AVS Forum banner
1 - 11 of 11 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
11 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
After suffering for too long with a decade old Sony soundbar, and my wife complaining that I played the TV too loud while I still struggled to make out dialogue, I decided to upgrade my home theater sound. Unfortunately for my budget, my research led me through better soundbars, to the best soundbars, to entry level AVRs and modestly priced speakers, to where I am now after hitting the buy button on an RXV-2085. Being completely undecided on what speakers would work best, I figured the extra power of this Yamaha would give me more options than the Pioneer LX303 that was half the price.

My TV is in an 18x28 finished walkout basement with 8' ceilings. The TV is on the 18' wall with the stairs, the main listening postion is a couch about 9 feet from the tv, close to the center of the room. The couch is flanked by two chairs. Behind the couch is a dining room/gaming table and my sons computer desk. Upstairs, I already have a Yamaha stereo receiver with Polk Monitor ii 70s and a Cadence CSX-12 subwoofer in the living room and Pioneer FS52 speakers on zone 2 in the dining room. The subwoofer has seemed like overkill for music (metal, rock, folk). I found I liked the Polks much better than the Pioneer speakers for music. The Yamaha will be used 60% tv streamed through a Roku, 35% movies, also mostly streamed, and maybe 5% music.

Following the advice I have seen here, I made a point of visiting a Magnolia room. I auditioned Martin Logan Motion 40s, Definitive Technology 9040s, and Elac Debut towers. I was not impressed with the Elac Debuts, was pretty favorable to the Martin Logans, and was most impressed with the Definitive Technology speakers. The thing that most impressed me with the Deftechs was the wide sound stage (i think this is the right term), in fact, i thought they sounded best as a 2.0 system without a center speaker.

So I am looking for suggestions for speakers for home theater that I should compare to either the ML or Deftech speakers. I am more than willing to repurpose the subwoofer and a set of speakers from upstairs as well. I am interested in an Atmos system, but willing to start with a 3.1 and build from there too. I am currently considering these options:

1) Repurpose the FS52 and Cadence SW and add the atmos enabled BS-22A bookshelves for surrounds and the atmos top speaker for the towers. Negatives: the center speaker in this line seems to be poorly regarded. I have not been impressed with the speakers for music, they seem muffled compared to the Polks, and I don't know that I would like them any better for home cinema. But this would be a cheaper option.

2) There is currently a 5.0 Jamo 807 set on sale for $299 plus shipping. They look sharp and based on pricing for just the two towers, this seems like a steal. There is also a dedicated atmos add on speaker for the towers. Jamo reviews are pretty thin on the ground though, and I have no idea how these sound compared to other speakers. I would add my existing sub to this set.

3) Emotiva appears to be clearing out their speakers and the T1 and T2 towers seem to get excellent reviews. Since these also use a ribbon tweeter, it seems more likely they would be similar to the ML motion series. I could afford the T1 towers, C1 center, and drop in my existing subwoofer, surrounds and Atmos would have to be added later.

4) Just buy the Deftech 9040s. I don't know if they even need a subwoofer, but I would probably skip the center channel to start with.

From my reading, I am guessing I must prefer a brighter sound, based on the speakers I like? A wide soundstage and vocal clarity would be two important factors for me. The system will mostly be listened to at moderate volumes, so speakers that don't need to go loud to have good presence would be great. I already blew most of my budget on the AVR, and I would prefer to keep the initial speaker purchase below $800 (obviously, the deftechs would exceed that). Getting a full 5.1.4 system would be my ultimate plan, but my time in the Magnolia Room convinced me a 3.0 or even 2.0 system could be a huge improvement in immersion.

I have learned a lot searching through the archive here, thank you for any input or advice you might have on this.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
24,279 Posts
I have learned a lot searching through the archive here, thank you for any input or advice you might have on this.
As you liked the Deftecs and want to save a bit of money buy their smaller brother, the 9020.

9020 specs:

front speaker array: dual 3-1/2" BDSS midrange drivers and 1" annealed aluminum dome tweeter with silk surround for smooth, extended highs
rear speaker array: one 3-1/2" BDSS midrange
8" subwoofer with built-in 150-watt Class D amplifier
bass-reflex (slot ported) cabinet design
frequency response: 28-40,000 Hz

9040 specs:

front speaker array: dual 4-1/2" BDSS midrange drivers and 1" annealed aluminum dome tweeter with silk surround for smooth, extended highs
rear speaker array: one 4-1/2" BDSS midrange and 1" annealed aluminum dome tweeter with silk surround
8" subwoofer with built-in 300-watt Class D amplifier
two 8" passive bass radiators for enhanced output
bass-reflex (passive radiator) cabinet design
frequency response: 22-40,000 Hz

Best Buy, assuming they stock the 9020, will match this very low Amazon price.

https://www.amazon.com/Definitive-Technology-BP9020-Performance-Speaker/dp/B01F7AID4W
 

· Registered
Joined
·
11 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
As you liked the Deftecs and want to save a bit of money buy their smaller brother, the 9020.


