AVS Forum banner

1 - 20 of 48 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
205 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Sony announces that it will keep the 4K name for the successor to 1080p, even though the Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) decided on the new "Ultra High Definition" name tag. They will instead be calling their products "4K Ultra High-Definition (4K UHD)."




Sony expresses their reasons:
Quote:
"As a leader at the forefront of new display technology such as HD, 3D and beyond," Sony began in a statement to The Verge, not sounding smug at all, "Sony lauds the CEA's efforts to come up with a common language to describe the next generation high-definition technology."

Sony also explained:
Quote:
"However, to ensure clarity for consumers and delineate between today's and tomorrow's technology, Sony will continue to use the 4K moniker for its products and will market its future products as 4K ultra high-definition (4K UHD)."

What do you think of Sony sticking it to the man? Will this just make things more complicated?
[Source]
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,745 Posts
Nah, serves CEA right for not consulting the only company to have a full production projector and the leader of flat panel displays...this is basically like Apple coming up with a new interface and not telling anyone else and CEA will befall the same fate...no one will use it. I hope they didn't have a buncha' suits working on this a long time cause its money wasted! I think its funny that CEA didn't consult Sony...I think they made the same mistake a decade ago...something called HD-DVD. Sony proved time and again that it doesn't matter what reason you have/how right you are...throw enough money at it and you'll eventually get your way.


Though I am happy that they tried to specify "The screen aspect ratio should be 16 by 9.", I think that's already been defeated by movies that were shot in


I finally agree with something Sony did...now, how about 4K blu-ray on the PS4(K), pretty please?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
439 Posts
Yeah, at least 4k has the virtue of being descriptive.


Ultra is marketing speak, signifying nothing. The strict sense of the word is extreme, and implies one can go no further, as in "ne plus ultra", which would be ridiculous. But of course they didn't choose it because of that. They just thought it sounded good.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
3,567 Posts
Let's face it. Sony is the one calling the shots for the 4K future, by simple virtue of the fact the have the media content to make it happen. No other electronics manufacture has the content the 4K hardware will need. Let's just hope they do not decide on another proprietary format and agree to implement HEVC for faster integration. Rumors are Sony, LG and Toshiba have already agreed on a 4K standard and we should know more after CES.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,154 Posts
dont really care whats its called personally, i just want to know how much extra stuff do i need to buy(other display and avr with 4k passthrough) and whether not we'll have another format war on our hands, even more expansive(and expensive) combo packs, or just make multilayer bluray discs that current 4k capable players can read.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,937 Posts
AIUI both 8k and 4k are described as Ultra High Definition by the ITU (who set broadcast standards) - so Sony are just being clear with their description.

UHD on its own could mean 4k or 8k. UHD 4k is unambiguous.


Think Sony's approach makes total sense - particularly if 4k and 8k devices are both available.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
983 Posts
Just like there's 720p HD and 1080p HD, it makes sense to use 4K UHD or 8K UHD.


Now let us see what kind of content should we expect for 4K displays, I also hope TV manufacturers don't forget about PQ and just focus on pixel count, it's ridiculous how slow the HDTV PQ development has been since 2008 and 9G Kuros.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
19,253 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by metallicaband  /t/1434786/sony-sticks-with-4k-name#post_22511766


Just like there's 720p HD and 1080p HD, it makes sense to use 4K UHD or 8K UHD.

Now let us see what kind of content should we expect for 4K displays, I also hope TV manufacturers don't forget about PQ and just focus on pixel count, it's ridiculous how slow the HDTV PQ development has been since 2008 and 9G Kuros.

It isn't what kind of content we should expect . . . it's when will UHD content become available. Everything I have read says 3 to 4 years.


Pioneer proved that building the very best PQ TV was regulated to a very small portion of the consumer marketplace that would pay the large premium for such a TV. When they pulled the plug on their Kuros, they were selling less than 450,000 per year. . . when 200 million TVs were sold per year.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
983 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee Stewart  /t/1434786/sony-sticks-with-4k-name#post_22511796


It isn't what kind of content we should expect . . . it's when will UHD content become available. Everything I have read says 3 to 4 years.

Pioneer proved that building the very best PQ TV was regulated to a very small portion of the consumer marketplace that would pay the large premium for such a TV. When they pulled the plug on their Kuros, they were selling less than 450,000 per year. . . when 200 million TVs were sold per year.

Yeah I too am wondering when will they actually utilize the newer resolutions which is why I really hope TV manufacturers won't forget about PQ and just focus on marketing gimmicks. Gaming being my main source and current consoles are FAR from even making full use of 1080p (everything is upscaled crap and PC games don't interest me much), I don't see 4K being fully utilized for a very long time, let alone the ridiculous screen sizes you'll need to actually see the improvements.


