How do you see that it performs similar?Anyone else a little disappointed with the results considering the hype of the driver? it looks to perform very similarly to the UXL.
How do you see that it performs similar? Referencing 100dB via Data-bass.com's results the UXL-18's roll off is at 36 Hz. The HST-18's roll off is at 26 Hz. It is also noted that Ricci stopped the UXL-18's distortion testing because the driver was having issues, where-as there was no mention of the HST-18 having any issues at all. All I am seeing is the HST-18 playing lower with similar HF extension compared to the UXL-18 with the HST-18 having actual distortion measurements taken on it. How is that similar performance?
If you are Ok with with ticking from the driver and/or higher than average distortion your window for suitable drivers may be huge compared to others.I know that the distortion numbers are a little lower but how much of that is actually audible? Their output numbers are extremely close to each other are they not? And the UXL-18 had a small advantage below 20hz doesn't?
If you are Ok with with ticking from the driver and/or higher than average distortion your window for suitable drivers may be huge compared to others.
Your comparison view is not correct at all. The HST-18 has +3 dB more output at 20 Hz in the basic response and 2 dB at 20 Hz in maximum long-term output compared to the UXL-18. Drag down the comparison tab on www.data-bass.com and see for yourself. Full-range response yields +3 Db more output at 20 Hz for the HST compared ato the UXL. How is that similar performane?
When I visited Josh in December 2013, I saw the HST-18 and commented about it to Josh. I thought you noted in a post that Josh sent that driver back to you and since the recent test was done this month... wasn't this test done with the latest version of the HST-18?Josh did not test the latest version.