[didi]

Hi,


I am running DScaler on a 466MHz Celeron, so I have always felt being on the low limit.


However, using DScaler 2.30 with the "drop no frames" mode I managed to get 0 DF/S and a decent picture quality.


Just tried DScaler 3.0A now and I get 9-12 DF/S with apparently the same settings.


Read something about "SleepInterval=0", which does not help the DF/S a bit.

However setting "SleepInterval=1" makes 2.30 run perfectly even in full screen mode. Otherwise the system would freeze when switching channels in full screen mode.


Why do I experience such a speed difference?

 

[JohnAd]

The actual code hjasn't changhes all that much, however the dfs reporting code has changes and now reports a much more accurate count.


If you have the hurry when late setting on you may get extra dropped frames reported now to what was reported before.


Also a few of the deinteralcing methods have become slighly more complex upping the processor requirements slightly.


Try lowering pixel width to 640.


John

 

[hobie_od]

What does pixel width represent?


TIA

JIM

 

[kchad]

number of pixels per line captured by your capture card.