BTW just to be sure:


4K = 3840 x 2160 = 8 MP


8K = 7680 x 4320 = 33 MP


?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
368 Posts
I like "4k" better, it describes what it actually is. I don't really give a damn because I won't be getting 4k for a few years.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
19,253 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by metallicaband  /t/1434786/sony-sticks-with-4k-name#post_22511836


Yeah I too am wondering when will they actually utilize the newer resolutions which is why I really hope TV manufacturers won't forget about PQ and just focus on marketing gimmicks. Gaming being my main source and current consoles are FAR from even making full use of 1080p (everything is upscaled crap and PC games don't interest me much), I don't see 4K being fully utilized for a very long time, let alone the ridiculous screen sizes you'll need to actually see the improvements.

BTW just to be sure:

4K = 3840 x 2160 = 8 MP

8K = 7680 x 4320 = 33 MP

?

How they treat UHD will be up to the Hollywood studios. Will they go to 10 or 12 bit color space? Increase the Chroma Subsampling Rate to 4:2:2? Or will Hollywood cripple UHD by demanding they stay with 8 bit color space and leave the CSR at 4:2:0?

"Marginal Share" for 4K TV
Quote:
Customer demand for ultra-HD 4K TVs for the 2012-2017 period will remain "negligible" according to IHS iSuppli, despite tradeshow hype and a number of high-profile product launches.


According to the analyst global 4K TV shipments during the next 5 years will never account for more than 1% of the total LCD TV market-- shipments will grow from 4000 units in 2012 to 2.1 million by 2017 (or 0.8% of global LCD shipments for the year).
http://www.on-ce.eu/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1393:isuppli-qmarginal-shareq-for-4k-tv-&catid=24&Itemid=100038
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
19,253 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by kbeam418  /t/1434786/sony-sticks-with-4k-name#post_22511853


I like "4k" better, it describes what it actually is. I don't really give a damn because I won't be getting 4k for a few years.

Where do you see "4K" in the 3840x2160 pixel count? There is a 4K format for Digital Cinema which is not going to be used for consumer UHD. It is 4096x2160. That is where the moniker "4K" came from.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,817 Posts
Good for Sony is all I can say. Just because some panel decides to change the name dont mean Sony has to. They walk to the beat of their own drum....always have and always will. I dont care really either way because 4K wont be for me anytime soon because I am satisfied.....more then satisfied with what I have and I dont see that changing anytime soon. 1080p is more then good enough for me.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,937 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by metallicaband  /t/1434786/sony-sticks-with-4k-name#post_22511766


Now let us see what kind of content should we expect for 4K displays, I also hope TV manufacturers don't forget about PQ and just focus on pixel count, it's ridiculous how slow the HDTV PQ development has been since 2008 and 9G Kuros.

One of the hidden benefits of 4k displays is that they allow passive glasses viewing of 1080p 3D content without a loss of resolution. (i.e. you can show 2 x 1080p line eye feeds simultaneously on a 2160p vertical resolution 4k display - so avoid the flicker and cost of active glasses, but avoid the resolution loss that you get with passive 1080p displays which drop to 540p resolution with 3D content)


Sky in the UK have been shooting some sporting events in 4k as a test I believe - and as they control the entire chain from acquisition to set-top box, they could easily make 4k their 'next big thing'...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,015 Posts
BUT those TVs and projectors are NOT actually 4k so in a way its false marketing... thats why I like UltraHD as its not, it simply means anything higher then Current High Def, which for now is 720p and 1080p....
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,489 Posts
What 2160p is just too.... what? Why not just call it that.


The consumer "4k" displays won't actually have 4000 horizontal lines, and consumers are used to horizontal line counts, why change it? Anyways just give me some high bitrate "4k" feeds so I can downscale to my 1080p. Of course it will most likely be compress to the point that we'd be better of with 1080p video after a short time anyways.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
983 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Chaves  /t/1434786/sony-sticks-with-4k-name#post_22512130


thats why I like UltraHD as its not, it simply means anything higher then Current High Def, which for now is 720p and 1080p....

Shouldn't a resolution be at least 8MP to qualify as being UHD? That's way higher than 1080p.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
19,253 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Chaves  /t/1434786/sony-sticks-with-4k-name#post_22512130


BUT those TVs and projectors are NOT actually 4k so in a way its false marketing... thats why I like UltraHD as its not, it simply means anything higher then Current High Def, which for now is 720p and 1080p....

The Sony projector is a true 4K projector because they are using the same pixel count that they use for their Digital Cinema projectors; 4096x2160. But their new 84" LCD is not. It's 3840x2160.
 
1 - 20 of 48 Posts
Top