Originally Posted by Naylia Saw this elsewhere and hit up the EFF, it's ridiculous that they (MPAA and RIAA) want every analog input everywhere copy protected to prevent conversion to digital medium, i don't think Microsoft will like this one |
Originally Posted by telemike http://news.com.com/Pro-Hollywood+bi...3-6001825.html http://static.publicknowledge.org/pd...nalog-Hole.pdf Digital video recorders with analog tuners or inputs would only be allowed to record "copy-prohibited" shows for 90 minutes. After that, the digital recording must be "destroyed or otherwise rendered unusable." • Analog video output of "copy-prohibited" recordings would be permitted as long as it was to a VGA output with a resolution of no more than 720 pixels by 480 pixels. • Violations would be punished by civil penalties between $200 and $2,500 per product. Commercial offenders would be imprisoned for up to five years and fined not more than $500,000. • The two copy-protection systems that must be supported are Video Encoded Invisible Light--used in a Batmobile toy--and Content Generation Management System-Analog. Products manufactured and also sold to consumers before the law's restrictions kick in a year after its enactment would be legal to resell. |
Originally Posted by telemike Nobody care about the DVR 90 minute restriction? Record the copy protected version of "The Sopranos" (or other show) and you have 90 minutes to watch or it self erases......... Bull puckey. |
Originally Posted by pete4 Are you describing the new laws passed in Iran? I think you forgot the one with western music being forbiden. |
Originally Posted by kucharsk Copy Prohibited content, folks. The only copy prohibited content distributed by most providers is PPV content. |
Originally Posted by Thomas Desmond Just out of curiosity, is that actually in the proposed law? |