AVS Forum banner

1 - 20 of 231 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,204 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
If there is a gun pointed at my head and asked to choose which one is Blu-ray or HD DVD, there is a 50% chance that I will survive



Its that close in terms of PQ and AQ. But using screenshots we will be able to see the difference. Including cropping and resizing at 200%. I won't be including the DVD version this time.


What you get here is less artifacts (visible only and discernable by looking at the screenshots) on Blu-ray but more pronounced EE
. EE is visible on both formats. Blu-ray has a new encode with higher bitrate 23.30 mbps compared to HD DVD at 17.00 mbps. DNR is added and more pronounced in some scenes.


No major difference in PQ.


For the first time I made some serious attempt at comparing sound quality and it convinces me that I would rather leave that to people with audiophile ears with equipment to match it. I only have a Paradigm monitor 7 with CC-390 center speaker and pair of ADP-390 for rear and side speaker surrounds. Even with that speaker setup I can't really distinguish which one is better. Although the DTS-MA track from Blu-ray is tad bit louder (?) Is that better? Bear in mind my opinion on the AQ only applies to this title.


If we are going to see any worthwhile improvements it wil be a remastering. There is still dust and specks here and there. And the complete removal of EE.


In the end the higher bitrate and lossless sound will give the Blu-ray version the edge. Regardless if its discernible or not. If both versions were released at the same time, I will choose Blu-ray.

HD DVD File size: 20 GB


Bitrate: 17.00 mbps



Blu-ray File size: 26.40 GB


Bitrate: 23.30 mbps



Code:
Code:
Total   Video                                             
Title                                                           Codec   Length  Movie Size      Disc Size       Bitrate Bitrate Main Audio Track                          Secondary Audio Track
-----                                                           ------  ------- --------------  --------------  ------- ------- ------------------                        ---------------------
The Mummy                                                       VC-1    2:04:53 31,593,603,072  35,810,635,675  33.73   23.30   DTS-HD Master 5.1 4649Kbps (48kHz/24-bit) DTS-HD Hi-Res 2.0 192Kbps

PLAYLIST REPORT:

Name:           00007.mpls
Size:           31,593,603,072 bytes
Length:         2:04:53 (h:m:s)
Total Bitrate:  33.73 Mbps
Description:    

FILES:

Name            Size            Length          Time In         Time Out        
----            ----            ------          -------         --------        
00000.M2TS      31,593,603,072  2:04:53.235     0:00:00.000     2:04:53.235     

VIDEO:

Codec               Bitrate         Description     
-----               -------         -----------     
VC-1 Video          23301 kbps      1080p / 23.976fps
VC-1 Video          1421 kbps       480p / 23.976fps

AUDIO:

Codec                           Language        Bitrate         Description     
-----                           --------        -------         -----------     
DTS-HD Master Audio             English         4649 kbps       5.1 / 48kHz / 24-bit / 4649kbps (DTS Core: 5.1 / 48kHz / 24-bit / 1536kbps)
DTS Audio                       French          768 kbps        5.1 / 48kHz / 24-bit / 768kbps
DTS Audio                       Spanish         768 kbps        5.1 / 48kHz / 24-bit / 768kbps
Dolby Digital Audio             English         192 kbps        2.0 / 48kHz / 192kbps
Dolby Digital Audio             English         192 kbps        2.0 / 48kHz / 192kbps
Dolby Digital Audio             English         192 kbps        2.0 / 48kHz / 192kbps
DTS-HD Audio                    English         192 kbps        2.0 / 48kHz / 192kbps

SUBTITLES:

Codec                           Language        Bitrate         Description     
-----                           --------        -------         -----------     
Presentation Graphics           English         27 kbps                         
Presentation Graphics           French          20 kbps                         
Presentation Graphics           French          1 kbps                          
Presentation Graphics           Spanish         19 kbps                         
Presentation Graphics           Spanish         1 kbps                          

CHAPTERS:

Number          Time            Name                            
------          ----            ----                            
1               0:00:00.000     Chapter 1                       
2               0:07:10.596     Chapter 2                       
3               0:12:19.196     Chapter 3                       
4               0:23:19.689     Chapter 4                       
5               0:29:03.283     Chapter 5                       
6               0:36:46.204     Chapter 6                       
7               0:43:38.866     Chapter 7                       
8               0:49:06.568     Chapter 8                       
9               0:53:34.127     Chapter 9                       
10              0:57:29.612     Chapter 10                      
11              1:11:13.310     Chapter 11                      
12              1:18:48.265     Chapter 12                      
13              1:27:29.577     Chapter 13                      
14              1:30:03.940     Chapter 14                      
15              1:36:32.828     Chapter 15                      
16              1:43:58.899     Chapter 16                      
17              1:49:44.828     Chapter 17                      
18              1:56:52.088     Chapter 18                      
19              2:04:52.985     Chapter 19                      

