AVS Forum banner
  • Get an exclusive sneak peek into our new project. >>> Click Here

Samsung vs Sony

685 Views 7 Replies 7 Participants Last post by  sucha deal!
My wife and I both like the 50" Sony LCD RPTV and the Samsung 50" DLP RPTV. I would love any opinions as to which is better.


Our setup:


* Denon 3805

* Energy Take5 7.1 speakers

* Digital Cable (Timewarner)

* 15 x 25' room with lots of light


We need high viewing angles both H and V.


Thanks.
Status
Not open for further replies.
1 - 8 of 8 Posts
Well, anecdotal evidence from this board would indicate that the 2004 Sony's have fewer problems than 2004 Samsung's. People seem to love their 55WE655's except for the case design. Here Samsung's ultra thin bezel and black/silver color is a definite winner.


But if vertical viewing angle a deciding factor, then the Sony wins. LCD RPTV's are better at vertical angles. Don't know why. Still though, a kid sitting on the floor directly in front of either of these sets would have a hard time seeing the picture. Similarly, when you stand up, the picture dims noticeably.


But don't take my word for it. Go into a video retailer and walk up to the screen's and look down at them. Or lie on the floor if they'll let you.
They are both excellent sets - you can't go wrong with either. You need to spend time comparing them at local stores, and going with whichever looks best to your eyes (not the eyes of AVS posters).
Well, anecdotal evidence from this board would indicate that the 2004 Sony's have fewer problems than 2004 Samsung's.


With all due respect, you probably haven't been around here too long. There have been massive Sony b*tchfests as well as Samsung. The most amusing was a long thread about how every single Sony was doomed to explode or something (we are pretty sure the poster got that wrong). It goes in cycles. And you really can't coordinate # of complaints with reliability. A lot has to do with how many people bought the TV.


That said, what you can take away is that these TV's aren't foolproof and perfect. Be sure to buy from someplace with a good 30-day return policy, and from someplace you wouldn't have trouble returning it.

But don't take my word for it. Go into a video retailer and walk up to the screen's and look down at them. Or lie on the floor if they'll let you.


But I really agree with the rest of your post, especially the advice to go look at TV's yourself rather than just going by what you read.


PS - If someplace won't let you lie on the floor, don't give them $thousands for a TV :)
See less See more
With all due respect, you probably haven't been around here too long. There have been massive Sony b*tchfests as well as Samsung.

You're right I haven't been a member for long. That why I was careful to say 'anecdotal' and '2004'. I realize all the early GWIII owners had problems. But it seems much better with the GWIV. I'm not just going by the board, but by what sales staff at several different audio/video retailers have said. I know they were trying to steer me to/from the Sony's for various reasons, but they all sang the same tune: GWIII's had that one killer bulb/ballast issue, GWIV's seem trouble free so far. Depending on where I was leaning they spun that into a pro/anti Sony stance.


You're right on the money about 30-day returns. Don't be shy about returning a set that doesn't meet your expectations. The only thing worse than a $3K tv you have to return is being stuck with a $3K TV that's not up to your standards.


These newer technologies are... newer technologies, with all the caveats that implies.
See less See more
I would go with a Sony over Samsung any day. You should really be considering Panasonic and Mitsubishi if you can accept a DLP. Separating Sony LCD, Panasonic DLP and Mitsubishi DLP is a more difficult call.
I would only really trust myself with determining the picture quality of the tv. I was at a Tweeter the other day, and the manager would swear to the fact that the Mitsubishi dlps had a better picture than the 74 Samsungs. He was adamant that the Mits. tvs were the only ones that truly displayed blacks. I think he was crazy because: 1, he had not seen the new samsung tvs, and two, the old samsung had the brightest picture, and the Mits. the dimmest picture. I would not trust them with an analysis of any tv, because my opinion is what counts, and I probably know more about the tvs than they do. Actually, im sure I know more. Their expertise is knowing which tv is the most expensive.


For me though, it doesnt really matter what they say, because the Samsung 4674 is the only one that will fit in the space I have. So im not going to worry, because I know it will be a great tv.
FWIW, I spent a year trying to figure out what to get. I'm one of those shoppers that would easily regret a purchase if I knew that if I just waited a little longer, I could have gotten something better and cheaper. And while I was waiting to make a decision, the manufacturers would announce their new models and would cause me to wait some more!


I, too, narrowed my decision between the 50" Samsung DLP and the Sony GW3. Staring at both screens at a few different stores, I liked the picture of the Sony better. This is a personal preference but the Sony (as well as other RP LCDs) have a softer, matte-like appearance. Some say it's not quite a sharp looking as DLP, but I find it to be a more pleasing picture to look at. My suggestion is to observe both a movie as well as a HD video for comparison. Also, I liked the SD picture on the Sony better than the Samsung. Remember that there is still a relatively small amount of HD programming, and you'll be watching a lot of regular broadcasts. Not all stores have SD broadcasts but it's important to check this out.


I had read all about the problems with the Sony bulb and DLP's rainbow/headache effect. So, of course, I waited for the new models from both manufacturers that have been hyped over the last couple months.


I still liked the Sony picture better, but I didn't like the new enclosure on the 50" model either. I didn't see a noticeable improvement in the Samsung, even though the contrast was supposed to be better with the 8-segment color wheel. The new Sonys added CableCard & an HD Tuner, but I wasn't going to use either one, now or in the future. Other than that, there was not any reason to spend the extra money on the GW4. The GW3 was on sale and the bulb issues with the Sony had been resolved, and that's what I ended up getting.


So far I'm happy with my decision. Viewing angle is OK - the kids still lie on the floor to watch, and yet even with it's diminished brightness, they really don't care! But if viewing angle is super-important, you can always wait for the new LCD direct panels coming out next year, but they'll be at least twice as much as the rear projection.


At night, the Sony's blacks are dark gray, but the you get accustomed to it and the trade-off is the nice bright picture in the daytime. If you watch the TV at night with some lights on, it is not as obvious.


HD cable has been a bit of a disappointment. We have Cox and they are working with the Motorola 6412 dual-tuner HD-DVR, but are having major problems with HD resolution. That's a whole different story - you can check out my posts on those threads if you're interested. Anyway, hope this was a bit helpful.


Don
See less See more
1 - 8 of 8 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top