Now Available: Tech Talk Podcast with Scott Wilkinson, Episode 19 Click here for details.
Quote:
Originally Posted by img eL /forum/post/16826480
Yeah Wall to Wall!How big were u thinking about going? What PJ do u have?![]()
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobL /forum/post/16826531
Pssoble problems depending on situation.
Is PJ bright enough for the size and type of screen?
Wall/ceiling reflections? ie color of walls, etc.
Placement of speakers? Speakers placed behind screen with an AT screen works well for this type of situation. Otherwise you'll be compromising acoustics.
Bob
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobL /forum/post/16829056
I'm not familiar with those speakers but placement behind the screen is important as well. If they are freestanding speakers you will most likely have to treat the area behind the screen.
180" diag is big and you would need a PJ with a lot of lumens to fill it. I recommend finding what your screen gain would be and find out how many lumens you need to get 20 ft/l at the screen. This will account for bulb aging as they usually lose 50% or more of their brightness in their rated lifespan or plan on replacing the bulbs earlier than what they are rated. There are a number of calculators that can help you with this.
Once you know how many lumens you need read search some reviews and see which can put out the lumens you need in one of the PJs best modes. Many manufacturers' often state thier specs in its brightest mode and not in its best calibrated mode. So I wouldn't use most of the manufacturers' specs for their lumens ratings.
Bob
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Turk /forum/post/16829791
167" wide is a big screen...you'd need a hefty projector to make that work.
As another said, side reflections can become and issue. If you plan to make the edges of the wall by the screen black, (or at least really dark) you would be better than if they were white (or light).
Quote:
Originally Posted by MississippiMan /forum/post/16833554
Japan Dave,
As someone who revels in Large Screen applications, I'll say this....,
.....at 150" diagonal with either of the JVCs mentioned, and even if you have a screen that mneasures it's gain out at 1.3, you'll be getting just 12-13 fl to light up a screen, and that sort of screen (Accoustically Transparent) will not work well to utilize the given lumens in any case . And the "Big Picture" isn't something to look forward to if it's "Big & Dim".
Quote:
Originally Posted by MississippiMan /forum/post/16833554
If you like JVCs (...as much as I do....) then you'd do best with the RS-10 (1000 lumens). With that PJ you'd up the Foot lamberts to 15-16, dependent upon your Throw distance, which BTW, should be as short as possible to maximize your gain potential, as well as present the shapest image against the AT Screen's weave pattern. Others can advise you as to such positioning better than I, but about the only AT Screen I know of that will provide the Gain you need will come from SMX...and that will be by a "just barely" margin.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MississippiMan /forum/post/16833554
Jason mentioned that with aging you'll lose Lumens, and that means dealing with the "Luxury Tax" of replacing the Bulb after approx 1/2 it's projected life span. (...you keep it around though...as a "contengency bulb" should the fresher one go south just before the "Big Game" )
Quote:
Originally Posted by MississippiMan /forum/post/16833554
As long as you run the PJ of choice (RS-10?) on Full Lamp Output, and maintain a Light Controlled invironment, you'll be most likely very satisfied with the image. But drop beneath the suggested norms, and that calls off all bets. You do have one advantage though....you have no practical experience by which to compare results against, and in those cases, satisfaction does come a bit easier. Only the determinations and advice given by we who have such experience can make that equation a bit more problematical. Sometimes, a little extra knowledge can make you less apt to be as enthusiastic as blissful ignorance can.![]()
Quote:
Originally Posted by MississippiMan /forum/post/16833554
Oh yes...the treatment behind the AT Screen thingee. If you do not have a darkened area behind the Screen, what light that does manage to pass through the Screen's weave can...and most always will illuminate the Speaker behind, and either highlight reflective elements in it's construction (Cabinet Sheen...Decorative Trim) or in the least allow for a vaugue shadow to be seen when the image on the screen is exceedingly bright. Evert AT Screen owners must consider this, and the easiet thing to do is to back the AT Screen with a black, Gossiemer thin Drapery (Flat hued...no sheen) so as to prevent all the light you can from penetrating deep enough to illuminate anything (Wall or Speaker components) that lay behind it.
So there you are. Try shopping around for a brighter PJ, and perhaps you can spend a bit less for a Screen than SMX, but you most likely cannot find a better one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrisx510 /forum/post/16838854
Can the JVC projectors put out a nice picture at a 180"? Just curious. All the JVC projectors I have seen are all a 110-130" screen..
What projector would be recommended for a 180" besides JVC..?
I wish I can get a 180" screen in my room..That would be great!![]()
Quote:
Originally Posted by img eL /forum/post/16839373
Chris, Do it, yeah it won't look as good as u seen with 110"-130", 180" will still look amazing. Remember u would have to place your PJ back further. I plan on going 16 feet wide soon!![]()
![]()
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrisx510 /forum/post/16838854
Can the JVC projectors put out a nice picture at a 180"? Just curious. All the JVC projectors I have seen are all a 110-130" screen..
What projector would be recommended for a 180" besides JVC..?
I wish I can get a 180" screen in my room..That would be great!![]()
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Turk /forum/post/16840106
Technically yes, but you probably wouldn't much care for it.
Let's say you have a 180" diag. 16:9 screen (works out to about 88.25"x157" VA). That is 96.22'....big yes.
If you had an RS10 at the absolute best case scenario (shortest throw, high lamp, and you got a relatively good one)...you can figure about 900-1000 lumens (fresh lamp).
On a unity gain screen (1.0) that works out to 10.39 footlamberts (commercial theaters are 12-16 usually). Put that on a 1.3 gain and you are at 13.51).
The problems with this are first off, this is assuming all the above is true which may not be the case (for instance longer throw will drop light output). Moreover, lamps will dim as they get hours on them, so come 300-400 hours, figure you are now well below 10 footlamberts. Last, even at 13.5 or so, that really requires a PITCH BLACK room setup (no light colors, no windows, etc...).
So while from a numbers standpoint it could do it, you'd really have to have the stars align perfectly to happen and even still replace the lamp frequently.
All in all, not recommended.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MississippiMan /forum/post/16839608
Well Guys, these last few entries are a bit OT for the OP's intentions, but there are alternatives around.
I personally have accomplished "making" a 225" diagonal Screen and while using the JVC RS-1 (700 lumens) in a Controlled Lighting situation, but the method I used isn't appropriately discussed on this Forum (Screens) so if you have an interest, PM me and we'll go from there.
OP, the SMX Screen that has the highest Gain might well do your effort (...and the JVC-750) justice. And there are brighter 1080ps available as well. I'm currently in Perth, AU and cannot source all your options, but after the 22nd I'll readily be available to do so.
If I can conjure up a decent suggestion quickly while I'm still Down Under, I'll PM you with the info, and then you can Post up and relate your choice/direction to help other as well.