 + 1/12) = 6

That happens to be 1/2 the impedance of one set in this case (divide by two as OP noted), but that is not always the case. In fact, you can count on it not being the case most of the time, unless you are paralleling two sets with the same impedance.

For most cases, the math can be shortened to the following, which may be useful to the op:

For series, add the resistances together.

For parallel, dived the resistance of one by the number being wired in parallel.

That holds true for cases where all speakers are the same impedance rating, or you are working with groups of speakers where all groups have the same effective impedance and you treat the group as one effective speaker. Which covers the majority of cases, including this one.

Joined

·
8 Posts

6.

Joined

·
1,942 Posts

1 / (1/12 + 1/12)

1 / (2/12)

1 / (1/6)

6

Series -> add the impedances

Parallel -> take the reciprocal of the sum of the reciprocals.

If you have two identical loads wired in parallel, yes you can just divide by 2.

Joined

·
1,608 Posts

It's just:

Zseries = Z1 + Z2 + Z3...

Zparallel = 1/(1/z1 + 1/z2 + 1/z3...)

So in the poster's example...4+4+4 = 12 (as he says)

and 1/(1/12 + 1/12) = 1/(2/12) = 1/(1/6) = 6

As has been stated.

With this formula you can calculate speakers that are different in resistance as well.

B.

1 - 14 of 14 Posts

Join the discussion

AVS Forum

A forum community dedicated to home theater owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about home audio/video, TVs, projectors, screens, receivers, speakers, projects, DIY’s, product reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!

Full Forum Listing
Recommended Communities

Join now to ask and comment!