Quote:
Originally posted by GreggPenn
FYI: You can buy Firehawk material and mount it also. You can buy it through this forum.
In your second comparison, you didn't mention additional perceptions of the FH vs HCCV vs ME. You only refer to the last two choices.
gp |
You're correct, I neglected to mention the comparison between ME/HCCV & FH. Here's the short version (pending having some time to complete the screenshots and detailed comparisons):
The Firehawk is a great material. There is no if, and, or but about it. For a digital projector with moderate light output the Firehawk is an excellent screen choice. Compared to the Da-Lite High Contrast Cinema Vision the Firehawk is slightly darker in colors, not quite as vibrant. This was a bit surprising to me, because of the advertised 1.35 gain of the FH vs. the 1.1 gain of the HCCV. The Firehawk has darker blacks than the HCCV, so I figure the gain figures are either skewed, or there is something in the emulsion that Stewart puts on the Firehawk that plays tricks on the color levels. Either way, the Firehawk looks great. The HCCV does not look bad, by any means, but it does not come anywhere near the black levels of the Firehawk. Color and white levels are only slightly better on the HCCV.
Now, as for the Misty Evening vs. Firehawk, it is (much) closer than the HCCV. The Misty evening does not have quite the black levels of the Firehawk, but it is not far off. The color reproduction, to me, looks a little be better on the Misty Evening, but this is also a very close call. Take a movie like "The Santa Clause 2", fast forward to I believe chapter 3 where they are in the workshop and Tim Allen is walking around observing the work of the Elves... the Firehawk gives "Santa" a gray beard, and a more merlot colored suit. The Misty Evening gives him a white beard and a more vibrant red colored suit (difference between sports car red and sedan red?). Now, which one is correct? I'm going to lean towards the ME being correct, as it looks slightly more like it does on a matte white screen. So, which one looks better? I think that if you spent 10 minutes watching either screen your eyes would adjust and you wouldn't notice the color difference. Especially since black levels are very good on both materials.
So... why would I be considering a HCCV screen at this point? After all, I've pretty much placed it third out of three here. The difference is, the HCCV screen is very good with colorful and bright scenes, and still much better than matte white on dark scenes. That, coupled with the fact that I can build one for about $1800 less than buying an equivalent sized Firehawk screen, leads me to find it
very appealing. Also, the Firehawk material (according to Jason and Daniel of AVS) is no longer available. Stewart will only sell full screens. I'm just not ready to plunk down 2/3 the price of my projector on a screen.