AVS Forum banner
1 - 20 of 46 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
157 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Now that its been been about 6 years since darkchip 4 came out and other companies have made leeps and bounds since then shouldnt we be hearing about dakrchip 5 by now or soon? I mean sharp and jvc come out with new chips every year and they dont have that much sales volumes im sure theyre probably less than dlp what makes texas insturments so special? And now that they have darkchip 4 in what nearly 100000 cinemas dont they want to give cinemas a reason to upgrade? Its just baffling they havent announced something yet. Something has to be in the works right? Shouldnt we almost expect some new darkchip 5 announcement in the next few months? They announced darkchip 4 september 6th 2007. Once it hits 2014 it will be weird to see $50,000 projectors using 7 year old technology that is borderline ancient in terms of electronic time that was the year the departed won best picture and bush still had like a year and a half left in his presidency.


Then instead of people ogling over jvc projectors theyd be ogling over single chip dlps again like the old days.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,714 Posts

I would be reasonably happy with reduced pricing on 3 chip DC4 machines. Or the quality of something like the SIM2 M.150 at a more reasonable price.

 

Digital projection is just one market segment for DLP. Texas instruments sells DLP into a variety of markets and applications such as spectroscopy, measurement systems, optical scanning, optical meteorology, medical scanning, etc. and it looks like business is good.

 

TI seems to be busy with the more commercial implementations of DLP vs home theater.  But you're right, it would be exciting to see some improvements.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
23,130 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComputerTech0903  /t/1467016/shouldnt-this-be-the-yea...s-texas-insturments-just-stupid#post_23171140


And now that they have darkchip 4 in what nearly 100000 cinemas dont they want to give cinemas a reason to upgrade?

Cinemas use a completely different (larger) set of chips than home theater, I don't think they run "darkchip 4" DMDs in DCI projectors. Last I heard the "flagship" DMD for DCI was a 1.2" 4K DMD. On top of that, DCI specs call out only 2000:1 sequential contrast, you really don't need mega contrast in a theater due to the high ambient light levels caused by the required safety lighting.


If I had to guess, the next DMD we see (if we even see one) will probably be 4k, not an "improved" 1080p one.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
3,781 Posts
The problem with DLP is the mirror size. A dark chip 4 with the larger chip gives much better contrast than the Dark chip4 with the smaller chip. Bigger mirrors equal more reflected light, so better contrast. So the problem comes with larger mirrors requiring bigger chips will also requires bigger lenses. Good lenses cost money and I don't see that changing. You could maybe use a large dark chip 4 chip with a decent plastic lens and a dynamic iris to help reduce costs and have good performance. I'm not sure how that would work out, but that is the only way I see good DLPs breaking into the lower price points.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,206 Posts
The problem is that projectors are only a small market. Since companies stopped making DLP TV's the demand for home chips is way down. There is not much incentive for TI to spend the money to bring out a new chip. Hopefully I am wrong about this.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
10,827 Posts
Have you ever thought that the technology has reached it's limit? I'm sure if TI thought it was worth it they'd pour money into research and development but I'm sure their engineers know that it isn't feasible at the current chip sizes to get more contrast out of them. Like others have said, for much better contrast you'd need a larger chip size. but the catch 22 is that you'd also need larger optics. The cost then becomes way too high and could only be purchased by the same group who buys the uber expensive Sim2 projectors.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
998 Posts
I doubt TI will put any money into a new 1080p chip that is a significant improvement over DC4, more likely they will work on a 4K chip if anything. However currently only Christie, Barco and NEC are allowed to use TI's 4K DLP chips in their projectors (hence why SIm2's 4K is a re-engineered Christie). As Seegs said, the chips are larger and require larger optics etc. TI will probably try to produce a smaller 4K chip for the home market that is cheaper to manufacture and implement. The question is will it appear this year (if at all) and if so will the smaller maunfacturing process compromise overall performance compared to the larger 1080p chips?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15,365 Posts
So in terms of home theater projectors it looks like all our eggs are in the basket of companies like JVC and SONY...basically LCOS or bust for consumers like us looking for advances in image quality?
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
10,827 Posts
No. I still prefer the look of a .95" DC3 and DC4 DLP projector over Sony and JVCs LCoS 1080p machines. I always wondered why the high end companies stuck with DLP and didn't venture into LCoS. I think they are under the impression 3 chip DLP looks better than 3 chip LCoS when done correctly.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
777 Posts
I think that it is still hard to beat a good DLP unit with a solid lens and the larger chip. It is kind of sad that most people are missing out. Don't get me wrong some of the current model DLP units are good but they are not close to the quality of the last single chip units from Sim 2, Runco /Planar or Marantz.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
21,464 Posts
Quit bitchin. The DLP projector manufacturers each year state they use on the latest TI DLP chips and most of their customers don't know the latest chip is 6 years old.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
10,827 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by zombie10k  /t/1467016/shouldnt-this-be-the-yea...as-insturments-just-stupid/0_50#post_23172335


