AVS Forum banner

41 - 60 of 75 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
18 Posts
Thanks for the tips on the photo. I'll try to set that up this weekend. As far as comparing the Nero to the Marantz VP15S1, there is almost no comparison. The nero is FAR brighter but with MUCH better black levels. I would also say that the nero is sharper and with much more accurate colors. I do not see any rainbow effect, though I did not with the Marantz either.


Finally, a comment on 3D. I did not buy this projector for 3D but rather it was sold to me as the best 2D projector in my budget and that 3D was a bonus. Prior to owning the nero i viewed 3D as a gimmick that I wasn't even impressed with when i had seen other projectors in 3D. Basically, I just didn't "get it". With the nero, I still see 3D as bit of a gimmick, but an incredible and exciting gimmick that is a lot of fun. The nero is plenty bright in 3D (at full lamp output) for my viewing tastes and I am really impressed with the 3D effect.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
1,749 Posts
Thanks for you comments on the comparison. Your sharpness comment surprises me as I find the Marantz to be quite sharp. Using the same chip and both projectors having nice lenses I would expect this to be similar.


I agree that my Marantz is a bit too dim for my taste with my screen size. Brightness and black levels are the primary reasons I am now looking. I see rainbows occasionally on the Marantz but for me its not a big issue. Unless something else comes along I will most likely purchase the Nero or the Sony

4K after I decide which will be better for my theater. I don't care much about 3D either but if I had it I'm sure it would be fun.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
18 Posts
I was expecting the fan level to be much quieter than the Marantz. I find it to be only slightly quieter. Neither is noticeable during movie watching except in the quietest of scenes.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2 Posts
I watched Avatar 3D last evening on recenty installed Seymour Screen Excellence 4k AT 140" wide 16:9.


It was late and I intended to watch a few scenes... I ended up watching the entire movie...


Stunning 3D image from the Nero 3D2.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
29,683 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdrag /forum/post/21370666


I watched Avatar 3D last evening on recenty installed Seymour Screen Excellence 4k AT 140" wide 16:9.


It was late and I intended to watch a few scenes... I ended up watching the entire movie...


Stunning 3D image from the Nero 3D2.

You didn't waste any time getting that screen up.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,915 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by aks2023 /forum/post/21311945


I was expecting the fan level to be much quieter than the Marantz. I find it to be only slightly quieter. Neither is noticeable during movie watching except in the quietest of scenes.

I'm not surprised ref. difference in fan noise and was holding out hope it was going to be more silent, but a DLP projector it still is and I guess they will never be silent.


Still waiting on a professional review from a site or person but Sim2 seem to be where its at for me with the 3D-2.


Congrats to those that bought it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,915 Posts

Quote:
One of the other useful tests on the Spears & Munsil disc is the Dynamic Range High test which tests whether a display is reproducing all the video levels above reference white (235) up to peak white (255). This test is an easy way of spotting if a display is clipping above reference white and thus losing detail in the brighest parts of the image. The Nero 3D-2 was clearly clipping detail above 235, which means the projector is set up for the video standard of 16-235. Whilst there is nothing inherently wrong with this approach, a Blu-ray is capable of delivering up to 255, so ideally we would rather the Nero 3D-2 was set up to display from 16 up to 255.

Is this a major issue? Why would Sim2 not offer the choice considering the control they give you over everything else? And did I miss the contrast measurements?
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
1,749 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spizz /forum/post/21373075


Is this a major issue? Why would Sim2 not offer the choice considering the control they give you over everything else? And did I miss the contrast measurements?

It didn't seem to be a major issue but it does seem like this is something that might be corrected with a firmware update. I wonder if this is the same for the Lumis line?