STREAM DIAGNOSTICS:

File            PID             Type            Seconds         Bytes           Packets         Bitrate         
----            ---             ----            -------         -----           -------         -------         
00000.M2TS      4113 (0x1011)   0xEA            7493.24         21,824,944,735  118,722,507     23300.96        
00000.M2TS      4352 (0x1100)   0x86            7493.24         4,354,896,096   24,835,802      4649.42         
00000.M2TS      4353 (0x1101)   0x82            7493.24         719,350,784     4,214,946       768.00          
00000.M2TS      4354 (0x1102)   0x82            7493.24         719,350,784     4,214,946       768.00          
00000.M2TS      4355 (0x1103)   0x81            7493.24         179,837,952     1,170,820       192.00          
00000.M2TS      4356 (0x1104)   0x81            7493.24         179,837,952     1,170,820       192.00          
00000.M2TS      4608 (0x1200)   0x90            7493.24         25,390,479      146,689         27.11           
00000.M2TS      4609 (0x1201)   0x90            7493.24         17,358,355      100,600         18.53           
00000.M2TS      4610 (0x1202)   0x90            7493.24         18,923,234      109,459         20.20           
00000.M2TS      4611 (0x1203)   0x90            7493.24         472,150         2,769           0.50            
00000.M2TS      4612 (0x1204)   0x90            7493.24         569,007         3,354           0.61            
00000.M2TS      4357 (0x1105)   0x81            7493.24         179,837,952     1,170,820       192.00          
00000.M2TS      6912 (0x1B00)   0xEA            7493.24         1,330,565,316   7,381,705       1420.55         
00000.M2TS      6656 (0x1A00)   0xA2            7493.24         179,836,928     1,053,732       192.00
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,204 Posts
Discussion Starter #7
That is it for now. Close ups and "money shots" later
And I know what screenshot you guys want to see
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,947 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kram Sacul /forum/post/14316607


I bet it's going to have the same EE, occasional DNR, and white specks, but better compression. Blu-ray FTW.

May be when both encodes are reported to be minted from the same master with a little bit of tweaking.
If the comparison pix shows no major differences I won't be purchasing these movies.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
10,821 Posts
just as I imagined, the BD has a slightly finer grain structure, which is splendid, same master obviously



you can see VC1's slight motion blur in effect on the last zoom in shot with the guy falling from the camel, as well as the slight grain reduction I already mentioned


thanks dude


-Gary
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,947 Posts
Thanks Xylon for saving my $$$. Will stay away from both movies. Also let's keep in mind that both Mummy titles are ranked too low even in the HD DVD PQ thread.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,171 Posts
If the DTS HD-MA track is a noticable improvement, I'll replace the HD-DVD when there's a really good sale for Universal titles.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,935 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Murrell /forum/post/14316761


just as I imagined, the BD has a slightly finer grain structure, which is splendid, same master obviously



you can see VC1's slight motion blur in effect on the last zoom in shot with the guy falling from the camel, as well as the slight grain reduction I already mentioned


thanks dude


-Gary

Also blocking on the white horse on the foreground:

 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,546 Posts
Thanks Xylon.


So far I'm on "keep hd dvd" mode. The blu-ray appears ever-so-slightly better, but I doubt I could tell without mouseovers and careful examination.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,233 Posts
"Transparent to the master"


The differences are interesting. VC-1's softening plays with the contrast so the AVC encode has more "pop" in certain areas. I'd post a waggle mouseover link but the frames aren't lined up exact. The BRD is a few pixels lower.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,074 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kram Sacul /forum/post/14317056

"Transparent to the master"


The differences are interesting. VC-1's softening plays with the contrast so the AVC encode has more "pop" in certain areas. I'd post a waggle mouseover link but the frames aren't lined up exact. The BRD is a few pixels lower.

I thought that both were VC-1....?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
784 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by stumlad /forum/post/14317008


So far I'm on "keep HD DVD" mode. The Blu-ray appears ever-so-slightly better, but I doubt I could tell without mouse-overs and careful examination.

I'm with you. Also, the HD DVD cost me about $5.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,809 Posts
I can't believe that Universal would put out these titles on Blu that were on HD DVD and not get rid of that damn EE. I will definately keep my HD DVD copies. I think any chance of The 40 Year Old Virgin being EE free or close to it are slim and none.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,948 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Monahan /forum/post/14317396


I can't believe that Universal would put out these titles on Blu that were on HD DVD and not get rid of that damn EE. I will definately keep my HD DVD copies. I think any chance of The 40 Year Old Virgin being EE free or close to it are slim and none.

Remasters cost money, the reason why they release this, is because it helps promote Mummy 3. Not that they will make large $ on the BD.


Sure EE free transfer is always nice, but the market isnt there yet.
 
1 - 20 of 231 Posts
Top