I wonder why Runco hasn't upgraded the LS5 for 3D. I would buy that projector if they added 3D capability.

It wouldn't be bright enough for a screen your size. 2D lumen output once calibrated is roughly 650 lumens.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
25,247 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobL  /t/1467016/shouldnt-this-be-the-yea...as-insturments-just-stupid/0_50#post_23171757


Bigger mirrors equal more reflected light, so better contrast.

They reflect as much more light contributing to blacks as to whites so on that basis CR is unchanged.


I believe the improvement comes from the increase in ratio of mirror area to mirror edge length, from which which light is reflected/refracted/scattered even when the mirrors are in the off position.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15,365 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seegs108  /t/1467016/shouldnt-this-be-the-yea...s-texas-insturments-just-stupid#post_23172262


No. I still prefer the look of a .95" DC3 and DC4 DLP projector over Sony and JVCs LCoS 1080p machines. I always wondered why the high end companies stuck with DLP and didn't venture into LCoS. I think they are under the impression 3 chip DLP looks better than 3 chip LCoS when done correctly.

Oh I definitely understand that a portion of us still prefer some of the DLP units, but I'm talking about the future, the road to advancing image quality in home projection. If there is going to be no, or minimal advancement undertaken by the DLP camp, while LCOS manufacturers continue to improve, it suggests that the future is in LCOS (or, at least, not DLP).
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15,106 Posts
They gave up because they can't obtain high lumens with high contrast with DLP due to limitations of the technology. I think they'd have to re-design it completely in order to get to the lumens we are getting out of todays' projectors and still get high contrast. There isn't that much point in making a new DC 5 machine which does 2000:1 on/off with 2000 lumens best-mode. Look at the Sony vw1000, near 1500 lumens calibrated. That isn't going to happen on a DLP with high contrast. There are many things they do beyond the DC chip to increase contrast in those higher-end PJ's of yesterday, they heavily coat the lens and light path as well as the mirrors, so there is always going to be the side effect of lower lumens from it because more of the light is absorbed rather than refracted or whatever. They'd need to do more than just DC 5, they'd need to re-do the way DLP works entirely and call it DLP v2. Many have said the DC chip is only helping 20% to 30%, the rest is the coatings and what not. No idea what would be possible if the budget were unlimited, but it never is, so that's not even an option to build some gargantuan optical system with triple coatings and a lamp that is 3x more powerful.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
157 Posts
Discussion Starter · #18 ·
How did they reach the contrast limits 6 years ago while lcos and LCD keep getting better.


You're saying in 6 years they couldn't get a 20% improvement.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15,106 Posts
I didn't say they couldn't get a 20% improvement, but that would hardly be comparable to an LCOS. They'd need 50% to 100% improvement.


I read the TI whitepaper on it, but it's foggy at this point, some people will remember me posting the PDF long ago. From what I remember, it was partly because the primary loss of contrast on a DLP happens at a different point in the light path than compared to an LCOS. There are more options with LCOS to add filters and what not, but the DLP has to be more open at a certain critical point due to the mirrors. So they are forced to use even more expensive optics to try to preserve what is left.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
21,464 Posts
the sim2 machines like the Lumis use DC4 chips and get plenty of on off using their implementation of a DI. The DC$ increases contrast over the DC$ by about 305. there is no reason to think a new chip could not bring a similar increase. the developmental and production costs probably couldn't be recouped however with the demise of rear projection panel DLP machines.
 
1 - 20 of 46 Posts
Top