I didn't see any measurement for contrast ratios or actual lumen output in the review. Does anyone know the speed the color wheel?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,915 Posts
Another review, this time on the 3D-1-

http://www.trustedreviews.com/sim2-n...ojector_review


In Comparison to its much bigger and much more expensive brother the Lumis Solo 3D-

Quote:
First, its 3D pictures aren’t as punchy, richly coloured, dynamic and bright as those of the Lumis 3D-S. Second, motion with 3D and 2D suffers slightly more with judder than it does on the Lumis 3D-S.


Third, the projector runs a little noisily - though at least the fan noise is very smooth and constant, which should enable a good installer to minimise its impact.


Our final ‘niggle’ is that under very particular source conditions you can see traces of the rainbow effect. The sort of ‘source conditions’ we’re talking about are predominantly those where extremely bright image content sits against really dark image content - for instance, the bright text information left onscreen while you wait for other areas to load when playing Skyrim.

Other than that they were impressed.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,915 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randall Morton /forum/post/21459602


Just to avoid confusion, this thread is on the Sim2 Nero 3D-2. Thanks for posting the review link anyway.

I did mention that before the link.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
1,749 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spizz /forum/post/21460392


I did mention that before the link.

I saw that you did but the title of the thread is for the 3D-2 and this could be easy to overlook.


I have a question about the 3D-1 vs the 3D-2. In the AVForums review it states in the introduction:


"In fact the light output is the only major difference between the three models, with the Nero 3D-1 rated at 1,600 lumens, the Nero 3D-2 rated at 2,000 lumens and the Nero 3D-HB rated at a massive 3,000 lumens."


Sim2's website is a bit confusing on this but it seems to me that the 3D-1 doesn't have the motorized iris control. Isn't this what gives the projector signifcantly higher contrast ratio? For me this would be quite a significant difference otherwise for the price difference I would be more interested in the 3D-1 with only 400 lumens less output.

http://www.avforums.com/review/SIM2-...or-Review.html
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
915 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randall Morton /forum/post/21460870


I saw that you did but the title of the thread is for the 3D-2 and this could be easy to overlook.


I have a question about the 3D-1 vs the 3D-2. In the AVForums review it states in the introduction:


"In fact the light output is the only major difference between the three models, with the Nero 3D-1 rated at 1,600 lumens, the Nero 3D-2 rated at 2,000 lumens and the Nero 3D-HB rated at a massive 3,000 lumens."


Sim2's website is a bit confusing on this but it seems to me that the 3D-1 doesn't have the motorized iris control. Isn't this what gives the projector signifcantly higher contrast ratio? For me this would be quite a significant difference otherwise for the price difference I would be more interested in the 3D-1 with only 400 lumens less output.

http://www.avforums.com/review/SIM2-...or-Review.html

Art Fierman at projector reviews measure the D65 output of the NERO 2D to be only 605 Lumens
http://www.projectorreviews.com/sim2...3d-2/index.php
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
292 Posts
I have a Nero 3D-2 since april this year. It's the sharper projector I've ever own even after Lumis Solo, Marant VP-11S2, JVC rs65. If you are not sensible to rainbows and have a small screen you won't fine a better image out there. This machine can be calibrated to perfection in minutes. So far I have around 1000 hours on the original lamp and have only lost around 15% of the light output. The dynamic black feature works pretty good until you need to use subtitles. I'd say the blacks are very impresive on this machine even without the dynamic black feature turned on.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
998 Posts
You mention the Nero is sharper than the Lumis Solo, would you care to comment on the differences in colour reproduction? Aside from shaprness, what else made you choose the Nero over the Lumis Solo?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,605 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by westex  /t/1372362/sim2-nero-3d-2-in-the-house#post_21199718


Wow, this is a great projector. Image is sharp as a razor, bright, and has very good contrast. A major upgrade from my Infocus 777/Kodak 333. Have not tried the 3D yet, just not that interested in 3D really. Avscience is a great company to do business with. I'm no expert and have not seen a lot of different projectors, but I can not imagine anything better than Sim2.

I would hope it's lot better at 25k:eek:
 
41 - 60 of 75 Posts
Top