AVS Forum banner
1 - 3 of 3 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,373 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Have a Ceton InfTV PCie 6 and Echo. Both rock solod, but recently seeing an occasional (maybe once on a couple of weeks) "Subscription Required" message on the Echo (not the HTPC itself). Ceton suggests it is in the WMC, not the Echo and downloading latest beta firmware. I am sort of reluctant to do that without talking to some of you who may also have seen this. It is also possible the wife pushed fast forward while watching live TV, which i think can give this message. (Unwilling to replace wife and no firmware upgrade available for her.)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
722 Posts
Last year a friend of mine upgraded GirlFriend 1.0 to Wife 1.0 and found that it's a memory hog leaving very little system resources for other applications. He is only now noticing that Wife 1.0 also is spawning Child-Processes which are further consuming valuable resources. No mention of this particular phenomena was included in the product brochure or the documentation, though other users have informed him that this is to be expected due to the nature of the application. Not only that, Wife 1.0 installs itself such that it is always launched at system initialization where it can monitor all other system activity. He's finding that some applications such as PokerNight 10.3, BeerBash 2.5, and PubNight 7.0 are no longer able to run in the system at all, crashing the system when selected (even though they always worked fine before).

At installation, Wife 1.0 provides no option as to the installation of undesired Plug-Ins such as MotherInLaw 55.8 and BrotherInLaw Beta release. Also, system performance seems to diminish with each passing day.

The features he'd like to see in the upcoming Wife 2.0 include:

- A"Don't remind me again" button
- Minimize button
- An install shield feature that allows Wife 2.0 to be installed with the option to uninstall at anytime without the loss of cache and other system resources.
An option to run the network driver in promiscuous mode which would allow the systems hardware
probe feature to be much more useful.

I myself decided to avoid all of the headaches associated with Wife 1.0 by sticking with Girlfriend 2.0. Even here, however, I found many problems. Apparently you cannot install Girlfriend 2.0 on top of Girlfriend 1.0. You must uninstall Girlfriend 1.0 first. Other users say this is a long standing bug which I should have been aware of. Apparently the versions of Girlfriend have conflicts over shared use of the I/O port. You think they would have fixed such a stupid bug by now. To make matters worse, The uninstall program for Girlfriend 1.0 doesn't work very well leaving undesirable
traces of the application in the system.

Another thing that sucks -- all versions of Girlfriend continually pop-up little annoying messages about the advantages of upgrading to Wife 1.0

BUG WARNING

Wife 1.0 has an undocumented bug. If you try to install Mistress 1.1 before uninstalling Wife 1.0, Wife 1.0 will delete MSMoney files before doing the uninstall itself. Then Mistress 1.1 will refuse to install, claiming insufficient resources.

BUG WORK-AROUNDS
To avoid the above bug, try installing Mistress 1.1 on a different system and never run any file transfer applications such as LapLink 6.0. Also, beware of similar shareware applications that have been known to carry viruses that may affect Wife 1.0.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,879 Posts
Awesome! :d

last year a friend of mine upgraded girlfriend 1.0 to wife 1.0 and found that it's a memory hog leaving very little system resources for other applications. He is only now noticing that wife 1.0 also is spawning child-processes which are further consuming valuable resources. No mention of this particular phenomena was included in the product brochure or the documentation, though other users have informed him that this is to be expected due to the nature of the application. Not only that, wife 1.0 installs itself such that it is always launched at system initialization where it can monitor all other system activity. He's finding that some applications such as pokernight 10.3, beerbash 2.5, and pubnight 7.0 are no longer able to run in the system at all, crashing the system when selected (even though they always worked fine before).

At installation, wife 1.0 provides no option as to the installation of undesired plug-ins such as motherinlaw 55.8 and brotherinlaw beta release. Also, system performance seems to diminish with each passing day.

The features he'd like to see in the upcoming wife 2.0 include:

- a"don't remind me again" button
- minimize button
- an install shield feature that allows wife 2.0 to be installed with the option to uninstall at anytime without the loss of cache and other system resources.
An option to run the network driver in promiscuous mode which would allow the systems hardware
probe feature to be much more useful.

I myself decided to avoid all of the headaches associated with wife 1.0 by sticking with girlfriend 2.0. Even here, however, i found many problems. Apparently you cannot install girlfriend 2.0 on top of girlfriend 1.0. You must uninstall girlfriend 1.0 first. Other users say this is a long standing bug which i should have been aware of. Apparently the versions of girlfriend have conflicts over shared use of the i/o port. You think they would have fixed such a stupid bug by now. To make matters worse, the uninstall program for girlfriend 1.0 doesn't work very well leaving undesirable
traces of the application in the system.

Another thing that sucks -- all versions of girlfriend continually pop-up little annoying messages about the advantages of upgrading to wife 1.0

bug warning

wife 1.0 has an undocumented bug. If you try to install mistress 1.1 before uninstalling wife 1.0, wife 1.0 will delete msmoney files before doing the uninstall itself. Then mistress 1.1 will refuse to install, claiming insufficient resources.

Bug work-arounds
to avoid the above bug, try installing mistress 1.1 on a different system and never run any file transfer applications such as laplink 6.0. Also, beware of similar shareware applications that have been known to carry viruses that may affect wife 1.0.
 
  • Like
Reactions: misterclick
1 - 3 of 3 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top