AVS Forum banner
  • Get an exclusive sneak peek into our new project. >>> Click Here
  • Our native mobile app has a new name: Fora Communities. Learn more.

THX certification and subwoofer manufacturers

2455 Views 12 Replies 7 Participants Last post by  Cam Man
First off, I understand that the THX logo doesn’t make a sub more powerful, sound better or really make it a better choice for a HT or music application. It’s just a logo and can’t change the way a sub sounds.


With that out of the way, the THX logo seems like a pretty powerful marketing tool and I am questioning why more subwoofer manufacturers do not submit their products for certification. This line of thinking left me with two possibilities.


1. Some subwoofer manufacturers know their products can not pass and therefore don’t submit them for testing.

2. The testing process and logo use is prohibitively expensive.


Why for instance would SVS not have a single THX subwoofer? Before anyone gets on me about dogging SVS, that’s not the case, I own one and am very happy with it. What about HSU?


When looking at the list of subwoofers that are listed by THX the list is rather small. Why?


-Nathan
Status
Not open for further replies.
1 - 13 of 13 Posts
simple,


They have to pay for the right to place that logo on their sub and a lot of companies will not do that for anything other than their receivers.
In the case of an SVS, or HSU their primary business is subwoofers, so either their designs can't cut it or the THX logo is really quite expensive. It has to be the latter because I would expect the top of the line from either company to pass the test.


Does anyone have any idea what THX charges for the testing procedure?


-Nathan
There was a major thread about this a couple months ago. Do a search.
Quote:
Originally posted by DMF
There was a major thread about this a couple months ago. Do a search.
I get 25 results from searching this forum for THX. Of those 25 there is only one big thread referenced. It's called "is my svs broken" and the only mention of THX is about speaker size settings.


You wouldn't happen to have a link about this would you?


I did read the 200+ post thread called "svs and high end..." or something like that and I recall that people were mentioning that SVS wasn't THX certified, but beyond that I’ve not seen this discussed much here.


-Nathan
See less See more
There are more reasons why they wouldn't pay or bother with THX certification:


#3: Their demand outstrips their supply.


#4: The THX logo may not have a desired effect on demand.


If they're already putting out subs at capacity, then a THX selling point wouldn't sell more subs, as the limiting factor is their order-supply-manufacture-deliver chain. Rather, improving those items would sell more subs.


The THX logo may not help much. They are catering to a certain market segment, which differs from Velodyne or Revel or Klipsch. A reputation for high value is their selling point.


Here's why it could hurt sales. Marketing is about maximizing certain appearances to appeal to your desired market segment. That does not necessarily mean, "appeal more upscale, capable, and trendy."

Thus, a Honda brochure will look different from a Jaguar's. And even though Wal-Mart can afford whatever glitzy in-store displays it might want, rather they have a more "discount store" look, as opposed to Target. The latter's prices are similar, and many of the products are the same. Yet their target markets differ, and so does their marketing.


The THX logo might cost $50 more per item on average. That would force prices to rise or sales to increase enough to make up for the tighter margins (if that's even possible). Also, the expense of the actual certification process in terms of internal manhours could take a toll and be disruptive. In the end, the subs would improve in quality, as the features, enclosures, and amps would be changed. Yet, they would ask, "Did we need to improve those areas? We are already improving, on our own, in ways that are already selling more subs."
See less See more
 This one.


Some excellent input from industry insiders.
so far the facts indicate the real cost and risk is the redesign of a existing sub that fails.....not licensing, testing or fees.
Quote:
Originally posted by cajunlab
so far the facts indicate the real cost and risk is the redesign of a existing sub that fails.....not licensing, testing or fees.
canjunlab makes a good point here. Also, if their target customer base doesn't seem to care about THX certification, then they aren't going to waste their time on it.
Quote:
Originally posted by DMF
This one.


Some excellent input from industry insiders.
Thank you.


-Nathan
One point I thought was very interesting: If people pay attention to THX Cert, then they tend to lump all subs with cert together, as if they were equivalent. And marketing guys will do anything to differentiate theirs from everyone else's.
Quote:
Originally posted by DMF
One point I thought was very interesting: If people pay attention to THX Cert, then they tend to lump all subs with cert together, as if they were equivalent. And marketing guys will do anything to differentiate theirs from everyone else's.



I had not considered it from that point of view. As a consumer, who is about to spend another 1400 on a new subwoofer, I would feel better knowing that an outside body has measured the performance of the subwoofer and found it to be acceptable.


I don't have the listening experience to be able to tell you how an SVS PB12-plus/2 will compare to a DD-12 from Velodyne. I also don't have the cash available to order several subs for an in-home demo, so there is little chance that I’ll be able to "trust my ears" on this purchase.


I've listened to several subwoofers at in-store demos and been impressed with some and disappointed in others. It is very hard to get a proper demo away from home and I have a hard time comparing subwoofers that I’ve heard under wildly varying conditions.


What I have learned from my purchase of a PB10isd is that I require a bit more subwoofer then I first expected. The PB10 is a huge improvement over my old sub and sounds great, but I have decided I want more. My first inclination is to purchase a PB12-plus/2 since I am so happy with the sound and build quality of the PB10 and only want something to pressurize my room a bit better. The extra $1000 that I would spend on the PB12-plus/2 requires me to look at other options to ensure that I will not have buyer’s remorse. While I was looking at other options I started thinking about the THX logo and thus this post was made.


I feel like I am playing around in a no-mans-land in my home audio price point. I can not justify spending mega bucks on a system that would impress many of the posters on this board and I can’t properly audition all of the available subwoofers in my determined price range. For someone like me, the THX logo is comforting. The comments in the linked thread about the manufacturer getting a 300 page document back from THX on a subwoofer that failed certification lets me know there is a whole lot that goes into this process.


I will likely be ordering the PB12-plus/2 in the next day or so simply because it appears that there is very little in this price range that can compete with what SVS has put together. On the other hand, SVS’ website is full of comments about their lower priced subwoofers blowing the high priced “audiophile†subwoofers to the weeds. With comments like;


“ If you have a large room, or simply an insatiable appetite for powerful, deep and subtle bass for music and home theater… but prefer not to spend the $4K normally required to ante up to this world-class audiophile table … SVS has something new --- the PB12-Plus/2.â€


And


“Feel free to compare this SVS to $5,000 subwoofers you have lusted over for years. Then rest easy knowing the new PB12-Ultra/2 will blow them all into the weeds (in a subtle, deeply accurate and "musical" sort of way naturally)â€


I would feel better to see SVS listed right alongside the more expensive subwoofers on the THX page.


If this is a matter of something as simple as magnetic shielding then it’s a non-issue for me, but the THX logo can give a little extra peace of mind for someone who is in my situation.


-Nathan
See less See more
Another consideration is the difference between the older THX Ultra requirements and the new Ultra2. I hear that the Ultra2 spec is brutally difficult for sub manufacturers to meet. Not sure what the deal is, but it gives manufacturers fits.


I've owned both Ultra and now Ultra2: JBL THX Ultra subs, and now the Klipsch Ultra2. Our room is quite large, and although I thought the JBLs were great, the Klipsches trounce them mightily on the most demanding passages/effects with ease. Is it due to the new specs? Don't know, don't care.
1 - 13 of 13 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top