Thank you. I had noted the tweeters were lower than ear level on these, so I had not asked to demo them. But that is a possibility. There seems to be a lot of love for the Emotiva and Chane speakers in this forum, I was wondering if any of those offered a similar sound to anything I have heard previously.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
32,752 Posts
3) Emotiva appears to be clearing out their speakers and the T1 and T2 towers seem to get excellent reviews. Since these also use a ribbon tweeter, it seems more likely they would be similar to the ML motion series. I could afford the T1 towers, C1 center, and drop in my existing subwoofer, surrounds and Atmos would have to be added later.
Since you liked the MLs, that's the route I'd go...maybe the T1s with the C1 and use your existing FS22 as surrounds for now. (Or you can get a bunch of NHT SuperZeros for around $50 apiece on Amazon, over half off MSRP, for both surrounds and Atmos speakers).

Another option is to home demo the Martin Logan LX16s from crutchfield.com --- $10 flat rate return shipping minimizes your risk, and there's no substitute for an in-home trial. You can get 3 for your front stage, ideally with the center one vertically aligned with the L/R speakers for a perfectly uniform soundstage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gajCA

· Registered
Joined
·
11 Posts
Discussion Starter · #6 ·
Have a look at the Polk LSiM 705's on sale at Adorama.



Thank you. I have looked at those, and the percentage discount from original price was really tempting. I found one pretty comprehensive roundup that included these at Home Theater Shack (I don't believe I can post links yet as a new member) and the review was kind of meh. Basically talked about them being extremely competent but boring? There are some deep layers to home theater, especially the terminology, that I don't entirely get, and I know opinions and likes are subjective. But boring could describe my opinion of the AJ Pioneers, so I may know what they are talking about. 2/3rds off is a stellar deal and I am confident my wife would love the look of those. Maybe I should try to talk her into trying them as replacements for the Monitor II 70s in the living room?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
11 Posts
Discussion Starter · #7 ·
Since you liked the MLs, that's the route I'd go...maybe the T1s with the C1 and use your existing FS22 as surrounds for now. (Or you can get a bunch of NHT SuperZeros for around $50 apiece on Amazon, over half off MSRP, for both surrounds and Atmos speakers).

Another option is to home demo the Martin Logan LX16s from crutchfield.com --- $10 flat rate return shipping minimizes your risk, and there's no substitute for an in-home trial. You can get 3 for your front stage, ideally with the center one vertically aligned with the L/R speakers for a perfectly uniform soundstage.

Thank you Zorba. Emotiva is the direction I am leaning. My continued compulsive researching turned up that the Emotiva speakers seem to tolerate being close to the wall behind them fairly well, which will be important as moving them three to four feet off the wall would not work at all.



I also remembered I have a pair of 8 year old Polk Monitor 40s still in the box. I may give those a try as surrounds first. The consensus I gathered from reading through different threads is timbre matching rear and atmos channels is less important (and I know you are one of the members who questions if it is critical even for the front).



I have narrowed down to either the t1 or the t2, vs the new wild card Chane 5.4. The T2 would seem to put the tweeter higher, though possibly as much over ear level as the T1 would be below ear level. If I am using a subwoofer, I don't know if there is really any other benefit to the T2 aside from height. But bigger is always better?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
11 Posts
Discussion Starter · #8 ·
(Or you can get a bunch of NHT SuperZeros for around $50 apiece on Amazon, over half off MSRP, for both surrounds and Atmos speakers).

Would this involve mounting the Superzeros at ceiling height for Atmos or placing them facing up for reflected sound? I have primarily been looking at Atmos speakers designed to sit on top of other speakers; cutting holes in the ceiling is not an option, but if there is a cheaper way I am very interested. Thank you for the feedback and assistance!
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
32,752 Posts
I have narrowed down to either the t1 or the t2, vs the new wild card Chane 5.4. The T2 would seem to put the tweeter higher, though possibly as much over ear level as the T1 would be below ear level. If I am using a subwoofer, I don't know if there is really any other benefit to the T2 aside from height. But bigger is always better?
Not sure "bigger is always better" when it comes to the T1 vs T2...unless you like to listen quite loudly, in which case the T2 does have a significantly higher sensitivity than the T1 IIRC. Your Cadence sub should be able to neutralize the bass difference during music listening otherwise.

The Chane A5.4 is an interesting possibility...would love to hear those in person.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
32,752 Posts
Would this involve mounting the Superzeros at ceiling height for Atmos or placing them facing up for reflected sound? I have primarily been looking at Atmos speakers designed to sit on top of other speakers; cutting holes in the ceiling is not an option, but if there is a cheaper way I am very interested. Thank you for the feedback and assistance!
The SZs are a compact, sealed cabinet design so you should be fine putting them on top of a normal speaker. Obviously they won't offer the same aesthetics as an integrated upfiring Atmos speaker from the same make/model but they should be perfectly capable of the task for a lot less money.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
11 Posts
Discussion Starter · #11 ·
Thank you

Thank you all for the assistance. I ended up pulling the trigger on the T1s and C1. I will play with what I have on hand for surrounds, see how I like it, and add or change from there. Hopefully everything arrives in time to play with it this weekend.
 
1 - 11 of 11 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top