Sonos beats in-ceilings any day. Not even close.
However, if you have $2K you can get an EXCELLENT 3.1 or 2.1 system ... skipping surround speakers means no tripping hazards anyhow.
Sonos beats in-ceilings any day. Not even close.Moving into new house and I want to set something up for the living room. The room is open concept so there's no left or right wall and putting speakers around will just be odd and people might trip over.
I have 2 options-
1. Sonos route with arc,2 ones on the back and a sub. Total around 2k i think.
2. Get sub, receiver and install ceiling speakers - 4 or 6? Maybe 2k plus installation?
I am coming from listening audio through TV so either is a step up. The latter probably will cost me ~1k installation fees.
Not sure which is better choice. Definitely 1 is less intrusive and minimalistic. If I go with 2 what can I get in terms of receiver and sub and speakers? I think sonance, bw and Logan are some popular brands.
Advice? Thanks.
But the sonos setup has atmos no? For a 3.1 that means everything in front right? Like what the products and setup would be?Sonos beats in-ceilings any day. Not even close.
However, if you have $2K you can get an EXCELLENT 3.1 or 2.1 system ... skipping surround speakers means no tripping hazards anyhow.
The whole point of Atmos is to create a believable separation between ear level vs overhead sounds. That means using ear level speakers (in-wall, on-wall, or in-room) WITH overhead speakers (in-ceiling or on-ceiling, or "height" speakers as an ok-ish compromise if the former are not possible).But the sonos setup has atmos no? For a 3.1 that means everything in front right? Like what the products and setup would be?
The room is open concept so there's no left or right wall and putting speakers around will just be odd and people might trip over.
1. Sonos route with arc,2 ones on the back and a sub. Total around 2k i think.
2. Get sub, receiver and install ceiling speakers - 4 or 6? Maybe 2k plus installation?
Hmm,In that situation, I'd probably skip Atmos, do Sonos up front along with a sub, and do in ceiling for surrounds. Sonos plus in ceiling surrounds will be better than Sonos with Atmos and no surrounds, IMO. I'm with you about not having surround speakers standing around in the middle of the room. I was lucky enough to be able to use in wall for my surrounds, as even with walls, surrounds on stands were a no go aesthetically.
Ah yeah, to maintiain the simplicity of Sonos I'd probably use Sonos and just mount them on the ceiling. Should be fairly unobtrusive in white. This would also allow you to angle them properly.Hmm,
would the in ceilings be another brand that connects with sonos or sonos speakers but stationed up there?
Wait so I run wires on the two ones and set them on the ceiling vs putting the 2 ones on back left and right side walls? Aren't they same surround?Ah yeah, to maintiain the simplicity of Sonos I'd probably use Sonos and just mount them on the ceiling. Should be fairly unobtrusive in white. This would also allow you to angle them properly.
The room is open concept so there's no left or right wall and putting speakers around will just be odd and people might trip over.
No side walls but you could put the surrounds behind you on the rear wall? That could be an option…obviously, beside the MLP is optimal but we have to find the best compromise. Putting them behind you would leave you with the option to use real Atmos speakers mounted in the ceiling. I don't think Sonos can do real Atmos i.e. discrete channels mounted properly(overhead). So if you stick with Sonos, surrounds behind you, no Atmos.Wait so I run wires on the two ones and set them on the ceiling vs putting the 2 ones on back left and right side walls? Aren't they same surround?